Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rumsfeld's Abu Ghraib Cover-Up Revealed

Posted by Adam Howard at 7:39 PM on June 17, 2007.


Adam Howard: A new Seymour Hersh article proves that Rumsfeld lied to Congress about when he knew about torture in Abu Ghraib. Now, what exactly did Bush know?
480pxantoniom.taguba
Taguba

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Thank God for Seymour Hersh.

In his most recent New Yorker exposé, he reveals the true story of what Rumsfeld knew and when he knew it with regards to the Abu Ghraib scandal, and his source is no partisan pundit with an ax to grind, it's the author of the report which opened up the whole torture can of worms: General Antonio Taguba.

According to Taguba, when first confronted with the extensive, documented evidence of torture at Abu Ghraib (including the story of a father and son forced to perform lewd acts on one another), all Rumsfeld and his lackeys appeared to be concerned with was how the story had been leaked to the press.

Taguba has told Hersh his story because, like many Americans, he was appalled by Donald Rumsfeld and the entire Bush Administration's early stubborn refusal to address torture in their military's midsts and then their pathetic attempt to plead ignorance and cover up their involvement in said torture when it became public.

Also, on a personal level, Taguba became something like a Serpico figure amongst his fellow soldiers, a pariah because he gave an honest, thorough accounting of military misdeeds. At one point, Taguba was cryptically warned by General John Abizaid. "You and your report will be investigated," he said. When Rumsfeld first met Taguba in May of '04 he made no attempt to disguise his contempt:

"Here . . . comes . . . that famous General Taguba--of the Taguba report!" Rumsfeld declared, in a mocking voice. The meeting was attended by Paul Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld's deputy; Stephen Cambone, the Under-Secretary of Defense for Intelligence; General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (J.C.S.); and General Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, along with Craddock and other officials. Taguba, describing the moment nearly three years later, said, sadly, "I thought they wanted to know. I assumed they wanted to know. I was ignorant of the setting."
Taguba was discouraged every step of the way during his investigation. He knew no one in their right mind could really, truly believe that this was all the work of a few sadistic grunts. The leashes and other instruments of torture were provided by someone, most likely military intelligence, who got their torture mandate from guess who. Yet the White House took the stand that this was a small problem and the majority of the media eventually fell in line.

Only seven soldiers were convicted on charges relating to the torture, while one of its ringleaders, Specialist Charles Graner, got ten years in prison. Gen. Taguba was pushed into retirement earlier this year after over thirty years of dedicated, unassailable military service. The man put in charge of cleaning up the Abu Ghraib mess, Major General Geoffrey Miller (who has his own torture legacy back in Guantanamo), never even met with Taguba. In Hersh's article, Taguba's rage about all this jumps of the page and it's contagious:
"The whole idea that Rumsfeld projects--'We're here to protect the nation from terrorism'--is an oxymoron," Taguba said. "He and his aides have abused their offices and have no idea of the values and high standards that are expected of them. And they've dragged a lot of officers with them."

Amen brother...What worries me about this whole story is that after the initial shockwave comes and goes, it will eventually disappear from most people's minds, much like the initial Abu Ghraib fallout did.

There is a fundamental amount of misinformation out there about who the individuals being tortured were. My guess is that most Americans assume they were terrorists--although Taguba found in his investigation that they were often teenagers, women, old people, just folks rounded up off the street, who were considered "suspicious" for one reason or another.

Many Republicans, as the early debates have shown, have warmed up to the idea of torture as "necessary". An ugly part of an ugly war. Some of us on the Left may simply say, "Well of course Rumsfeld lied, no surprise there. And anyway, he's gone now, so what does it matter?" Others may just not want to see those disgusting photos on the 6 o'clock news again.

I say this story is not resolved and it will never be until the President and his minions come clean. The simple fact is that a system of torture has become commonplace in our military. Not only is that illegal but it is profoundly, morally wrong. We will endure decades of hatred and we've created enemies for a lifetime because of horrendous actions taken in our country's name under someone else's orders.

We now know the former Secretary of Defense knew this and allowed it to continue. If President Bush knew about this earlier than he's acknowledged, and I think he did, then we need to force him to take responsibility and we need to force him to accept the consequences.

Digg!

Tagged as: hersh, torture, bush administration, rumsfeld, taguba

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


Lieberman's Latest B.S. Excuse for Opposing Health Reform
Another month, another justification.
Post by Steve Benen. November 23, 2009.
Glenn Beck Has a 'Plan' to Sell Books With March On Washington on the Anniversary of MLK Speech
Glenn Beck announced that he was crafting "a 100 year plan."
Post by Matt Corley. November 23, 2009.
Hard-liners Peddle Zombie Lies About Immigrants and Crime
A new report flies in the face of 100 years of data showing immigrants are less likely to commit serious crimes than the native-born.
Post by Walter Ewing. November 22, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?