Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Iraq Round-Up!

Posted by Joshua Holland at 2:09 PM on July 12, 2007.


The highlights and lowlights of the week that was from the distant reaches of the American Empire.
071007story
071007 story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

If you don't have the time to keep up with all of the day-to-day events in Iraq or follow the ins and outs of the latest policy squabble in DC, AlterNet's new War on Iraq newsletter can keep you up to speed on the most important issue facing the United States today.

Every week, you'll get highlights of AlterNet's Iraq coverage, the best pieces from dozens of other sources around the world and a concise review of the most important stories of the past week delivered right to your inbox. Here's the first round-up. Sign up for this free weekly service here.


In Washington this week, there was much talk of "redeployment" and "redefining" the Iraq "mission," as lawmakers debated the fine print on a whopping $650 billion defense bill for 2008 that will include plenty of money for the occupation to go on. The Congressional Research Service reports that war costs now exceed $12 billion per month, up more than a third from previous estimates.

Intelligence officials testified before Congress this week that the situation had shown "no improvement" and an interim progress report mandated by Congress found that none of the White House's "benchmarks" for progress in matters political, economic, or military have been met. That hasn't stopped the White House from spinning its own report; none of the goals had been met, they acknowledge, but they also touted at least some "progress" in 8 out of 18 issue-areas.

More prominent Republicans began making noises about jumping from the SS Bush as Olympia Snowe (ME) joined Richard Lugar (In), Pete Domenici (NM) and George Voinovich (OH) in calling, at least in theory, for at least a troop "draw-down." It's not much, but it is enough to make the White House jumpy about losing support from within their own party. Senior administration officials, including Condi Rice, reportedly shuttled back and forth to Capitol Hill to shore up support among wavering Republicans.

Consistent with the pattern, it seems to have worked; Lugar, Voinovich and Domenici all supported a filibuster on Tuesday that blocked Virginia Democrat Jim Webb's proposal to guarantee U.S. troops get adequate time at home between deployments.

Meanwhile, it's getting tough to sort out the various proposals for "withdrawal" that the Dems are falling all over themselves trying to get into the spotlight. Spencer Ackerman at TalkingPointsMemo runs down the competing proposals. None of them have enough votes to pass. The argument is that there is political rather than legislative value in bringing the measures before Congress, and that these votes are part of a larger strategy to unify Dems from across the party's ideological spectrum while splitting off Republican legislators and isolating the White House. Color us unconvinced.

Meanwhile, in Iraq, the government of Nouri al-Maliki, widely seen as incompetent and illegitimate, continues to teeter on the brink of collapse. CBS reported this week that the Iraq Project, a bloc of legislators from all of Iraq's major ethno-sectarian groups who have come together to oppose outside interference by the U.S. and Iran, is calling for a no-confidence vote. According to the report, it is likely to fall short of the votes needed to bring down the regime, but our sources aren't so sure. The Iraq Project is the name for the group of nationalists that we wrote about here and here. Although they're fighting for national reconciliation, an end to the sectarian violence, routing out any "foreign fighters" in the country and remaining independent of Tehran, the coalition has opposed them and will no doubt continue to do so.

The security situation continues to deteriorate. The Washington Post reported that 453 unidentified corpses, "some bound, blindfolded, and bearing signs of torture, were found in Baghdad" in June, and noted that the number represented a 41 percent increase from January's total. Missiles and Mortars fell in Baghdad's heavily-armed Green Zone this week, as Turkomen leaders in the town of Armili, north of Baghdad, suggested that their people arm themselves because the government is incapable of providing security.

According to Iraqi officials, Turkey has amassed tens of thousands of troops on Iraq's northern border and has threatened to intervene in the Kurdish Autonomous Region if Kurdish separatist groups continue to launch cross-border raids. The Turkish Government has complained to U.S. officials about American weapons ending up in the hands of Kurdish terror/ resistance groups.

On the media front, don't miss New York Times' Ombudsman Clark Hoyt's excellent take-down of the Times for uncritically repeating the administration's claims that much of the violence in Iraq is caused by al Qaeda.

Lastly, it looks like there are some problems with that huge mega-embassy being built in Baghdad. The Washington Post reported that "diplomats in Iraq, increasingly fearful over their personal safety after recent mortar attacks inside the Green Zone, are pointing to new delays and mistakes in the U.S. Embassy construction project in Baghdad as signs that their vulnerability could grow in the months ahead." The project is marred by the same problems that have plagued much of Iraq's reconstruction. A cable sent by the embassy's staff cited "Poor quality construction …[and] life safety issues" which "left [the embassy] with no recourse but to shut the camp down, in spite of the blistering heat in Baghdad."

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Murdoch and Murdoch Flak Confused About Racism, Truth
What must it be like to do spin for News Corps?
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
On the lighter side...
Posted by: eddie torres on Jul 12, 2007 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IraqSlogger says theives made off with $282 million in cash from a Baghdad bank apparently owned by London's HSBC.

More astounding: it isn't the largest single bank heist in history. Some suspect that the record belongs to the former Hussein regime officials who stole $1 billion from Iraq's central bank in 2003.

The CPA's missing $8.8 billion is not yet considered a bank heist - better get some Guinness officials on the case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about $2.3 Trillion... Posted by: channing
» Speaking of the living dead... Posted by: eddie torres
» Correction: Posted by: eddie torres
Great new word
Posted by: kt1066 on Jul 12, 2007 5:21 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senior administration officials, including Condi Rice, reportedly shittled back and forth to Capitol Hill to shore up support among wavering Republicans.
Great word to describe Republican movements!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That phrase comes courtesy ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
It's been obvious for some time what the plan is...
Posted by: channing on Jul 12, 2007 7:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When in the early going they lost a pallet of cold hard (taxpayer) cash... then a major stock pile of American (taxpayer) weapons... then a bloated and unaccounted for 10's of billions more in savory (taxpayer) contracts to corporate patriots (traitors), then, wow, who'd of thought, al Quaeda (taxpayers) everywhere, a protracted civil conflict is the neocon best bet for keeping all their wonderful (taxpayers) money-laundering war going regardless of the fragile US political/Judicial situation... keep hope alive, the oil law still might pass by some bunkered ruling-class, right?

you know, business in the trillions (taxpayers & consumers) and other priorities

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hey
Posted by: Soxdude7 on Jul 13, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
check out the blog at http://www.mypetpeeves.com/plog/ for great news/opinion/pet peeve conversations!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even in Iceland
Posted by: reinaldok on Jul 13, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just returned from a walking tour of Iceland. There were ten in our group. Two other US citizens and seven from Canada.
Our first night we stopped at a tiny country hotel. The local tv was showing images of the day's activities in Iraq. Same awful scenes we put up with every day here. Right away, one of the Americans began spouting the taudry party line. "We have to give Bush a chance - We must finish our mission." Then the other guy began, "Bush is a good Christian. He knows what's right. He is keeping the Taliban away from our street corners." These two guys would seem to represent the 28% that still believe in the Bushies, the neo-cons and their ilk. I believe that they are our Fifth column and are making it difficult if not impossible to convince the world that most of us do not favor the absurd Iraqi-Afghan situation. We must figure out how to convince our fellow Americans that torturing and killing thousands of Iraqis and the loss of thousands of our troups is not a solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]