Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Judge Who Sentenced Libby Slams the Bush Commutation

Posted by Guest Blogger at 11:00 AM on July 13, 2007.


Jane Hamsher: The Bush appointed judge who sentenced Libby to 30 months in jail, weighs in on the absurdity of Bush's interference in the case.
rwalton
walton

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Jane Hamsher, originally appeared on FireDogLake

Judge Walton weighs in (PDF):

In commuting the defendant’s thirty-month term of incarceration, the President stated that the sentence imposed by this Court was “excessive” and that two years of supervised release and a $250,000 alone are a “harsh punishment” for an individual convicted on multiple counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to federal investigators. Although it is certainly the President’s prerogative to justify the exercise of his constitutional commutation power in whatever manner he chooses (or even to decline to provide a reason for his actions altogether), the Court notes that the term of incarceration imposed in this case was determined after a careful consideration of each of the requite statutory factors, and was consistent with the bottom end of the applicable sentencing range as properly calculated under the United Stats Sentencing Guidelines.
Indeed, only recently the President’s Attorney General called for the passage of legislation to “restore the binding nature of the sentencing guidelines so that the bottom of the recommended sentencing range would be a minimum for judges, not merely a suggestion,” a stance that is fully consonant with the policies of this Administration as a whole. In light of these considerations, and given the indisputable importance of “provid[ing] certainty and fairness in sentencing . . . [and] avoid[ing] unwarranted sentencing disparities,” it is fair to say that the Court is somewhat perplexed as to how its sentence could be accurately be characterized as “excessive.” (my emphasis).

When guys like Walton, Fitzgerald and Comey loosen their ties and knock back a couple of beers, you gotta wonder what they are saying privately. I’m gonna guess that “well, the President was well within his rights, let’s all just ‘move on’” is probably not going to be uttered.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, libby, walton

Jane Hamsher is the founder of FireDogLake


Dispatches from the Real Economy: They're Locking Up the Deodorant
You can tell a lot by what gets displayed in a case behind lock and key.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. November 27, 2009.
Where Does Karl Rove Find the Nerve to Criticize Anyone About Deficits?
The chutzpah!
Post by Steve Benen. November 27, 2009.
Why the GOP Will Face an Uphill Battle Making Large Gains in 2010
In addition to the demographics, Bush's legacy, Americans' continued distrust of the party on the issues, etc.
Post by Kos . November 27, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?