Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hillary Gets Booed for Blaming the War on Iraqis

Posted by Guest Blogger at 9:10 AM on June 20, 2007.


Andre Banks: Hillary Clinton's speech at the Take Back America conference was at its worst racist and at its best, calculated theater.
vert.hillary.clinton.ap
Hill

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Andre Banks, originally appeared on Race Wire

Well, after her speech this morning, one thing is clear: Hilary Clinton is trying to win this election. Even if she rides to the White House on the white horse of racism.

The Senator led with all the right talking points: more stem cell research, pre-K for kids, universal healthcare. Unfortunately, her delivery, as always, reeked more of an "everything must go" discount salesperson than an inspired and credible leader. This morning it seems she's taken instruction in the art of lying effectively, dispassionately and with miraculous self-righteousness. Like Barack, it was uninspiring political theater.

But one critical difference between the two junior Senators is that Barack, despite other failures, refuses to stoke American racism in a desperate quest to create scapegoats and pull votes. Sen. Clinton, alternatively, is well prepared to join that oldest of American political traditions: relying on racism, sometimes subtle and sometimes not, to get white people's support at the expense of Black and other people of color's lives and livelihoods.

So Hilary gets to that "bring the troops home now(ish)" moment that all the candidates have nuanced into pure confusion. And when she gets to why our troops should be pulled out of Iraq, she introduces a really innovative idea. It went something like this: The American military, in the Clinton imagination, has "done its job" in Iraq. Valiantly, they liberated the people from Saddam and gave the Iraqi government a "chance" to take control. But now, because the Iraqi's have failed to stand up to fix their own country (you know, the one with the city-sized U.S. embassy sitting smack in the middle), it's time to bring the troops home.

**Commence Shouting**

Blaming the Iraqi's for the mess in their country is beyond ignorant. Our country, the U.S.A, has invested half a trillion dollars to turn that nation into an unmitigated disaster - completely undermining real local leadership, rendering the nation nearly unlivable for Iraqis and impossibly dangerous for the foot soldiers forced to patrol the occupation. But why? Why would an intelligent and informed Senator and Presidential candidate tell this story to a room full of (mostly) white progressives?

Because she knows her version of "bring the troops home" will play in an America committed to its deeply racist imagination. Her story of a successful military operation rendered a failure by the intransigence of Iraqi's who don't love democracy like we do, relieves the American conscious from the guilt becoming a war of terror. And in its place she leaves a racist stereotype our nation is accustomed to: a lawless Brown person who deserves to be abandoned to their uncontrollable vice.

She got jeered. But in the end, the applause ruled the room - no doubt because her campaign filled the room with staff to prevent the shouting-down she got at this conference last year. Clinton laughed as the shouting subsided - it's all robust debate, right?

Wrong. It's racist and it's calculated. And an example of the kind of politics that Took Over America in the first place.

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, iraq war, election08, take back america

Andre Banks is the associate publisher of ColorLines and the editor of the magazine's blog, RaceWire.org.


Oh No! The Dictionary Has a Liberal Bias!
Is nothing sacred?
Post by Roy Edroso. July 5, 2009.
Amid 2012 Hopefuls' Career Implosions, Future Looks Bleak for GOP
Where are they going from here?
Post by Booman. July 5, 2009.
Yes Men Say No to Jerusalem Film Festival
The famous political pranksters withdraw latest flick in support of divestment movement.
Post by Staff. July 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Iraq War Hypocrisy
Posted by: LessThanExpert on Jun 20, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sen. Clinton was not booed at the 'Take Back America' conference because of her statements on the War in Iraq. She was booed because she supports a strategy of staged withdrawal and continued support to the Iraqi government and because she doesn't apologize for her Iraq War vote.

The extreme wing of the anti-war movement labels anyone who doesn't support precipitous withdrawal from Iraq as a "sellout," even though such a withdrawal would, in all likelihood, lead to even more violence in that country. They cover they're position uttering total nonsense, like that democracy and sectarian peace is only possible once U.S. troops are withdrawn...you'd have to be totally deluded to think that.

Senator Clinton is wrong to blame the Iraqis for their problems. The Iraqis have been victimized by weak leadership, but they live in a failed state, which is why pressure on the Iraqi government to produce results is a fool's errand unless there is also support for institution-building in the country.

But this has been a common theme from many Democrats and some Republicans on the War, and it has been echoed by Gov. Richardson, Sen. Dodd and even Sen. Edwards, all of them beloved by various segments of the anti-war Left.

A rapid withdrawal from Iraq, the kind most of the people at the TBA conference would support, would result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of Iraqis. So maybe they should be booed.

But then again I'm Less Than Expert.

www.lessthanexpert.wordpress.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Iraq War Hypocrisy Posted by: jareilly
?
Posted by: trampoline on Jun 20, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who wrote this crap, John Edwards's campaign manager?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lame
Posted by: sui_generis on Jun 20, 2007 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is completely stupid in its premise.

As a "brown person," allow me to be the first to educate you that NOT EVERYTHING is about race.

She used a talking point that's been beaten to death for years now. Is it stupid? Yes. Is it insulting to the Iraqi people, considering our actions there? Certainly. But is it about "brown people"? No, of course not.

The sooner we get over trying to make EVERYTHING about race, the easier it will be to actually address situations where it IS about race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» p.s. Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: lame Posted by: Tacticsb
» RE: lame Posted by: noel