Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Top Cheney Aide: "We're One Bomb Away From Getting Rid" Of FISA Court

Posted by Steve Benen at 2:00 PM on September 4, 2007.


Steve Benen: A new book by former Assistant Attorney General Jack Goldsmith proves that Cheney's alter ego David Addington is a lunatic.
wiretapper
Cheney

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

When it comes to the Bush administration's national security policies, former Assistant Attorney General Jack Goldsmith has always been an important figure, but with the publication of his new book, we're able to get some new insights into what he saw, and what the Bush gang was up to. In this case, that means more alarming revelations about out-of-control officials who treat the rule of law like a punch-line.

Goldsmith is as conservative as they come when it comes to political ideology, but he seems anxious to highlight the extent to which he disapproved of the White House's excessive tactics. Goldsmith also, apparently, considers David Addington, Dick Cheney's legal alter ego, a bit of a lunatic.

[Goldsmith] shared the White House's concern that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act might prevent wiretaps on international calls involving terrorists. But Goldsmith deplored the way the White House tried to fix the problem, which was highly contemptuous of Congress and the courts. "We're one bomb away from getting rid of that obnoxious [FISA] court," Goldsmith recalls Addington telling him in February 2004.

Their debate over the Geneva Conventions was even more striking.

When Goldsmith presented his analysis of the Geneva Conventions at the White House, Addington, according to Goldsmith, became livid. "The president has already decided that terrorists do not receive Geneva Convention protections," Addington replied angrily, according to Goldsmith. "You cannot question his decision." (Addington declined to comment on this and other details concerning him in this article.)

Goldsmith then explained that he agreed with the president's determination that detainees from Al Qaeda and the Taliban weren't protected under the Third Geneva Convention, which concerns the treatment of prisoners of war, but that different protections were at issue with the Fourth Geneva Convention, which concerns civilians. Addington, Goldsmith says, was not persuaded.

Months later, when Goldsmith tried to question another presidential decision, Addington expressed his views even more pointedly. "If you rule that way," Addington exclaimed in disgust, Goldsmith recalls, "the blood of the hundred thousand people who die in the next attack will be on your hands."

Indeed, it appears Goldsmith's book is going to be a wealth of behind-the-scenes information.

Digg!

Tagged as: cheney, terrorism, bush administration, civil liberties, wiretapping, addington

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Prison Officials Have Banned an Inmate From Reading Obama’s Books
Obama wrote that “the dealth penalty does little to deter crime” and said "no innocent person should end up on death row.”
Post by Ian Millhiser. July 10, 2009.
The Evilest of Evil CEOs Swiftboating Health Reform
This guy's a creep with millions to burn.
Post by Digby. July 10, 2009.
More Right-Wing Whining Over Media's Coverage of Sarah Palin
Ho-hum, the poor misunderstood woman.
Post by Eric Boehlert. July 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Great Terror
Posted by: eddie torres on Sep 4, 2007 3:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Goldsmith certainly picked an appropriate book title: "The Terror Presidency".

According to the NYT Magazine piece, Gonzales, Addington, Bill Haynes (Defense Department general counsel), and John Yoo formed some kind of Robespierre-esque Committee of Public Safety. John Yoo wrote the OLC's March 2003 "torture memo" but Goldsmith later withdrew it, with Ashcroft's support, after it was leaked to the press.

Ultimately Addington and the VP prevailed using Goldsmith's successor, Daniel Levin: "Yoo says it is his understanding that no policies or interrogation techniques changed as a result of the withdrawal of the torture memo, noting that all policies that were legal under the withdrawn opinions are also acknowledged as legal under the opinion that eventually replaced the withdrawn ones."

The OLC under Goldsmith was not acting as a "civil libertarian" brake to assaults on the Constitution by the vice president's clan. Goldsmith just wanted to set up a structure whereby executive branch bureaucrats would not be sued or prosecuted for war crimes.

Addington wanted the structure to be a veil of secrecy; Goldsmith wanted it to be Congressionally approved changes to FISA. But the end result is still an erosion of civil liberties.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, Now We Know -
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle on Sep 4, 2007 4:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick Cheney is in fact insane.

Paranoid? Check.
Has an alter-ego which may possibly represent another personality? Check.
Delusional and completely out of touch with reality? Check.
Worsening condition? Check. (There really was a time when he wasn't so bad.)

With as many heart attacks as he's had, it would come as no surprise to me if we learned he's had a few strokes, too. This might be the first time in history when two mentally deficient men have occupied the two highest positions in our government. One, the President, is clearly retarded, while the other, the Vice President, has probably suffered some form of brain damage related to his cardiovascular disease. If they weren't of such poor character and leading our country to ruin as we speak, I'd pity them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, Now We Know - Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: Well, Now We Know - Posted by: katz22br
» RE: Well, Now We Know - Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: Well, Now We Know - Posted by: katz22br
Another Attack
Posted by: Jeanne on Sep 4, 2007 4:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's what this administration wants and needs. It would be an answer to their prayers. And you know, I think they'd be up to helping the Almighty along with that. The American public would react predictably. Instead of saying, "What? You failed to protect us, again??" They'd beg for a police state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And they are...
Posted by: bob t on Sep 4, 2007 8:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...just one bomb away from destroying our democracy. And their ally, bin Laden could not be happier, just as they could not be happier.
They will make it happen. Then America will become just another theo-corporate dictatorship much the same as Saudi Arabia is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Translation
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 5, 2007 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are one bomb away from destroying American democratic government and begining to truly institute a police state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Translation Posted by: lively56
The Bush Administration's hatred for the American people
Posted by: JAVA on Sep 5, 2007 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all that the American people have been through with this administration it seems to me that those on the top hold no love for those on the bottom. The endless request for more soldiers to fill in for the dead ones being sent back home. The constant lying to and stealing from the hard working Americans trying to salvage what is left of the lives they have left in this country. Daring anyone to speak out. The cruel and horrendous treatment of it's citizens through lying to spying. Petting one group against the other until everyone is so confused that nothing ever is done about increasing financial market recession and billions of dollars going to the already super wealthy. Spying on a level that innocent people are being murdered by stalker freaks with the okay to live out their evil fanatic dreams. Sexual deviant activity in the White House among Senators. Government funds used in illegal activities and a judicial system that's so deaf to the cries of the American people that it will gleefully lockup, lie and spy on anyone who says anything about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry if someone else commented on this bit but,
Posted by: silverwizard on Sep 6, 2007 2:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's late/early and I'm getting a bit sleepy so I didn't read all the comments.
Thing is, IF we are fighting a "war" on "terror" (can you get more nebulous than this?), then ANY person defined as a terrorist is AUTOMATICALLY covered by the articles of war...INCLUDING the Geneva Conventions!

That's all folks. No debate possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]