Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Petraeus: "I Don't Know" If Iraq Policy Makes America Safer

Posted by Steve Benen at 6:43 AM on September 12, 2007.


Steve Benen: If we're fighting a war and hard-to-predict success won't improve our national security, then we should get the hell out of there.
Petraeus:

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

Today's Senate hearings with Gen. David Petraeus and Amb. Ryan Crocker have been surprisingly informative, but I have a hunch this may prove to be the one-minute exchange that you'll be hearing the most about.

The clip shows Sen. John Warner (R-Va.) asking Petraeus specifically whether "victory" in Iraq will make the United States safer. Petraeus is surprisingly blunt, "I don't know, actually."

The question was, at first blush, almost a set-up. I can't speak to Warner's motivations, obviously, but it seemed like a softball -- Warner would ask if success would make us safer, Petraeus would say yes, and Warner could move on to exploring how to make the policy produce a "victory."

But Petraeus seemed to miss his cue. As Spencer Ackerman noted, "Bush describes a victory in Iraq as an epochal achievement for America and a potentially decisive blow to terrorism," but asked today whether a victory, no matter how unlikely it appears, would make us safer, the top commander in the theater isn't certain.

Now, to be fair, I don't want to wrench this from context. Petraeus probably didn't intend to make such a sweeping concession; he probably meant to argue that he's focused on the mission in front of him. Whether the success of that mission helps improve the security of the United States simply isn't on his radar.

But this wasn't a trick question. If we're fighting a war, conditions are dismal, and hard-to-predict success won't improve our national security, then it reinforces the idea that maybe, just maybe, we should get the hell out of there.

For those who can't see video clips from their work computers, here's a transcript, by way of Ilan Goldenberg:

Senator Warner: Are you able to say at this time if we continue what you have laid before the congress here, this strategy, do you feel that that is making America safer?

General Petraeus: Sir, I believe this is indeed the best course of action to achieve our objectives in Iraq.

Warner: Does that make America safer?

General Petraeus: Sir I don't know actually. I have not sat down and sorted in my own mind what I have focused on and what I have been riveted on is how to accomplish the mission of the multinational force Iraq.

I have a hunch we'll be seeing quite a bit of this one.

Digg!

Tagged as: warner, iraq war, petraeus

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch
They're all inter-related, you know.
Post by General JC Christian. July 9, 2009.
After Casting Sole No Vote on Slavery Memorial, Rep. King Keeps Digging Deeper
This is one contorted excuse.
Post by Steve Benen. July 9, 2009.
Airing of Grievances: Right-Winger Incensed over 'Commie's' Jab at 'Saturday Night Fever'
Oh, and Pinochet was a good guy, damnit!
Post by Roy Edroso. July 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Soft Question?
Posted by: the islander on Sep 12, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it seems to me that the question of whether what we are doing in Iraq is making America safer would throw a philosophical monkey wrench into the general's view of his mission in Iraq. He has never thought about it.
i think I can postulate that brute force is not designed to breed safety.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are we safer?
Posted by: Sandlin on Sep 12, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Patraeus doesn't know if we're safer in America after he's done his spree of killing more Iraqis who had nothing to do with the 9-11 attack. I digress, sorry.
Wouldn't you think that, since making us safer IS his mission, that he'd have some index system to tell if he's being successful? It's his job, isn't it, to "make us safer"?
Someone needs to ask him, as he now stand on American soil, if HE feels safer.
What is it about once competent people, that when they get around the Bush administration, they demonstrate massive disconnection from any sense of reality based thinking?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good job, brownie. or: of course we don't know what the endgame is because there is none
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Sep 12, 2007 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this administration tool knows that this is an occupation and will continue to be. he is there to make it last. there is no intention by the current administration to leave (addition of massive bases in iraq, construction of the largest 'embassy' in the world, war profiteering on an unbelievable scale). spending as much time in the military allows this man to lose perspective, choose perspective and influence the american people. never trust a man who makes his career off the concept of a 'good and just war' to tell you anything true about peace. it isn't in his own interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]