Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Behind the "I Got a Crush...On Obama" Video

Posted by Guest Blogger at 7:04 AM on June 14, 2007.


Karen Russell: A new, risqué web video should force candidates to ask themselves, how should campaigns respond to voter generated content?
obamavideo
video

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Karen Russell, originally appeared on The Huffington Post

If you are running for President, how do you respond intelligently and effectively to "tribute videos and ads" like the new risqué "I Got A Crush.... On Obama" video? Should a campaign always distance itself from these types of ads or videos? Is "no comment" and "we didn't do it" the only viable responses to voter generated ads?

"I Got A Crush...On Obama"

Apparently Obamagirl, missed the new "smart girls" like Obama and "girls with needs" like Hilary poll:

Clinton is drawing especially strong support from lower-income, lesser-educated women -- voters her campaign strategists describe as "women with needs." Obama, by contrast, is faring better among highly educated women, who his campaign says are interested in elevating the political discourse.

Obamagirl is very open with her "needs" when it comes to Obama. There's a lot of audacity in her hope as she sings about her crush on Obama. ABC News describes the video's open:

"Hey, 'B,' it's me," a woman who calls herself "Obamagirl" murmurs amorously into a phone at the beginning of the slow jam. "If you're there, pick up. I was just watching you on C-SPAN."

The song and video (which can be seen HERE) goes on to poke racy fun at the way some voters have responded viscerally to both Obama's charisma and the personal nature of his political appeal.

"You seemed to float onto the floor/Democratic convention 2004/I never wanted anybody more/than I want you," Obamagirl coos.

"Baby, I cannot wait/til 2008/Baby, you're the best candidate," she continues as she walks around New York City in various stages of undress, occasionally posing near life-size pictures of the lanky senator from Illinois.

Obama's campaign responds:

An Obama campaign official said its team had nothing to do with the video, but otherwise declined to comment.

Real or Fake? This video is "fake". Does that matter?

"I Got A Crush...On Obama" is a political version of "Lonely Girl". Obamagirl is an actress hired to have a crush on Obama.

ABC News continues:

As much as the news may break the hearts of thousands of Democratic men, Obamagirl, in reality, is not the pulchritudinous callipygian who riffs on policy with Akon-esque beats, singing "you're into border security/let's break this border between you and me/universal health care reform/it makes me warm."

Rather, she is a fictitious creation.

The song was performed by Leah Kauffman, a 21-year-old undergraduate at Temple University in Philadelphia, who wrote the lyrics with a friend, 32-year-old advertising executive Ben Relles, and the music with her producer, Rick Friedrich.

An actress/model named Amber Lee Ettinger then lip-synched the song for the video, shot by filmmakers found on Craigslist two hours before Relles and Ettinger hit New York City one Friday in May to shoot the video on a DV camera.

"Not including the hours we spent working on it, it probably cost a couple thousand dollars," said Relles, a graduate of the Wharton School of Business, who said he did it for fun, not money, but is also selling "Obamagirl" and "I Got a Crush on Obama" T-shirts.
...

Relles said his team had no contact at all with the Obama campaign. "We hope it helps him, though," he adds.

Do these ads help or hurt? How can we tell if the ad comes from a friend or a foe? Does it matter?

Help is in the eye of the beholder. Does this video help or hurt Obama? There are bound to be many reactions:

* That's funny!

* That's not funny!

* Hilary is behind that smear.

* Young girls like Obama, not Hilary.

* It's Bill Clinton's fault.

* I bet Obama is secretly courting the hottie vote.

* That video is racist.

* That video isn't racist.

* That Obama 1984 ad was better.

* I prefer McCain's "Bomb Iran" video, etc.

Did the 1984 ad help or hurt Obama? Help or hurt Hilary?

Did the 1984 Obama ad mystery that was solved on Huffpo here ultimately help or hurt Obama? Help or hurt Hilary?

W.W.H.R.D? What Would Huffpo Readers Do?

If you ran a Presidential campaign, what would you do? Will voter generated content always be a lose-lose for campaigns? How can campaigns handle and perhaps harness the power of voter generated content? Are these ads and videos better than what the pros are creating?

What say you?

Digg!

Tagged as: video, internet, obama, election08

A graduate of Harvard Law School, Karen Russell is an on-air legal analyst and frequently appears on CNN, MSNBC and CourtTV -- as a legal and political analyst dissecting high-profile trials and debating national political issues.


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WOULD LIKE TO SEE AN IN DEPTH DIALOGUE ON THIS TOPIC
Posted by: Christie on Jun 14, 2007 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“An Obama campaign official said his/her team had nothing to do with the video, but otherwise declined to comment.” I believe this is absolutely the only approach for any candidate to take. This is presuming that the video or ad does not contain lies or slander, which this ad apparently does not. However, by insinuating that the girl has a personal relationship with the candidate, the ad, in my opinion, borders on being a lie. We certainly had enough lies in the 2004 campaign. The public and the media should indicate in any ways we can that anything that even borders on truthiness instead of the truth will be considered by us detrimental to that candidate or to the supporters of the other candidate who generated the misleading or harmful information or ad.
The ones who produced this ad say they hope it helps. Comments within the article indicate that some people may feel it hurts this candidate. That is probably as close to a draw as any candidate can expect. However, the candidates as a group might indicate that they feel it can be misleading if not actually harmful if an outside group produces an ad and, therefore, they prefer that any supporters speak out in their own names. The supporters -- and opponents -- are free to exercise their right to free speech, of course, and we need that in a democracy. Maybe both supporters and detractors or opponents of candidates would be well advised to be aware that the public is completely fed up with lies connected in any way to or about our elected officials and candidates. Further, ad homonem comments, whether positive or negative, should be avoided. We would like to hear and be engaged in discussion of policy on all the significant topics.

I will be interestd to check back later to see what others have to say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SUBSTANCE INSTEAD OF SILLINESS
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Jun 14, 2007 9:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE U.S.of A. IS IN VERY SAD SHAPE DUE TO THE UNBELIEVABLE NIGHTMARE THAT HAS TAKEN OVER OUR COUNTRY.
THERE IS ONLY ONE CANDIDATE WHO GENUINELY CARES ABOUT HIS FELLOW MAN AND THAT MAN IS JOHN EDWARDS.
WE HAVE THE ADVANTAGE OF STUDYING ALL CANDIDATES ON THE UINTERNET. JOHN EDWARDS BECAME A MILLIONAIRE BY HELPING THE UNDERDOG. NO OTHER CANDIDATE CAN MAKE THAT CLAIM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]