Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Giuliani ‘More Concerned With Image Than Safety’ During Anthrax Scare

Posted by Guest Blogger at 11:45 AM on June 22, 2007.


Nico Pitney: President Bush’s former EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman acknowledges fault in post-9/11 management but also lays blame at Rudy Giuliani's feet.
Whitman on the Hot Seat

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Nico Pitney, originally appeared on Think Progress

In an interview last night with New York NBC affiliate WNBC, President Bush's former EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman revealed that mayor Rudy Giuliani's administration "appeared to be more concerned with its image than the safety and speedy response of EPA employees in the wake of the 2001 anthrax scare."

Whitman disclosed for the first time that when anthrax letters were sent to NBC headquarters, Giuliani and then-New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik would not allow EPA inspectors to be seen entering the building in their hazmat suits. Instead, a tent had to be set up where they first could change into their gear, "hidden from public view." Whitman said:

There was concern by the city that EPA workers not be seen in their hazmat suits going in because [the city was] still recovering from 9/11. They didn't want this image of a city falling apart. I said, "Well, that's not acceptable, and this is the way we're going to have to do it.

WNBC said Giuliani chose not to respond to the report. It's to your right.

Whitman's revelation puts another hole in the media caricature of Giuliani as a "commanding daddy" who "owns 9-11" and has a "claim to combat" experience from his actions during the terrorist attacks. New York firefighters have repeatedly criticized Giuliani's handling of 9/11, and Jerome Hauer, New York City's first emergency management director, has characterized Giuliani's anti-terrorism record as "deeply flawed."

Digg!

Tagged as: 9/11, anthrax, giuliani, whitman, 9/11 workers

Nico Pitney is the Deputy Research Director for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Those Trying to Blame Immigrants for Wall Street's Failures are Wrong
Motives behind "Blame the Immigrants" game exposed, anti-Latino sentiment underscores extremists' approach.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.
Bill Maher Kicks Zucker's Conservative Ass at the Box Office
The per-screen average of Religulous was three times that of the conservative film An American Carol.
Post by Jane Hamsher. October 6, 2008.
A Desperate McCain Attacks Obama With Vicious Smears
With his campaign flailing, McCain shamelessly tries to manipulate voters by appealing to their 'lizard brains.'
Post by Arianna Huffington. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A mere trifle
Posted by: willymack on Jun 23, 2007 9:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Compared to the fact that he helped thwart FEMA from conducting a REAL investigation of the 9/11 crime scene by supervising the illegal removal of the structural steel from the Twin Towers site. His appearance and deportment are distinctly reptilian. I'll bet cheney loves him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christie Whitman was an ineffectual governor in NJ and
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jun 24, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
had absolutely no qualifications for the job in NYC. She is a rich power-grabber, playing at politics, with not a shred of of knowledge or ability,in the game way over her head. Just like the Bush administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a great surprise !
Posted by: farleya on Jun 24, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a shipyard worker in the 1970's, at the time of the building of the World Trade Center, I was aware of the linking of asbestos to serious respiratory ailments, the production of the asbestos containing fire retardant sprayed on steel used for building, and passage of the asbestos law following the completion of the lower half of the south World Trade Center tower (the recent environmental concerns related to the dismantling of the Deutche Bank building to a large degree result from the greater toxicity of the debris blown into it from the south tower) . ... So I was appalled in the hours and days following 9/11, to watch as rescue workers were shown in nearly every television report working without protection from asbestos and other seriously toxic fiber and chemical substances emanating from “the pile” and over a wide radius from the World Trade Center site. Within one to three days of the tower collapse I called major television and radio news outlets in the New York City area, and the government agencies I felt should be assuming responsibility for worker welfare on the site, to voice my concerns. ... Imagine my "shock" when after identifying myself and explaining my background and reasons for concern to someone in the "New York City Mayor's Office", I was responded to in a tone that made it clear that there was "official awareness of the danger for workers", and told that, " ... We don't really need to be hearing about such things right now... We (the Mayor's Office) will be responding to such (worker safety) issues as the need arises."

In the light of Todd-Whitman's recent accusations regarding the City and Mayor's response to public safety issues as "public image" and "media" issues at that time, it would be most interesting (since many workers were later shown wearing paper masks) to know specifically what cartridge filters were issued to workers, firefighters, and police carrying respirators that were the "best possible" protection against airborne toxins available at that time, provided they were fitted with proper cartridges (?).

So many answerable questions remain unasked and unanswered regarding these events, for a media apparently lacking the will, and a public unwilling to demand answers.

Farley Andrews

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not a great surprise ! Posted by: mr.twitcher