Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Appointed Judge Throws Out Valerie Plame's Civil Suit

Posted by Guest Blogger at 5:20 AM on July 20, 2007.


Steve Benen: Judge Bates' resume includes a stint on Ken Starr's Whitewater team, so we know where he's coming from.
capt.nyet78207191909.cialeakcongressnyet782
Plame

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

This is most disappointing.

A federal judge dismissed former CIA operative Valerie Plame's lawsuit against members of the Bush administration Thursday, eliminating one of the last courtroom remnants of the leak scandal.

Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, had accused Vice President Dick Cheney and others of conspiring to leak her identity in 2003. Plame said that violated her privacy rights and was illegal retribution for her husband's criticism of the administration.

U.S. District Judge John D. Bates dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds and said he would not express an opinion on the constitutional arguments. Bates dismissed the case against all defendants: Cheney, White House political adviser Karl Rove, former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

Plame's attorneys had said the lawsuit would be an uphill battle. Public officials are normally immune from such lawsuits filed in connection with their jobs.

I'm still getting the details -- I have not yet read the dismissal -- but apparently the decision wasn't based on the merits of Plame's claim, but rather procedural issues regarding jurisdiction. (In other words, if you hear/see a conservative say, "Plame's case was thrown out because it was baseless," that's wrong.)

One more thing to keep in mind: Bates was named to the federal bench by -- you guessed it -- George W. Bush. Better yet, Bates was a prosecutor on Ken Starr's Whitewater team, and in 2002, ruled in Dick Cheney's favor in keeping his energy-task force secret.

It's awful to have lost faith in the integrity of parts of the federal judicial system, isn't it?

Digg!

Tagged as: bush administration, plame, wilson, bates, plame leak, whitewater

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Obama Rolls Out Blair, Panetta; Vows 'No Exceptions' to US Values
"We must adhere to our values diligently and with no exceptions." --Barack Obama
Post by Spencer Ackerman. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
wjneill
Posted by: wjneill on Jul 20, 2007 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I can see where the judge issue is gonna go on this one. Bush appointed the judges hearing the Libby and Plame cases. One judge gets overruled and the other judge rules over. In so many words, the Limbaughs of the nation are gonna be chucking harpoons at all of us idealists because we want it one way in one case and another way in another case.

The merits of the Plame case are meritorious and must be pursued. But, I believe the appointments of the judges are gonna be the issues that muddy the waters and the Plame lawsuit is gonna get lost in the muck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, of Course he Did!
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Jul 20, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He wouldn't be a loyal servant of his "Lord High Cockroach" if he didn't.

Its High Time to Clean House!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

plame case
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Jul 20, 2007 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all this means is that judicial oversight is needed in this case, and all of the cases that this judge has ruled on

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah right, when Pigs fly Posted by: ~Fiona~
» RE: Yeah right, when Pigs fly Posted by: VZEQICVA
In other news,
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jul 20, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the sun rises in the east!

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So What?
Posted by: Abushite on Jul 20, 2007 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop Whining - there's worse to come !!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The damage done to our judicial system by the Repugs
Posted by: bettyn on Jul 20, 2007 4:43 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is going to haunt this country for a long, long time. Can we impeach these judges, too? Talk about "legislating from the bench"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]