Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Is Adam Sandler's New Comedy Homophobic?

Posted by Guest Blogger at 5:38 AM on July 23, 2007.


Bernie Heidkamp: GLAAD has approved "I Pronounce You Chuck and Larry", but does that mean it doesn't portray an anti-gay ideology?
chuckandlarryposter

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Bernie Heidkamp. originally appeared on PopPolitics

As "I Pronounce You Chuck and Larry" premiered this past weekend, critics panned it -- arguing almost universally that it cynically exploited homophobia while superficially emphasizing a message of tolerance. Despite its dream-team pairing of comedic powerhouses Adam Sandler and Kevin James, that mixed message apparently wasn't very funny at all.

So, amidst this critical deluge, who was there to defend the film? Well, gay activists, of course. "Chuck and Larry" received a seal of approval from GLAAD -- the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation -- and it got a positive review for its ideology, if not its comedy, by Alonso Duralde at After Elton.

Huh?

Just call it another strange chapter in Hollywood's hypocritical history of representing gay life.

Stephen Garrett of Time Out Chicago provides a concise synopsis of what bothers most critics -- and admittedly, many other gay activists -- about the film:

An odd mash-up of play-school slurs and enlightened barbs, Chuck and Larry tosses around its gay references with gleeful abandon while keeping its protagonists stridently hetero: Widower James bellyaches about his dead wife and pussyhound Sandler beds a half-dozen lingerie-clad women at a time. The jokes are smart-stupid to the point of hilarity; Sandler fans will not be disappointed. But the whole exercise is schizophrenic, offering stereotypes while chastising prejudice.

Male bonding is the only boy-on-boy action this movie truly celebrates, with a syrupy climax in which the two men wax rhapsodic about their unfettered platonic love. Swishy supporting characters are allowed, but only as punch lines. In a movie where machismo is king, Chuck and Larry didn't even have the balls for one serious homosexual romance. How gay is that?

GLAAD Entertainment Media Director Damon Romine had a different, if somewhat qualified, take:

This is an over-the-top comedy that conveys a strong message of equality. Because it's an exploration of homophobia, some stereotypes and anti-gay slurs are employed. Although we would prefer these types of negative images be erased from media entirely, the overall message of the film is still one which stresses the importance of family and acceptance.

GLAAD has embraced the film because Universal Pictures took the unprecedented step of inviting GLAAD in for an early screening -- asking for its thoughts on the representations in the film. At least some of GLAAD's recommendations were incorporated into the final version of the film, although they admit "problematic content" remains.

What is more fascinating is Alonso Duralde's take on the film for After Elton. His review uses similar language to GLAAD:

Red-staters of every stripe who wouldn't watch a Logo documentary on a BET might very well rush out to see this movie, based on the comic appeal of Sandler and co-star Kevin James alone...If these two guys' guys are able to see gay folks as just folks who deserve the same rights as everyone else, then just maybe the hordes of twenty-something straight boys who flock to Sandler's movies might be able to do the same.

Maybe more significantly, though, in an earlier article Duralde places "Chuck and Larry" on a continuum with such ground-breaking films as "Philadephia" and "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?" as well as other consciousness-raising comedies like "Tootsie," where Dustin Hoffman plays a man impersonating a woman, and "Soul Man," where C. Thomas Howell plays someone white passing for black.

The idea behind those last two films is that having a while male protagonists "makes it easier for viewers who are not gay (or female or black or Jewish) to have a first-hand feeling of what it's like to have that sort of crap flung at you -- particularly if those viewers have ever done the flinging."

Duralde admits this strategy is full of contradictions:

This approach can be tricky, of course - feminists didn't complain about Hoffman playing a woman, but many people were up in arms over the idea of Howell donning "blackface," even if it was with the best of intentions. Gay audiences have been similarly leery of Chuck and Larry for its straight-guys-passing-as-queer plot, to say nothing of the fantasyland scenario in which having a same-sex partner becomes more legally beneficial rather than less.

Well, feminists have complained rather loudly and persuasively about the representations in "Tootsie" -- most famously Elaine Showalter and Andrew Ross.

And like their arguments that saw "Tootsie" as insidiously taking feminism out of women's hands, GLAAD and Duralde need to understand that heterosexual men, however much they "learn" in a film, can't ever carry the burden of representing what it means to be gay.it's not

Digg!

Tagged as: sandler, james, film, homophobia, glaad

Bernie Heidkamp is a Contributing Editor for PopPolitics.


Dems' Godly God-Fest Ends with Prayer by Former Christian Coalition Leader
A leader among the "New Evangelicals."
Post by Joshua Holland. August 29, 2008.
John McCain is Older Than Alaska
23 years older.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. August 29, 2008.
Palin Thinks Hillary is a Whiner
These days Palin is all about praising Hillary's efforts, but she used to sing a different tune.
Post by Melissa McEwan. August 29, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CRUELLA
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 23, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your comment for this movie ended up un the article about Bush and censure. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my question
Posted by: stevepick on Jul 23, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the point of this movie that even though gays are truly the Other, they deserve to be left alone? I guess that's progress, since normally the Other deserves to be punished, but as long as homosexuality is treated as something horrific, it's hard to believe that tolerance will become the norm.

As I understand it, James and Sandler are repulsed at the very prospect of kissing each other, but they preach that it's not fair to denigrate men who do like kissing each other. This could be a necessary step in the evolution of mainstream attitudes, but it's still hard for me to understand that repulsion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heh
Posted by: H_H on Jul 23, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, feminists have complained rather loudly and persuasively about the representations in "Tootsie"

Not to mention complaining loudly (if not persuasively) about everything under the freakin' sun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the point is...?
Posted by: g on Jul 23, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, this is an anti-gay movie because it does not end in a gay romance? Huh? The idea of heterosexual friends necessarily turning into gays makes as much sense as the idea that gays can be "cured," a' la Ted Haggard. I won't see this movie (I hate Adam Sandler), but there is not a single sentence in this article that makes a convincing case that this movie is anti-gay. And just because some feminist criticized Tootsie does not mean that Tootsie is anti-feminist-rather, it means that some feminists should learn to pick their battles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For my money...
Posted by: sausage on Jul 23, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Adam Sandler's as funny as a bucket of warm spit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this really surprising?!
Posted by: Enigma on Jul 23, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GLAAD, the NAACP and ADL have done and perhaps are doing some good things for the people, but if you look at how they function in cases like this one would get the impression that they are shakedown operations. Like a patient hunter they seem to constantly be checking traps for someone who puts their foot in their mouth and offends someone. However, instead of actually fighting to win for the people that they claim to represent all that the person who happens to be caught in the trap has to do is pay up. Cash or token jobs for their cronies. This is the price of having a society that has become so corrupt. Everything, every institution is corrupted to a degree.
By the way, I have heard that years ago when Arnold Swarztenegger was just starting to get famous that he donated $10,000 to the Simon Weisenthal center.... and guess who's stridenly Nazi father is never mentioned?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]