Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Wall Street Journal Gone Wild

Posted by Guest Blogger at 4:49 AM on August 1, 2007.


John Nichols: MoveOn will dispatch newsboys and newsgirls to the streets of New York City to hand out Murdoched versions of The Wall Street Journal in front of the newspaper's headquarters.
299543simpsons300
Murdoch

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by John Nichols, originally appeared on The Nation

There will be plenty of formal responses to the news that The Wall Street Journal will soon join the "stable" of Rupert Murdoch's "media properties.

But few will top that of MoveOn.org Civic Action, the grassroots activism wing of the popular internet forum.

MoveOn will dispatch newsboys and newsgirls to the streets of New York City today to hand out Murdoched versions of The Wall Street Journal in front of the venerable financial newspaper's Manhattan headquarters.

The parody papers will feature actual headlines from Murdoch's Fox News network -- and, with them, the suggestion that the Journal will soon be the latest reflection of Murdoch's one-size-fits-all approach to media.

That approach, it should be noted, is resolutely neo-liberal when it comes to economics -- all for free trade, privatization, deregulation -- and neo-conservative when it comes to superpower politics. It is wholly deferent to the presidents and prime ministers with whom Murdoch willingly and willfully allies himself. And it has a tendency to reduce serious matters to the sort of tabloid takes favored by Murdoch's New York Post newspaper.

Among the actual Fox headlines that will be featured on the Murdoched Journals to be distributed Wednesday:

"All-Out Civil War In Iraq: Could It Be a Good Thing?"

"Is The Liberal Media Helping To Fuel Terror?"

"The #1 President on Mideast Matters: George W. Bush?"

"Study: Some Trees Contribute To Global Warming"

"Have Democrats Forgotten The Lessons of 9/11?"

The headlines are as silly as Fox.

But there point is an important one.

One of America's most respected journalistic voices is in danger of becoming the print version of a certain fairly-imbalanced news network.

"This may be the beginning of the end for the Wall Street Journal," says Adam Green, the civic communications director for MoveOn.org Civic Action. "No sane businessperson or investor will tolerate the type of unreliable, partisan news that Murdoch serves up at Fox and his other media outlets."

Digg!

Tagged as: media, moveon, murdoch, wall street journal, right wing jim cooper

The guest bloggers are a pool of people that blog for AlterNet and share their content. Got a tip? Send it to peek@alternet.org.


Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
l
Posted by: johnp on Aug 1, 2007 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
k

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not the end...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 3, 2007 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....but the end of the beginning...

the Wall Street Journal is done...
who will trust it as a reliable source now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I HAD TO LEARN NOT TO READ THE JOURNAL.
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 9, 2007 5:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who owns it may not be relevant. Who cares what the right wing does? But, THEY MUST BE STOPPED. I'm afraid all sides of our governemnt get bought by campaign financing. There may be no hope for us. They spend vast sums hiring truly clever liars to warp our minds. Some minds seem to be warped permanently.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Damn Murdoch
Posted by: bob t on Aug 25, 2007 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But the Rethugs love him as do the right wing religions, including mine but not me, because they are all thugs and tyrannts just as much as he is.
America and our democratic values and institutions mean NOTHING to any of them just as long as they have dominion and domination over the lives of everyone just so they can maximize their profits and political power.
Damn them all an their agenda of death and slavery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]