Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Censuring President Bush

Posted by Guest Blogger at 9:20 AM on July 7, 2007.


Rep. Robert Wexler: I strongly believe that presidential intervention in the Libby case is an unconscionable abuse of authority by George W. Bush.
rosegarden

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Rep. Robert Wexler, originally appeared on The Huffington Post

When Congress returns from the 4th of July recess, I will file a Congressional resolution censuring President George W. Bush for his egregious and politically motivated commutation of Scooter Libby's prison sentence.

I strongly believe that presidential intervention in this case is an unconscionable abuse of authority by George W. Bush. This is a case of a man lying to protect the President from the consequences of an Administration that chose petty political retribution over national security. And these lies are not about some trivial personal issue. These are lies that sent America to war on false pretenses.

Scooter Libby was charged by a special prosecutor appointed by George W. Bush. Libby was found guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice by a jury and was appropriately sentenced by a federal judge, also appointed by President Bush. The conviction and sentencing weren't a grave miscarriage of justice by an out-of-control liberal judiciary that had it in for the Bush Administration. The sentence was appropriate for someone who committed the serious crime of perjury to cover up lies made by this administration, lies that go to the heart of President Bush's decision to send American troops to Iraq without justification.

This deceitful chain of events began with the administration's falsifying of intelligence on Iraqi nuclear capabilities in order to drum up support for an invasion of Iraq. Former Ambassador to Gabon Joseph C. Wilson IV was sent by the Bush Administration in 2002 to investigate reports that Niger had sent material for nuclear weapons and equipment to Iraq and returned without finding any evidence to support such claims. When Wilson spoke out against the Administration's bogus claims, the Bush administration, in an attempt to discredit a career foreign service officer, revealed his wife's identity as a covert CIA agent.

It is clear that the perjury of Mr. Libby in this case effectively protected President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and other administration officials from further scrutiny regarding the clear political retaliation against former Ambassador Wilson and his wife, Valerie Plame Wilson.

Commuting Libby's sentence is nothing short of political quid pro quo, and Congress must go on record in strong opposition. It is fitting that Congress step forward to express the disgust that Americans rightfully feel toward this contemptible decision. Censuring the president makes the unequivocal statement that this abrogation of justice will not be tolerated.

The question should not be whether his corrupt and deceitful actions merit removing him from office. That is its own debate, and one that is not likely to reach a consensus anytime soon. On the other hand, censuring the President for rewarding perjury is a clear cut determination that President Bush has lost sight of the rule of law. Congress has a responsibility to send the unequivocal message that the American people are fed up with an Administration that lacks accountability and holds itself above the law.

Republicans argued during the Clinton impeachment that the issue was not sex but was lying under oath. While I vehemently disagree that impeachment was the appropriate response, this President has gone a step further and rewarded someone for lying about a national security matter to protect him and his Administration. When a senior Bush Administration official has committed a serious crime, President Bush has no business injecting himself in the sentencing determination.

Does the President have the legal authority to commute Libby's prison sentence? Absolutely. Actually, it may be one of the few times in his presidency where Bush is not overstepping his Constitutional authority. The fact remains, however, that this commutation sends the clear message that President Bush values loyalty above the rule of law. And for Congress to give silent approval would be unforgivable.

Digg!

Tagged as: libby, bush, censure, wexler

Robert Wexler is a Democratic member of Congress serving his sixth term in the House of Representatives.


Dems' Godly God-Fest Ends with Prayer by Former Christian Coalition Leader
A leader among the "New Evangelicals."
Post by Joshua Holland. August 29, 2008.
John McCain is Older Than Alaska
23 years older.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. August 29, 2008.
Palin Thinks Hillary is a Whiner
These days Palin is all about praising Hillary's efforts, but she used to sing a different tune.
Post by Melissa McEwan. August 29, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Gee, yah think?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 7, 2007 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trust King George... He's G*d's Crusader, right?


*shudder*



Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
"We, two, form a multitude" ~ Ovid
==
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Bush has lost sight of the rule of law..."
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Jul 7, 2007 2:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Lost Sight?!!" You gotta be kidding me... This pampered little arrogant slimeball never knew what "Law" was in the first place.

All his life has been spent in thumbing his nose at authority while "Daddy" always bails him out. I wonder how daddy's rich friends are going to bail him out of this one?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ask what Dubya's grandfather got as punishment for financing the Nazis!
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jul 7, 2007 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rule of law? He KNOWS from experience and family history that the only "law" in this and most other countries is who you know and how wealthy you are. He also knows the only punishment he'll ever see from Congress is whittling fingers and careful whispers of, "Shame shame". He's an "Elite", born to rule over all others because he's "superior". Why should he pay attention to silly-assed rules designed to control the peons?

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Right wing...
Posted by: bob t on Jul 7, 2007 5:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...scum are the biggest hypocrits of all. Hopefully they will implode or kill each other of and leave the rest of us alone to put America and whats left of the middle east back together again.

Death for profit is their morality. They all and the Rethug party enablers all worship at the altar of death for profit. And they call themselves pro-life, and the party of god(money is their god) and the moral majority. Moral relativism is the only morals the right wingers adhere to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whats one more.
Posted by: osd on Jul 7, 2007 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
G.W. Bush has so may abuses now what is one more. He thumbs his nose at everyone and everything. This will not stop until Cheney and G.W. Bush are Impeached and doing hard time rebuilding Iraq with a spoon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is the least
Posted by: gdonald on Jul 8, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
G W Bush certainly is guilty of breaking many laws. How ever he has the authority to do what he did to Libby. In fact I recall many of Bill Clintons similar actions and he released far more dangerous people back into the public. In fact one such group of criminals that Bill Clinton pardoned actually bombed an NYPD police station.

No, this hooplah over Scooter Libby is just that. The smoke and mirrors to detract from other more serius matters that are going on and it worked. The fools are detraced every time for these Red Herrings. When will they learn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is the least Posted by: flapdoodle
» flapdoodle Posted by: gdonald
This may well be the least of Bushes crimes; but it may be just the straw ...
Posted by: wmGreybeard on Jul 8, 2007 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that breaks the elephants back.

The hornets nest is buzzing.

Congress; get off your derriere and do your duty.

Grassroots; get off your buts and tell your representatives to impeach these criminals!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Censure?
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Jul 8, 2007 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I suppose it's good that Rep. Wexler is taking something of a stand against the Bush administration at this juncture. But for me, this looks more like political theater than an earnest protestation of Bush's misdeeds. Let's not forget that the congressman did vote in favor of authorizing the Iraq war. And (to my knowlege) he has not signed onto HR 333, Rep. Kucinich's bill to impeach Dick Cheney. Rep. Wexler's proposed measure is a paper tiger compared to Rep. Kucinich's response to this administration's flagrant violations of the law. Hopefully Rep. Wexler will find the gravitas to pursue a more serious course of action. We, as a nation, must demonstrate to ourselves and the world around us that the egregious actions committed by this administration elicit more than a slap on the wrist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Censure? Posted by: alternetrose
gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Jul 9, 2007 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Censure? Gee, I am impressed (not)! Democrats! What a bunch of nutless wonders!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CENSURING???? Are you kidding?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jul 9, 2007 3:55 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeachment is a must. Assasination would be preferable. Of both of our "esteemed" leaders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]