Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sen. Craig Uses "Wide Stance" Excuse for Lewd Conduct in Airport Men's Room

Posted by Pam Spaulding at 5:49 AM on August 28, 2007.


Pam Spaulding: Craig repeatedly leered between the cracks into the stall the officer was in, then entered the adjacent stall to play footsie and gesture under the partition for sex.
311xinlinegallery

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Pam Spaulding, originally appeared on Pam's House Blend

A little recap for schadenfreude lovers. It was a bad time for cruising for homophobic Senator Larry Craig (R-ID), who pleaded guilty on August 8 to a disorderly conduct charge after his arrest in the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in June.

An undercover officer just happened to be investigating complaints of lewd behavior and cruising in the men's restroom there when Craig decided to repeatedly leer between the cracks into the stall the officer was in, then proceeded to enter the adjacent stall and play footsie and gesture under the partition for sex. Larry, btw, learn to flush.

Karsnia showed his police identification under the stall. "With my left hand near the floor, I pointed towards the exit," the report said. "Craig responded, 'No!' I again pointed towards the exit. Craig exited the stall with his roller bags without flushing the toilet. ... Craig said he would not go. I told Craig that he was under arrest, he had to go, and that I didn't want to make a scene. Craig then left the restroom."

The senator, once detained at the Airport Police Operations Center tried the old "do you know who I am?" maneuver, showing the arresting officer his business card indicating he was a Powerful Man of InfluenceTM, saying "What do you think about that?" but alas, that didn't fly. Here's the guilty plea court document.

In the annals of GOP sexual hypocrisy excuses, we have this new one to add to the database -- the Wide Stance DefenseTM.

Craig denied any lewd intentions and told police he has a "wide stance" in the bathroom and reached down to pick up a piece of paper from the floor.

"It should be noted that there was not a piece of paper on the bathroom floor, nor did Craig pick up a piece of paper," Karsnia wrote in the police report.

He pled guilty, but now he says it was all a big misunderstanding (sound familiar?).

"At the time of this incident, I complained to the police that they were misconstruing my actions," he said. "I should have had the advice of counsel in resolving this matter. In hindsight, I should not have pled guilty. I was trying to handle this matter myself quickly and expeditiously."

What -- the pickup, the power play at the police station, or trying to make it all go away?

Craig, by the way, avoided 10 days in the Hennepin County, Minnesota pokey/workhouse for his bathroom. He's on probation for a year and paid $575 in fines and fees.The Idaho Statesman's Dan Popkey has a piece on its investigation of Craig's rumored closeted sexual netherworld following Mike Rogers' outing of the Senator in 2006 (more at BlogActive), which included scuttlebutt going back to his college days, and the infamous 1982 pre-emptive denial regarding allegations of sex with underaged congressional pages going on up on the Hill.

The most serious finding by the Statesman was the report by a professional man with close ties to Republican officials. The 40-year-old man reported having oral sex with Craig at Washington's Union Station, probably in 2004. The Statesman also spoke with a man who said Craig made a sexual advance toward him at the University of Idaho in 1967 and a man who said Craig "cruised" him for sex in 1994 at the REI store in Boise.

The Statesman interviewed the Union Station cruise, who said that the men had sex in two restrooms with the encounter lasting "three or four minutes."

***

Yesterday Larry Craig decided to step down as co-senate liaison for Mitt. The Romney's campaign, which proudly hosted a video of Craig supporting the presidential candidate, quickly yanked it from its site (screenshot here), with Mitt's mouthpiece, Matt Rhoades announcing "Senator Craig has stepped down from his role with the campaign. He did not want to be a distraction and we accept his decision."

As we reported yesterday (and how it always is for these guys) Larry Craig's public record as a social conservative is solid. He:

* Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)

* Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)

* Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)

* Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996)

* Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)

Craig also has a 0% rating in HRC's 2006 Congressional Scorecard.

The senator from Idaho, along with John Ashcroft and Trent Lott, formed The Singing Senators. He should think about hooking up with some of these guys to form a new group: Bob Allen, David Vitter, Mark Foley, Glenn Murphy, Jr., Tommy Tester, Ted Haggard...the list goes on and on.

Any suggestions for a name for the group and additional members?


Sarah Palin May Be a Pit Bull in Lipstick, but She's No Populist
Mary Ellen Lease would be ashamed.
Post by Jim Hightower. September 4, 2008.
Republican National Convention: Whitest in Forty Years
As America diversifies, the GOP goes against the grain.
Post by Blue Texan. September 4, 2008.
Jack Abramoff is Going to Jail
Abramoff will see prison time.
Post by Amanda. September 4, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
hey
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 28, 2007 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe he was just intimidated by a black man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They lie until the end.
Posted by: francomef on Aug 28, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who does America hate more Vick or Craig? Once again if Craig would just admit his homosexuality and then get rehabilitated by the fundamentalist Christian all would be forgiven. Then he would be heterosexual once again and he could run for re-election. Idahodians will believe it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Solution
Posted by: realist on Aug 28, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In hindsight, I should not have pled guilty."

No problem, Senator. The law allows you to withdraw your plea, stand trial and let a judge/jury rule on the allegations based on the evidence. When can we expect to see you in court?

(Accidental humor alert: in such situations, the word "hindsight" is probably ill-advised, spin-wise.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Solution Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: A Solution Posted by: realist
A Name for the Band--My Suggestion
Posted by: AlohaTerry on Aug 28, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" G.O.P."---Gay Old Perverts.... It's obvious!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Play Footsie" a 2Truthy Exclusive
Posted by: 2Truthy on Aug 28, 2007 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. Have you detected a pattern here with Republican officials and hypocrisy?

I say, those in glass stalls shouldn't throw stones!

Certainly, no one can accuse elected Republican officials of not having their shit together when it comes to amassing a voting bloc of hypocrites—especially the repressed ones.


As I commented on C&L yesterday, Larry Craig's "play footsie" bathroom stall affair exposes the blatant HYPOCRISY that elected Republicans practice while they publicly support anti-gay legislation. We need laws in place that require ALL REPUBLICAN candidates to go into sex rehab before they can
hold office.

Read more at my site.

-2Truthy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Give me a break!
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 28, 2007 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's bad enough when you have g@y Catholic priest hiding behind their clerical collars and molesting little boys (or, for that manner, hetero pedophile priests messing with little girls)...but these so-called Christian anti-gay Repug lawmakers take the WHOLE CAKE as far as HYPOCRISY is concerned.

THROW THE SOB'S OUT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go ahead, feel superior, judge all you want, but then to find the cause....
Posted by: johngary66 on Aug 28, 2007 3:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
look in the mirror! My heart goes out to this tortured soul. Taught from childhood to hate himself probably by his parents, his church and his fellow man. I would be surprised if he wasn't repressed and self loathing. A special nice job Brownie, to all you bible thumpers out there. You people are so Christ like and loving. So tolerant and forgiving. Look in the mirror people, I haven't seen one tolerant remark in this so called progressive blog. What a shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How do you take a wide stance when your pants are down?
Posted by: sliver on Aug 29, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He must have some really stretchy pants. Or he didn't have his pants down yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why All The Undercover Cops?
Posted by: cellorelio on Aug 29, 2007 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As much as I enjoy seeing the seemingly endless parade of right-wing hypocrisy being exposed, I'm even more concerned that we've entered into a new era where public resources are being used to root out this "scourge" of consensual public sex.

With rapists and murderers (and Constitution defilers) actually victimizing people, why all the concern over victimless crimes like cruising and public sex?

Not that I'm going to defend BJ Allen, but what he did--hang out at a public park restroom and ask an undercover cop if he would like $20 and a blowjob--seems barely criminal. I mean, I expect at least a $20 dinner before I put out.

It doesn't appear the Larry Craig even went that far. Do any of us believe that the undercover cops involved in both incidents didn't put out any signals of their own? I'm sensing entrapment here.

Even if not, you might think that Allen's and Craig's actions were aggressive. Well, let's start to prosecute the construction workers and other men who taunt women as they pass by every single day--then maybe I'll agree that what Allen and Craig did was offensive enough to be arrested.

I fear that 1950s-esque morality has returned. How much longer before raids on social establishments frequented by queer folk?

If you haven't read Cabaret (don't see the Liza Minnelli movie--it was radically changed and its socio-political subtext was neutered), I suggest you do. Another example of how the current US parallels 1930s Germany, before the Nazis came to power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]