Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Ron Paul Revolution Will Not Be Televised

Posted by Richard Blair at 6:34 AM on September 4, 2007.


Richard Blair: Ron Paul's third place showing in the ultraconservative Texas straw poll gives his grassroots supporters a reason to believe.
ronpaul1
Paul

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Richard Blair, originally appeared on All Spin Zone

This week, cadaverous Fred Thompson (R-Law and Orderâ„¢) is expected to finally pull the trigger and announce his candidacy for the GOP presidential nomination. I'm hopeful that, as he makes it official, other GOP candidates greet his entrance appropriately. Thompson isn't exactly presidential timber, and there are rumors of a lot of skeletons rattling around in his closet that should be falling out into the public view in 3...2...1...

Bottom line - Thompson may be exiting the race a lot faster than he decided to get into it.

Quixotic candidate Ron Paul, on the other hand, continues to gather a bit of momentum and positive press. On Friday, Associated Press published a rather fluffy piece on Mr. Paul and his growing legion of libertarian GOP supporters:

Passengers on a plane leaving New York could see three words in 4-foot block letters painted on an East Village rooftop terrace as they ascended: GOOGLE RON PAUL. The entreaty to search the Internet for news of the Republican congressman from rural Texas is one of the more visible signs of enthusiasm from a do-it-yourself base of Web fans. Their support doesn't show up in public opinion polls, but it's unmatched among presidential candidates in its passion...

The supporters have an entrepreneurial drive and get their political news from Internet sources outside the mainstream media, especially blogs and news aggregators that rely on popular vote to determine news value.

That same spirit inspires them to canvass parade routes in 100-degree heat, argue campaign strategy in two-hour meetings or paint the roof of a Manhattan apartment building.

"To get your arms around everything and understand what is going on is really impossible to do," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said of supporters roaming the Web...

Then, on Saturday - let's not forget it's a holiday weekend here in the states - the Texas GOP held a presidential candidate straw poll. Voting was not open to just anyone who had the price of admission in their pocket (as was the recent straw poll in Iowa). The Texas GOP straw poll was only open to current and former state-level and federal-level GOP convention delegates. In other words, Bush's base. How did Paul finish? Third, behind anti-immigrant jingoist Duncan Hunter and aforementioned Thompson.

On the face of it, a third place finish might not seem like such good news for Mr. Paul's campaign. Digging a little deeper, though, reveals that it's another energizing finish for his supporters. Let's be realistic. Participants in this poll were die hard Republicans, and probably more to the point, die hard TEXAS Republicans. They are anti-immigration in the extreme, ergo one of the reasons that Hunter garnered so many votes:

...Hunter got 534 votes, or 41% of the vote. Former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee, who is expected to announce his candidacy this week but was not at the event, came in second with 266 votes, or nearly 21%. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas came in third with 217 votes, or 17%.

Crowd support seemed split between Hunter and Paul, whose supporters waved signs and chanted his name throughout the day...

So, ok, the Texas GOP straw poll was not an indication of much of anything. While the Iowa straw poll could be honestly billed as a "beauty contest", the Texas poll appears to have been little more than a gathering of anti-immigration GOP activists. Which, on the face of it, makes Paul's showing even more impressive, considering his anti-war stance (Paul is anti-immigration, as well).

Here's a sampling of reaction from his online supporters:

From disinter:

Ron Paul's third place finish was a huge success considering the rules of the poll were designed specifically to prevent him from winning...

Ronpaulmania.com:

If you take into account the delegates who could not vote plus the exit poll results - Ron Paul won the Texas straw poll fair and square. What does that say about the GOP and mainstream media? I'll be clear and blunt - They cannot be trusted at all.

Video from american freedom:

Ron Paul supporters turned away by fellow [Texas] Republicans. Apparently you have to be a neocon to be considered a true member of the Republican Party...

Sue Bob attends the straw poll (with video):

I went to Crawford two years ago to protest Cindy Sheehan. I, too, support Ron Paul and his views on the Iraq War. He believes that an undeclared war is unconstitutional...

I'll continue following Ron Paul's quixotic quest, if for no other reason than I really get into the people-powered dynamic that drives a presidential campaign such as his. Interestingly enough, back in the day I campaigned for both John Anderson and Paul Simon - both underdogs (one R, one D) who ran largely grassroots efforts, pre-world wide web. So, perhaps my personal history is why Mr. Paul's campaign has captured my imagination (if not my vote).

And lastly, if you missed my previous Ron Paul blogging, here's my disclaimer: I am not a Ron Paul supporter. The vast majority of his policies are completely counter to the progressive agenda (his anti-war stance aside). Plus, I simply would not vote for a GOP presidential candidate in 2008 under any circumstances.

Digg!

Tagged as: election08, republican party, hunter, paul, thompson

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


Oh No! The Dictionary Has a Liberal Bias!
Is nothing sacred?
Post by Roy Edroso. July 5, 2009.
Amid 2012 Hopefuls' Career Implosions, Future Looks Bleak for GOP
Where are they going from here?
Post by Booman. July 5, 2009.
Yes Men Say No to Jerusalem Film Festival
The famous political pranksters withdraw latest flick in support of divestment movement.
Post by Staff. July 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ron Paul is a wedge candidate
Posted by: sausage on Sep 4, 2007 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm beginning to think that the GOP is deliberately using Congressman Paul as a wedge candidate to siphon votes away from whoever many eventually be the Democratic Party presidential nominee.

Look for Paul to mount a well-funded independent or Libertarian Party candidacy in '08. Remember, Libertarian Party adherents like to claim it is the largest, and therefore most legitimate, political party outside the two majors.

His positions on ending American occupation in Iraq and on civil liberties are attractive to many liberals disaffected with the major party candidates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» re: Posted by: CatDad
GO RON PAUL! GO RON PAUL! GOD BLESS RON PAUL!
Posted by: nmlifestyles on Sep 4, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Best Ron Paul video - (Reply: WRONG!...Best Presidential Candidacy Video EVER!!!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFfdB5OzlyQ

Ron Paul "Dream On" Video!!!!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8

Ron Paul "Don't Tread On Me" Video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=FG_HuFtP8w8

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul actually works for Progressives.
Posted by: dada21 on Sep 4, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a progressive by any means, but many of my friends and work acquaintances are. I produce a few younger bands, and also help with the live venue experience as a side project. Most, if not all, of the younger folk I meet are ultra-progressive, and I've talked to more than few who accept the idea that a Progressive USA is not likely to happen. Both the neo-cons and neo-libs have control of the Federal Government, which means that there is absolutely NO chance for a truly libertarian or truly progressive union of States.

It is candidates LIKE Paul who want to dismantle the Federal Government's provisions that over-ride independent State issues. Under a Paul Presidency, you would see significantly more power sent to the State level, with the Federal government leaving Progressive issues to the States completely.

What would this mean? It would mean that Progressives, or their libertarian detractors, would have the chance to unite under their cause at the State level. We might see California, a huge population that is larger than many entire nations, move towards a Progressive "utopia"; we might just as easily see New Hampshire move to a Libertarian "utopia" also. Progressives in NH can move to CA, and Libertarians in CA can move to NH.

Taking power away from the Federal government and returning it to the States (or the Individuals) is what Progressives SHOULD be voting towards. The best way to change society is to do so locally. We're seeing MANY cities and municipalities move towards a more Progressive government, so why not hit the Federal monster where it hurts, and reduce its size so you can focus YOUR dollars, and YOUR time in your own community and state?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul is an anti-war CONSERVATIVE.
Posted by: Ellie1 on Sep 4, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is against a woman's right to chose, and every one of his stands except for the war are PURE BUSHIT! And we sure don't need another conservative TEXAN in the White House.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Abortion is a real issue? Posted by: Chris S
Ron Paul, a rethug from Texas gets an article, not a word about
Posted by: johngary66 on Sep 4, 2007 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dennis Kucinich or Mike Gravel. Oh that's right, they are progressives! Alternet doesn't write about progressives. I check every evening so don't try to tell me you have had a lot of articles about them. If a poster puts their name in a thread that doesn't count! I don't expect an endorsement, just at least as much ink as you give the top three Dems. Kucinich and Gravel are certainly quotable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul is not anti-immigration
Posted by: RightLeft on Sep 4, 2007 8:53 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Ron Paul is against illegal immigration, he has repeatedly talked about not making illegal immigrants into "scapegoats". The culprit is the managed trade agreements like NAFTA and CAFTA, which demand cheap labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Constitution Worship?
Posted by: peacelf on Sep 5, 2007 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ron Paul LOVES the Constitution, or at least his interpretation of it, which is what makes Paul an enigma in the Republican Party. He doesn't realize that the Constitution was written over 200 years ago, and government then could not anticipate the power of wealth, even though the founding brothers were just as much a part of the white male club as members of the wealthy class are today.

Paul would like to return to the mythological days of free market economics, less Federal government and no social services. Well, the market was not free in the early days of corporations. Indeed, the corporation's power was greatly limited in early U.S. history.

If we could return to corporate charters lasting only 5-10 years, or the days when corporations couldn't own property, and must provide a service or the charter was revoked, then I'd vote for Paul. And, social programs?

Well, if RP can create an economy with 100% employment, health benefits for everyone, mandatory paid vacation time, paid family leave, mandatory retirement at 65, and throw in a 35 hour work week, and I'd vote for him everyday of the week and twice on Sundays (if I lived in Florida).

Oh yeah, I don't think the states rights thing worked too well prior to the civil rights era. A weak federal government invites a new era of Jim Crow, illegal abortion rights, gay bashing, and a host of other maladies that we can't imagine yet.

So, vote Ron Paul if you have an active imagination; or vote Kucinich if you want real change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]