Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fox News Producer Calls Elizabeth Edwards' Cancer a "Fundraising Gimmick"

Posted by Pam Spaulding at 2:00 PM on August 7, 2007.


Pam Spaulding: This is bottom-feeder disgusting stuff.
1421350gibsonjohn
John Gibson, who apparently thinks trivializing Elizabeth Edwards' cancer is perfectly reasonable.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Pam Spaulding, originally appeared on Pandagon

This is bottom-feeder disgusting stuff. Look at this exchange between Fox News shill John Gibson and his exec producer "Angry Rich". What class. (Media Matters):

GIBSON: Our John Gibson program fraud alert today focuses on the biggest fraud running for president, and that takes some doing. We're talking about the Breck Girl, Silky, the former senator from North Carolina, the baron of a 28,000-square-foot manse, the protector of the poor while ensconced on a pillow of 100 million dollars.

ANGRY RICH: A man who whored his wife's cancer as a fundraising gimmick.

This is how they appeal to the Base. The right wing cannot sell its ideas (and certainly not its values, given the endless string of sexual hypocrites), so they just get in the gutter and fling excrement like this on the air.

The larger issue here is the misogyny of the Right -- the continual attacks on John Edwards, the whole feminizing-as-an-insult routine says a lot about their utter contempt toward women. They want to control their wombs, their sexuality, and their independence. In their book the best way to demean a political opponent is to feminize male candidates or gay-bait them (as they do with Hillary Clinton, since clearly the right is fixated on lesbian-baiting her).

John Gibson needs to be on a couch.


Latino Migrant Beaten to Death in Penn
A predictable outcome of the overheated immigration debate in this country.
Post by yave begnet. July 24, 2008.
House Hearing on 2004's Lessons Sheds No New Light on Flawed Election
Old arguments and explanations abound about the last presidential election.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 24, 2008.
McCain: Time to Start Rationing Veterans' Healthcare
'McCain received a grade of D from the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and a 20 percent vote rating from the Disabled Veterans of America.'
Post by Steve Benen. July 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
MORE FREE SPEECH ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 7, 2007 3:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People have gotten fired for much less. What gives here? ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MORE FREE SPEECH ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 7, 2007 3:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People have gotten fired for much less. What gives here? ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well...
Posted by: kryptx on Aug 7, 2007 3:31 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clearly the notion that John Edwards might use his wife's cancer to his own political benefit is disgusting. That's why it was said in the first place -- he is as disgusted as you are by the idea. If he wasn't, then he would not have bothered to point it out.

So, what we should be asking is, what was "Angry Rich"'s basis for that statement? If it's true, then our disgust should be focused at Mr. Edwards, right? So, is it true?

Or is that not a question you care about?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well... Posted by: badkitty
» RE: Well... Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: Well... Posted by: trekbike
hey, Mr. Gibson
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Aug 7, 2007 11:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ed Begley Jr. called - he wants his look back.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Doesn't ...
Posted by: kelt65 on Aug 8, 2007 2:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gibson look like one of the creepy men who gives candy bars to little boys in schoolyards? The smile makes me queasy ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JOHN EDWARDS PREDICTED THERE WOULD BE MANY UGLY ATTACKS
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Aug 8, 2007 2:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHEN JOHN EDWARDS REFUSED TO ANY DEMOCRATIC DEBATE ON FOX NEWS, HE WAS WELL AHEAD OF THEM. FOX NEWS IS THE TRASH CHANNEL.. REMEMBER, THIS IS THE TOP BUSH CHANNEL FILLED WITH PERPETUAL AND UNBELIEVABLE LIES. THERE MUST BE A PLACE RESERVED IN HELL FOR JOHN GIBSON. I PRAY TO SEE JOHN AND ELIZABETH AS PRESIDENT AND FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER IT IS FUMIGATED. JOHN AND ELIZABETH EDWARDS ARE THE EPITOME OF THE AMERICAN DREAM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John is Ann Coulter . . .
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Aug 8, 2007 3:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right wing button pusher. In polite society he would be ignored. Much like fox 'news'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'Our John Gibson program fraud alert today...'
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Aug 8, 2007 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cool idea, branding fraud alerts. Wish I'd thought of it.

So, how silent would Edwards have to stay about his wife's cancer not to be accused of exploiting it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» John Edwards Silent? Posted by: Astroboy
Man screw FOX bozo assholes-
Posted by: MobileSucks on Aug 8, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Gibson does not need to be on a couch, he needs to be in a hospital. He needs a severe beating plain and simple. He deserves it. I wish cancer on him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP wins again
Posted by: PJT on Aug 8, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can call them what you like: scum, dregs of the Earth, bottom feeders or whatever. I would like to suggest another name for them: winners. Hate, lies and slander are a proved winning combination, and unless the Dems learn to play the game, they will win again. In case you haven't noticed, regard for common decency went out the window a long time ago. If we keep whining about this instead of going for the throat we will just lose again. We are wasting our breath and our time complaining. If these commentators knew that their lives, their wives lives and their childrens' lives were open season for all forms of gutter attack, whether true or not, then the playing field would be more equal. What does Rush do in his spare time? I'm curious. I want to know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everything you hear on FAUX
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 8, 2007 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has been sanctioned by Karl Rove, who looks like he should be Gibson's brother. They look like a pair of psychotic albinos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gibson the Clueless
Posted by: pocomoco on Aug 8, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few years ago I got in the habit of watching Fox. I liked some of O'Reilly, a little of Hannity and literally nothing of Gibson. He seemed clueless on his program and brain-dead when he filled in for O'Reilly. I eventually dropped Gibson and Hannity completely and only watched the opening five minutes of O'Reilly and his last five minute segment, mostly viewer comments. Then I decided to stop watching Fox altogether.

It seems unreal how such programs can attract permanent viewers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OH PLEASE, THEY'RE JUST WARMING UP!
Posted by: Astroboy on Aug 8, 2007 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of this right-wing hate speech being spewed of late is just the opening act.

The closer we get to Election Day the more vitriolic, hate-filled, angst-ridden and DESPARATE it will be.

THEY ARE SCARED SHITLESS, and it's really beginning to show.

Revel in it! Celebrate it!! Welcome it!!!

Just don't become ONE OF THEM.

The contrasts between THEM and US will be all the greater - as it should be - and the American people will FINALLY SEE THE RIGHT FOR WHAT THEY TRULY ARE.

They're on the ropes - so give them more rope and watch them HANG THEMSELVES!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]