Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Vetoes Stem Cell Research Bill: Far Right 2, Science and Humanity 0

Posted by Adam Howard at 11:31 AM on June 20, 2007.


Adam Howard: Bush reminds us all of how hateful he is by rejecting stem cell research for the second time.
2
So self-satisfied it makes you sick

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Bush is so stingy with his veto pen, except for when it comes to legislation that will actually help people:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush on Wednesday vetoed legislation to expand federally funded embryonic stem cell research, triggering an uphill battle in the Democratic-led Congress to override him.

Two-thirds majority votes would be needed in the Senate and House of Representatives to overcome Bush's opposition and make the bill law, and backers conceded they are short of support.

In addition to vetoing such legislation for the second time in two years, Bush issued an executive order to encourage scientists to work with the federal government to derive new methods to obtain stem cells without harming human embryos.

That right folks, instead of using an executive order to do something useful like overturning "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" so Arabic translators can do their job in Iraq, Bush uses it to set back science...yet again.

Critics called the presidential order a sham and said he should have signed into law the stem-cell bill, which polls show is backed by more than 60 percent of American voters who see the measure as a way combat a host of illnesses.

"President Bush isn't fooling anyone with this executive order; and the fact that it doesn't change the policy adds insult to injury for the millions of patients who suffer every day," said Sean Tipton of the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, a nonpartisan advocacy group that represents more than 100 patient and scientific organizations.

I'm guessing that 60 percent have just been unreasonably influenced by the liberal media right? And everyone knows the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research is a Democratic front group!

The president and other critics condemn the legislation as morally offensive because it would lead to destruction of human embryos to derive stem cells.

"If this legislation became law, it would compel American taxpayers -- for the first time in our history -- to support the deliberate destruction of human embryos," the White House said. "The president has made it clear ... that he will not allow the nation to cross this moral line."

No comment. The emphasis in the next graph is mine...

Backers note the legislation would only permit scientists to use embryos left over from fertility treatments that would otherwise be discarded. They also say it could clear the way for possible medical breakthroughs that could help millions of people suffering with debilitating diseases.

What part of that do stem cell research opponents not understand?

Shortly after Bush took office in 2001, he allowed federal funding on 78 stem cell lines then in existence. Most turned out to be of limited use to scientists, who have urged the president to lift his restrictions.

Democrats promised to push to expand federally funded stem cell research in winning control of Congress from Bush's Republicans last year, and it may be an issue again next year when U.S. voters elect a new Congress and president.

(Additional reporting by Matt Spetalnick, Caren Bohan and Jeremy Pelofsky

Sigh...

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, science, stem cell research

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


Those Trying to Blame Immigrants for Wall Street's Failures are Wrong
Motives behind "Blame the Immigrants" game exposed, anti-Latino sentiment underscores extremists' approach.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.
Bill Maher Kicks Zucker's Conservative Ass at the Box Office
The per-screen average of Religulous was three times that of the conservative film An American Carol.
Post by Jane Hamsher. October 6, 2008.
A Desperate McCain Attacks Obama With Vicious Smears
With his campaign flailing, McCain shamelessly tries to manipulate voters by appealing to their 'lizard brains.'
Post by Arianna Huffington. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cretinism Continues
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on Jun 20, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stem cell research is extremely promising in treating heart muscle repair, brain cell damage, spinal chord damage, and many new promising treatments. The most poetic and ironic event that could happen to this dimwit president and all of his thugs who voted against this bill would be to receive heart or brain damage which could have been mitigated by stem cell research. Portents of an early death for these cretins will spare any further generations of their offspring!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It seems a neocon truism
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jun 20, 2007 12:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that it's only okay to "murder babies" if they're brown and their parents happened to breed over some oil we want. Then it's okay even if they're toddling around. Pfui! When are we going to stop expecting reason of any sort other than insane from this administration?

I've had nerve damage and been in constant pain for 23 years - unnecessarily. With no record of any sort, since I presented with pain, I just HAD to be in for drugs, and it took over ten years to get the first of 6 back operations - too late. On top of that, because I'm still in pain, my VA chart is still flagged with "Drug Seeking Behavior". They say they'll remove it when I quit showing the behavior (being in pain). The ONLY hope, I'm told, is stem cell research.

Here's an article you might find interesting:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/6/5/82950/29569

Thanks again, Uncle Sam.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It seems a neocon truism Posted by: rainingwolf
What else can be expected
Posted by: charemor on Jun 20, 2007 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from the idiot in chief? The thing that I have the biggest problem with is how some people, including the Deceiver in Chief can be opposed to stem cell research because it destroys life, yet have no problems with destroying thousands of lives in Iraq. I agree with an earlier posting; it would be beautiful justice if Bush and his family were to develop health problems that might have been cured with stem cell research.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What else can be expected Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: What else can be expected Posted by: VZEQICVA
BUSH, THE HUMANITARIAN
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 20, 2007 2:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He values life and won't destroy it. Or so he tells us. I'd like to know whose? Not our military, not the Iraqis, not the people in New Orleans, and certainly not the millions of chronically sick adults and children who we know can be helped if stem cell research is allowed to progress. He values his own selfish life and his precious Presidential VETO (his big stick). Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bush-Clinton Dynastic Order still is in agreement. One wonders if
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 20, 2007 4:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they both have invested money (maybe through their hedge-fund interests) in over-seas research companies or stem-cell patents. Once again Bush Jr, is doing the bidding of Bill Clinton as ordered by Bush Sr. Follow the money people. To wit: (from Clinton's press release)
THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary


--For Immediate Release December 2, 1994
Statement by the President

The Director of the National Institutes of Health has received a recommendation regarding federal funding of research on human embryos. The subject raises profound ethical and moral questions as well as issues concerning the appropriate allocation of federal funds. I appreciate the work of the committees that have considered this complex issue and I understand that advances in in vitro fertilization research and other areas could derive from such work. However, I do not believe that federal funds should be used to support the creation of human embryos for research purposes, and I have directed that NIH not allocate any resources for such research. In order to ensure that advice on complex bioethical issues that affect our society can continue to be developed, we are planning to move forward with the establishment of a National Bioethics Advisory Commission over the next year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not Bush but Clinton?? Posted by: zipper696
Projecting life
Posted by: RobNLA on Jun 20, 2007 6:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well Bush supposedly feels that promoting stell cell research would lead to a slippery slope that could encourage abortion down the road to promote science and medicine.

But the reality is Bush's veto is just him catering to the religious right. That's the Republican base and he has to keep up appearances for the party.

You'll see Republican candidates for president doing the same thing, and the religious right will love it, even though it makes no sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if it was really about "life"
Posted by: somegirl on Jun 23, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they would be banning fertility treatments so there were no cells to dispose of in the first place

the 28 percenters are just too stupid to realize those cells just go in the garbage anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]