Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

NASA's Great Global Warming White-Out

Posted by Guest Blogger at 1:31 PM on June 8, 2007.


Josh Dorner: NASA has a new mission and it is no longer "to understand and protect our home planet."

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This is a guest post from Josh Dorner of the Sierra Club.

As if his idiotic statements about global warming last week on NPR weren't quite enough, we got more hot air this week from NASA Administrator Michael Griffin.

First, Griffin reprised a tried (tired?) and true Beltway tactic of simply blaming the media for reporting the stupid things that stupid people say.  I mean, how dare they report controversial comments on matters of pressing global concern from individuals at the highest levels of government!?  The nerve of those uppity do-gooders at NPR!

Second, Griffin tried to "clarify" his remarks by pointing to NASA's mission statement, commenting "It is not NASA's mission to make policy regarding possible climate change mitigation strategies."  What he conveniently forgot to mention is that NASA's mission statement used to include the sentence "[t]o understand and protect our home planet."  That line was often cited by the preeminent climate scientist Dr. James Hansen as the rationale for his important work on global warming -- the same work that NASA officials repeatedly tried to stifle or suppress. 

And how exactly was that part of NASA's mission sent the way of the glaciers you ask?  Why, it was quietly removed in February 2006 on the orders of none other than…wait for it…NASA Administrator Michael Griffin!  Ohhh, sneaky that one!

Finally, the administration went 3-for-3 by announcing that it was pulling the funding for a badly-needed new set of satellites to monitor the Earth's changing climate.  Instead, we'll have to rely on data from Europe.  (You know, the same Europeans whose climate deal we torpedoed at the G-8 this week). 

Next thing you know, the EPA's going to justify itself by following Stephen Colbert's advice and removing the words "Environmental" and "Protection" from its name. (Video here.)   

 

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, global warming


The Fraud Of Fraud
The process of turning ACORN into a terrorist sleeper cell has begun and I see little hope that they aren't going to be successful.
Post by Digby. October 11, 2008.
Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Political Appointee
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jun 12, 2007 12:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mike Griffin is a political appointee. That means he is paid to
know nothing and say whatever the president wants him to
say. Political appointees are one thing that is wrong with the
government. For example, they are how the army got rifles
that were guaranteed to jam during the Viet Nam war.
Political appointees are in charge of things they know nothing
about. Mike Griffin is a lot smarter than most, but he also
knows he is required to act out the script given to him by his
boss, the president. We would be better of with 7 rather than
7000 political appointees. Until that happens, if ever, just
consider anything a political appointee says as being what it
is: the president's words coming from another mouth. It is
part of the drama presented to you by whoever is the real
script writer and string puller.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]