Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Leahy: Bush is "Contemptuous of the Congress"

Posted by Bob Geiger at 11:00 AM on July 10, 2007.


Bob Geiger: Judiciary Committee Chairman rips Bush stonewalling
patrickleahy

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, ripped into George W. Bush on Monday after receiving a letter from White House Counsel Fred Fielding stating that Senate subpoenas for documents and staff testimony in the Justice Department political firings would be met with silence and a specious claim of executive privilege.

Directly accusing the Bush administration of having something to hide, Leahy took to the Senate floor and said that his committee's efforts at Congressional oversight have been met with "Nixonian stonewalling that reveals this White House’s disdain for our system of checks and balances."

"This is more stonewalling from a White House that believes it can unilaterally control the other co-equal branches of government," said Leahy. "It raises the question: What is the White House trying to hide by refusing to turn over evidence?"

The Judiciary Committee chairman also pointed out that previous statements made by the White House indicated that the firing of U.S. attorneys was handled solely by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and the Justice Department and that answers for Congress on the issue had to come from Gonzales and his staff -- only to now claim that the investigation should be stymied because of presidential privilege.

"This President and the Attorney General have also from time to time expressed confidence that the Congress would get to the bottom of this as if they did not know the details of what had transpired," said Leahy yesterday. "Are we now to understand from the White House claims of executive privilege that these were decisions made by the President? Is he taking responsibility for this scandal, for the firing of such well-regarded and well performing U.S. attorneys?"

And Leahy was very direct in accusing the Bush administration of using a bogus executive privilege claim to cover for White House political operatives who got involved in a highly-partisan manner with Justice Department personnel decisions.

"Even this White House cannot dispute the evidence we have gathered to date showing that White House officials were heavily involved in these firings and in the Justice Department’s response to congressional inquiries about them.

"The White House continues to try to have it both ways, but at the end of the day it cannot. It cannot block Congress from obtaining the relevant evidence and credibly assert that nothing improper occurred. What is the White House hiding? Was the President involved and were his earlier statements to the American people therefore misleading? Or is this simply an effort by the White House legal team to protect White House political operatives whose partisan machinations have been discovered in a new set of White House horrors?"
The Vermont Senator also made it very clear that he believes the Senate has given the White House many opportunities to cooperate in the investigation and that Bush's “take it or leave it” offers at feigned compliance illustrate an underlying contempt for Congress as a coequal branch of government.

"It is apparent that this White House is contemptuous of the Congress and feels that it does not have to explain itself to anyone-- not to the people’s representatives in Congress, nor to the American people," said Leahy. "I am reluctant to agree to anything that prevents Congress from doing our oversight job effectively. Previous Administrations have found ways to work with Congress – this Administration seems only to obstruct and obfuscate."

Of course, part of Team Bush's phony "negotiations" have involved offering to allow staff to testify before Congress, but only if they don’t have to do it under oath. In other words, as long as they can lie with impunity, this administration has no problem with cooperating.

And Leahy's having none of that.

"This Administration has instituted an abusive policy of secrecy aimed at protecting themselves from embarrassment and accountability," he said. "Apparently the President and Vice president feel they are above the law. In America no one is above the law."

Digg!

Tagged as: senate, leahy, justice department

Bob Geiger is a political writer, specializing in coverage of the United States Senate for AlterNet and other Progressive web sites. You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at BobGeiger.com.


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Inherent Contempt of Congress
Posted by: wagadog on Jul 10, 2007 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Smells like Inherent Contempt of Congress .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice Statements from Leahy...Not much will come of it
Posted by: Rathan47 on Jul 10, 2007 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love Leahy, but usually nothing comes from his blustering. Does anyone remember when he raked Alberto over the coals and demanded answers from the AG about the whole Maher Arar mess (Canadian citizen sent to Syria to be tortured)? Then they left session and nothing ever happened?

And the whole firings mess comes way too late for it to ever make a difference in this administration. They'll stall as long as they can, the White House will refuse to turn over evidence, and when things heat up too much, AG will resign and Bush will promise him the "Scooter" treatment: keep your mouth shut and we'll keep you out of Jail.

And if you think the world will change with the next US election, think again. Bush/Cheney set some new rules for the way things are done, and you can bet that unless someone gets punished big time, the next people in those seats will continue to use those rules as close to the same way as possible.

It's like the "temporary" Income Tax. Once you start getting used to things a certain way, you can be darned sure they won't change unless they are forced to.

And with a corrupt system from head to toe, there's too many people protecting too many other people for anything drastic to happen.

No, what America needs is another Revolution. A mostly peaceful, internal Revolution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]