Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Mark Foley Refuses To Turn Computers Over To Investigators

Posted by Heather Wood at 5:41 AM on August 24, 2007.


Heather Wood: When it comes to protecting perverts, Congress is more powerful than God.
20060930foleyarrested
Foley

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Heather Wood, originally appeared on The Huffington Post

It must really be nice to live under such a thick veil of protection and secrecy that you can conduct yourself like a complete sleaze bag without repercussions.

The veil of which I speak is, of course, our government. This week as Florida police officers tried to look for, you know, evidence, in their investigation of former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley - who in Sept. 2006 resigned from Congress after being accused of soliciting and sending sexually explicit emails and instant messages to teenage boys - they were stopped cold by Congress. Sorry, said Uncle Sam, but you can't snoop around these parts, criminal investigation or no. Something about "case laws," which is just legal jargon for: Ha ha, there's a precedent-setting case that's stopping you, so there!

Apparently, no matter what one of our elected public officials is doing on their state-issued computers, it's off limits to the public, and certainly the police. Considering Foley spent most of his time at the office, and was allegedly in contact with former Congressional pages (who, if by the time they became "former" were still teens, then Capitol Hill needs to seriously rethink its internship policies) chances are the burden of proof lies in that very computer. Geez, talk about blanket protection. When Catholic priests were being accused of all those horrible, illegal, immoral acts, the law of the Lord protected them for awhile, but eventually the truth - and consequences - came out.

Why does Foley get to jump through loopholes that allow him to escape federal pornography laws - and who knows what else. Now, I'm not accusing the man of the worst things the priests were guilty of, but the last time I checked, partaking in salacious conversations with minors got you arrested, or at least outed and humiliated on the evening news.

And if these ridiculous, elitist protections weren't bad enough, old Foley is resorting to the go-to damage control of public people: He checked himself in to rehab for "alcoholism and other behavioral problems," admitted he was gay and confessed to being molested by a priest as a teenage altar boy in Florida. Damn, another low-blow to the Big Guy.

Digg!

Tagged as: foley page scandal, pornography, foley, republican hypocrisy

Heather Wood is the co-founder/editorial director of the online alternative women's magazine, SirensMag.com and an online editor for Movies.com.


Race-Baiting Former Senator Jesse Helms Has Died
Conservative Republican railed against "Negro hoodlums", opposed the Voting Rights Act, backed terrorists, and died an unrepentant segregationist.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 4, 2008.
NYC Cops Harass Club Owner Whose CCTV Footage Overturned Drug Conviction
Talk about shooting the messenger.
Post by . July 4, 2008.
Watermelon is the New Viagra
USDA-funded research helps Americans put some pizazz in their picnic baskets this fourth of July.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 3, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Misleading Photograph is Cheap Journalism
Posted by: Bill Webb on Aug 24, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was going to link to this blog, because I think it is well-written and substantive. However, I cannot do so because of the image of Mr. Foley. It is obviously altered, he has not been arrested nor charged with a crime, and to post that picture with no explanation is cheap, tawdry journalism.

Sorry, but there it is.

I'm a rabid Progressive, but I've known Mark Foley for 35 years, and fair is fair.

Regards,

Bill Webb

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Charges trumped up Posted by: YogiBear
MARK FOLEY AND HIS COMPUTER SHOULD JUST ROT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 24, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of this is important to the running of this country. We don't need anymore distractons from what we should be doing. There's plenty of porn and wierdness out there for all to enjoy. No one wants to "prosecute" Mark Foley. They want to be entertained. We do that at a high price. Send the guy off into the sunset and let's get on with the business of, let's say Gonzales and Cheney. Not as much fun but much more important. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a lame priority... Posted by: YogiBear
Mark who?
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Aug 24, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could care less about Mark Foley, he belongs on Jerry Springer's show, with all the other deviants and their white trash talking and acting behavior. Or perhaps the real test would be for Fema to give him a trailer from New Orleans and congress to force him to live in it. Now that would be excellent use of those foul smelling tin boxes, just a larger outhouse is what he deserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mark who? Posted by: YogiBear
Holey Schmoley. I agree.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Aug 24, 2007 9:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FBI should indeed be able to pursue Congresscritter Criminals, even if they are hiding behind their public office. I felt that way in the William "Dollar Bill" Jeferson cold-loot case, and I feel that way about Foley's deviant behavior.

Well, at least Foley is gone from Congress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Holey Schmoley. I agree. Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Holey Schmoley. I agree. Posted by: peacefullaim
GUESS WHO'S JEALOUS OF THIS COVER UP
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Aug 25, 2007 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Pervs of the catholick church of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]