Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Beyond Barack's Big Bucks

Posted by Guest Blogger at 5:00 AM on July 2, 2007.


Jerome Armstrong: Barack Obama has raised more primary money than any Democrat has...ever. What does that mean?
obamahillarywinmcnamee
B and Hill

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Jerome Armstrong, originally appeared on MyDD

Obama "raised at least $32.5 million including at least $31 million that we can spend on the battle for the Democratic nomination."

Impressive; I wonder how much came from the internet.

This is an interesting memo that Obama's has released and aimed at his supporters. It's notable that in that it doesn't carry the light language that has been typical coming from the Obama's campaign-- it actually talks a bit tougher and takes on the perceived front-runner status of Clinton (though weirdly referring to her as "the quasi-incumbent" instead of just by name).

Mainly by showing from history that the polls haven't been predictive of whom is going to win the Democratic nomination in the past. But it would also be instructive to add, following Dean in '04, that neither has the one with the most money been who won either. You do have to reach a threshold to win the nomination, but more money doesn't do you any more good in Iowa. In 2003, Kerry needed just $5M the final three months of the campaign to win in Iowa.

The memo also attempts to take on Edwards (though without any poll reference of the claim) by stating over the issue of electability that:

If we prevail in the nomination fight, there is mounting evidence that Barack Obama would be the strongest general election candidate. Barack is consistently the strongest Democrat with independents in general election polling, who are the voters that are the pathway to the presidency. Barack also has a 2-1 fav/unfav with general election voters, which is also the best score in the Democratic field. That strength with independents, plus what would likely be very strong Democratic turnout across the country as a result of an Obama candidacy, also likely puts more states in play. We cannot afford another election where we have to run the table to win the Electoral College.
Indeed.

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, election08, edwards, fundraising

Jerome Armstrong is a regular blogger for MyDD


Polls Are In: People Really Do Hate Joe Lieberman
Also: "Roughly the same number of those polled said they had never heard of Lieberman."
Post by BarbinMD. December 23, 2009.
The Award for Nonexcellance in Climate Journalism Goes To ...
Unfortunately, the list is pretty long.
Post by Dr. Joseph Romm. December 23, 2009.
In (Very Reluctant) "Defense" of the Insurance Mandate
Can we just have a reality-based discussion of the policy?
Post by Joshua Holland. December 23, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?