Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Steeplejacking

Posted by Guest Blogger at 6:00 AM on June 8, 2007.


Lindsay Beyerstein: It seems as if the main reason we don't have a more powerful religious left in this country is because of sabotage by the religious right, not hostility from the secular left.
535036598e5f072aab2
Steeplejacking

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Lindsay Beyerstein, originally appeared on Majikthise

In their new book Steeplejacking United Church of Christ Ministers John Dorhauer and Sheldon Culver describe the organized efforts of the religious right to silence the members of the religious left within mainline Protestant churches.

The Institute on Religion and Democracy was founded in 1981 by conservative Democrats who realized that liberal elements in the mainline Protestant churches had been among the most powerful opponents of hawkish American foreign policy. Over the years, the Institute has been very successful in turning the flocks of liberal pastors against them.

The IRD uses wedge issues to sow dissent within congregations. In the old days, the IRD used accusations of Communist sympathy to discredit pastors who agitated for peace in Central America. These days, the steeplejackers are more likely to focus on social issues like gay rights and women's ordination. Not surprisingly, the hot new wedge is to levy accusations of Islamofascist sympathy against pastors who speak out against the occupation of Iraq or take a more eccumenical approach to theology.

The tactics vary by denomination. As Culver explained, litigation is a preferred weapon for the more hierarchical denominations. She said that more and more often the goal is not to win a theological argument but to punish overly liberal churches by seizing their property through the courts or draining their resources in litigation.

Independent churches like the UCC are harder to sue, so they are often targeted one-by-one. Specially trained activists show up and launch campaigns to convince parishioners to vote themselves out of the UCC.

Steeplejacking is the product of firsthand experience. As ministers in the United Church of Christ, Dorhauer and Culver started encountering bizarre propaganda leaflets making the same outlandish claims about the UCC, for example, that the UCC doesn't believe in God or accept the authority of Jesus. Eventually, the authors realized that what they thought was isolated crackpottery was actually a well-organized campaign to take over more liberal churches and replace the pastors with more conservative political and social views.

Secular Democrats are often blamed for marginalizing the religious left. As I'm constantly trying to tell people, that blame is misplaced. It's not secular Democrats who are driving liberal pastors out of their churches and replacing them with hardline Republican-friendly conservatives!

If the central claims of Steeplejacking are correct, it seems as if the main reason we don't have a more powerful religious left in this country is because of sabotage by the religious right, not hostility from the secular left.

I'm looking forward to reading the book. Dorhauer and Culver certainly gave an engaging presentation.

Digg!

Tagged as: religion, religious left, religious conservatives

Lindsay Beyerstein is a New York-based photojournalist and national correspondent for Raw Story. Her work has appeared in TIME, Salon, AlterNet, and other publications. She blogs at Majikthise.


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It Explains What Happened at the Church Where I was a Member
Posted by: Arlene on Jun 8, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was the chair of the Social Action Committee at my local UCC church years ago and was working to implement the resultions from the Board of Homeland Ministries. This was during the Reagan era. A couple of men called me on the carpet for doing this. I left because I didn't need any more drama in my life. Now I confine my religion activities to taunting the wingnuts from the sidelines. I don't attend church anymore unless its for a wedding or funeral.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Secret to Defeating the Religious Right is to Study the Enlightenment
Posted by: gr_pramenko on Jun 8, 2007 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those in the United Church of Christ and in other mainline Protestant churches need to get in touch with The Scottish Enlightenment, and get in touch with the writings of Ben Franklin, Thomas Paine, Jefferson, Madison, John Marshall, and in touch with the views of two anti-Calvinists: John Adams and Ethan Allen.

Then as a result of finding and studying the ideas of these 18th Century "Christian Deists" & secular moderates, those who wish to be Christian moderates, liberals or progressives will also want to advance ideas about "popular, secular, self-rule" to provide a basis for their mailine beliefs and a basis for the arguments necessary to defend the combination of these great beliefs!

They will have to defend both the teachings of Jesus (not necessarily the deism of Jesus), and defend the ideas of the Scottish Enlightenment Thinkers, simultaneously!

They then will be holding on to the moderate teachings of our nation's Statescrafters and Leaders who abided by the teachings of both...Jesus and The Englightenment!

Jefferson and Madison led the way...along with Thomas Paine, George Washington, Ben Franklin, John Adams, Wilson and James Mason. Like Franklin, "one then does
not dogmatize over the diety of Jesus!" That is left quietly to your own thoughts!

Founders like Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams albeit they helped found this nation, had little understanding or appreciation for the teachings of John Locke, David Hume, Puffendorf, Hutchison and Burlamaque, or appreciated what the French Enlightenment thinkers, Rousseau & Voltaire, had to say!

Patrick Henry in fact wanted an "official religion" for this new nation! That was anathema to much of what the American Revolutionary War was about!

And from another historical point of view, one must also remember that it was Napoleon, in France, who took it upon himself to "Champion the ideas of The Englightenment in Europe!" This common interest in The Enlightenment between Jefferson and Napoleon undoubtedly helped lead to the cooperation between them necessary for the Louisiana Purchase!

GP, Center for Early American History, Arvada, CO 80002

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a Unitarian Universalist, I expected a free and open exchange of ideas,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jun 8, 2007 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but then I was told by members of the board of my church that George Bushit could retract our tax exempt designation if he felt we were too "political"-meaning criticizing him. There are a few Republicans in our congregation, and of course the door is always open. Apparently there are no religious oriented anti-Bushit religious establishments allowed under this Nazi regime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen! Posted by: johngary66
TO THE SANE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
Posted by: Roverton on Jun 8, 2007 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pitch in and help humanity, here. We don't want to die just because of the HUGE faction within your religion which believes the rest of us don't matter.

What kind of true Christian would allow a hateful monster like this to be unleashed upon their neighbors and children?

Why is this the rest of America's problem?

It is right and just for all who call themselves Christians to bear the greater responsibility cleansing their own house. The burden has already been unfairly placed upon us for far too long. We aren't the threat to Christianity, their own hatred is.

They're behaving like the Romans did, TAKE - TAKE - TAKE - KILL - TAKE...

Remember them? The ones who followed through on the orders to crucify your lord and savior?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

billnerie
Posted by: billnerie on Jun 9, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Roverton wrote:
"What kind of true Christian would allow a hateful monster like this to be unleashed upon their neighbors and children?"

A true Christian that's who given the hateful, genocidal, misogynistic, vengeful monster your god in the Bible is. They (the Religious Right) have the literal "truth" in their favor. They are the ones who are philosophically consistent.

For instance, which commandment reads..."Thou shalt not enslave thy fellow man"?? Seems like "Stuff A Deity Should Speak To" 101 to me. Go ahead quote the verses that might possibly be construed to maybe say slavery isn't nice. For each one there us 10 others telling us specifically when to beat them, with what, terms of enslavement, etc.

You want to know where the propensity for war and hegemony amongst the god-drunk, faith crazed Religious Right comes from? How about this bit of maniacal lunacy...
Rev:
19:11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
19:12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
19:14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
19:15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

You liberal "enlightened" Christians can tap dance around this and the multitude of other biblical sanctions for cruelty, divisiveness, barbarism, and war mongering, but you're as much to blame by considering, revering and giving credence to the contradictory, incoherent scribblings of bronze age, middle eastern goat-herders.

"The Reality Based Community", if I recall correctly, was a phrase coined by a spokesperson for our Puppet-in-Chief. I invite you to join it and stop being a part of the problem. Faith IS a dirty word.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]