Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How to End the Right Wing Domination Of Talk Radio

Posted by Guest Blogger at 12:27 PM on June 20, 2007.


Faiz Shakir: A new report explores the disparity between progressive and conservative radio talk and what can be done about it.
rushlimbaugh
Got Viagra?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Suzanne Braun Levine SuzanneBraunLevine.com

Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
Amanda Think Progress

Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Steve Benen Washington Monthly

This post, written by Faiz Shakir, originally appeared on Think Progress

The Center for American Progress and Free Press today released the first-ever statistical analysis of the political make-up of talk radio in the United States. It confirms that talk radio, one of the most widely used media formats in America, is dominated almost exclusively by conservatives.

The new report -- entitled "The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio" -- raises serious questions about whether the companies licensed to broadcast over the public radio airwaves are serving the listening needs of all Americans.

While progressive talk is making inroads on commercial stations, right-wing talk reigns supreme on America's airwaves. Some key findings:

- In the spring of 2007, of the 257 news/talk stations owned by the top five commercial station owners, 91 percent of the total weekday talk radio programming was conservative, and only 9 percent was progressive.

- Each weekday, 2,570 hours and 15 minutes of conservative talk are broadcast on these stations compared to 254 hours of progressive talk -- 10 times as much conservative talk as progressive talk.

- 76 percent of the news/talk programming in the top 10 radio markets is conservative, while 24 percent is progressive.

Click for larger version

Two common myths are frequently offered to explain the imbalance of talk radio: 1) the 1987 repeal of the Fairness Doctrine (which required broadcasters to devote airtime to contrasting views), and 2) simple consumer demand. Each of these fails to adequately explain the root cause of the problem. The report explains:

Our conclusion is that the gap between conservative and progressive talk radio is the result of multiple structural problems in the U.S. regulatory system, particularly the complete breakdown of the public trustee concept of broadcast, the elimination of clear public interest requirements for broadcasting, and the relaxation of ownership rules including the requirement of local participation in management. [...]

Ultimately, these results suggest that increasing ownership diversity, both in terms of the race/ethnicity and gender of owners, as well as the number of independent local owners, will lead to more diverse programming, more choices for listeners, and more owners who are responsive to their local communities and serve the public interest.

Along with other ideas, the report recommends that national radio ownership not be allowed to exceed 5 percent of the total number of AM and FM broadcast stations, and local ownership should not exceed more than 10 percent of the total commercial radio stations in a given market.

Read the full report here.

Digg!

Tagged as: conservatives, media, radio

Faiz Shakir is the Research Director for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jun 20, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... even if you don't care about lowering your standards of thoughtfulness and intelligence to pander to "talk radio", this should be a wakeup call to start denouncing every single pundit or person who claims that the conservative viewpoint is not allowed into the "liberal" media or is underrepresented.

Stop letting them get away with that lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not so much on government regulating citizen's expression. Something strikes me...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 20, 2007 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as decidedly Bushy about giving an unelected commission free(er) reign over what thoughts and consideration of the people "deserve" airtime.

It's amazing to me that some folks look at what this administration has done and rather than consider undoing those abuses of power, their wheels begin to spin on what a positively yummy autocrat they'd make...with just enough additional power to force damn people to think correctly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Astute Observation! Posted by: grumble-bum
» Answers! Posted by: ABetterFuture
» I...err...well....I...err... Posted by: ABetterFuture
We need to nationalise radio stations. Take away FCC give-aways and for-profit
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 20, 2007 4:09 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
auctions for bandwidth and frequencies. Take the profit motive away and make ALL frequencies public-only. Obviously some frequencies will be available for law enforcement, fire stations, EMS support, and military channels. Also, there would be one decaded bandwidth for cell phones but this would be a national cell phone company with profits going to providing poor people and undocumented workers cell phones and internet access. But all the TV and Radio bandwidth should be nationalised and a board appointed by Congress should determine the programming based on polling data and minority interest. No commericals allowed (although public service adverts are allowed and encouraged if they are properly vetted). Extraneous programming that takes away interest from the collective interest and progress towards national socialism. Sports, talk shows, and variety programming is bourgeoisie entertainment and does not further the working class goals and will be banned except in such cases (determined on an individual basis) where they further the cause.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one listens to Air America...........
Posted by: kbest on Jun 21, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it failed once and it will fail again. It cannot make any money.
Talk radio is the alternative to the very obvious liberal slant on all the networks, almost all of the newspapers in this country, Newsweek, Time, Vanity Fair, New Yorker and don't forget NPR.

So now the target is talk radio and Fox News. You can't defeat the message with ideas and positions, so you want to defeat the messenger. Well it isn't gonna happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kb
Posted by: kb on Jun 21, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not "conservative" talk radio, it's an 18 hr a day commercial for the Republican Party here in Utah, interrupted only by product commercials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

_AH_
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Jun 21, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I encourage all people to boycott those stations and the companies/products that sponsor them. After all money talks and bulls___ walks. The Republican administration now owns the largest Pawn Shop in America, so those who want to hock their souls can do so. Fight back America, stand up for your rights!!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boycott right wing talk show sponsors
Posted by: red_cloud_ocean on Jun 21, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On a local level, we should listen to identify which local businesses are advertising on the right wing talk shows and not simultaneously advertising on Air America, and call up their managers to say that we will not eat/shop at their locations because of their political bias. I did this once and the business pulled their advertisement. Can you imagine what would happen if many of us did this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A great alternative.....
Posted by: tooldoc60 on Jun 21, 2007 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...would be to listen to radio IQ. BBC news, NPR talk. The best!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't listen to talk radio of any political persuasion. Why? It lacks
Posted by: poppop_schell on Jun 21, 2007 1:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
objectivity, depth and true dialogue. Unfortaunely, AlterNet is NOT much better because so many posters simply call names. That is sad.

Radio programs make money via advertising. Advertisers if they wish to be profitable have their ear to the ground in terms of what political issues are of most concern to the most people. There are some advertsiers who will spend money for causes whether it makes "sense" or not but they are fairly rare.

Folks, the facts are that outside big city America on the two coasts, most people are pretty conservative. Unfortuanelty, Progressives attack many conservative Constitutional political and moral values which isn't the way to get people to listen and change. New "citizen sensitive" strategies need to be developoed and used. Otherwise, you will simply keep "talking to the choir" and let out your anger and frustrations.

Our Congresscritters listen rarely to the people unless we SCREAM at them and then only when a 2006 election occurs and then maybe not even then. Talk radio is many people's only perceived alternative to this total lack of regard for people by our congresscritters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And another thing... Posted by: lessbread
Time to re-instate the Fairness Doctrine,
Posted by: james2021 on Jun 21, 2007 5:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The repeal of the Fairness Doctrine was Saint Ronald's gift to the Conservatives and Religious Right. Intended to stifle their lock on the media.

The Airwaves are public property, and a broadcast license is a privledge, not a right, to air fair and honest material over the PUBLIC airwaves. This is an anathma to any one that they would have to air opposing views.

Time to re-instate the Fairness Doctrine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]