Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Hail to the Stupid

Posted by Guest Blogger at 10:15 AM on June 7, 2007.


Brian Morton: Why do we lionize the stupid in American politics?
dueltvbushstupid775578

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Brian Morton, originally appeared on The Smirking Chimp

The magician and skeptic Penn Jillette once said, "You should wear your intellect like James Dean wore a leather jacket."

Now, Penn is no fan of Al Gore, but to view the way Gore is being treated upon publication of his New York Times No. 1 best seller The Assault on Reason is to wonder, What ever happened to a respect for knowledge in this country?

Dana Milbank, former White House correspondent and now Washington Sketch columnist for The Washington Post, used to be one of the Bush administration's most disliked reporters in the briefing room because of his incisive questioning and his ability to pierce through the double-talk, spin, and bullshit emitted from the podium there twice a day during the press gaggles. But now Milbank the opinion columnist is mocking Gore as "the smartest guy in the room" like some high-school jock sitting in the back of the English class who hides his SAT scores from his smarter buddies.

"Imagine the Iowa hog farmer cracking open Assault on Reason, and meeting Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Paine, John Kenneth Galbraith, Walter Lippmann, Johannes Gutenberg, John Stuart Mill, Thomas Jefferson and Marshall McLuhan--all before finishing the introduction," Milbank writes in his May 30 column. Whoa--I wouldn't want to be Milbank the next time he visits Cedar Rapids after demeaning the intelligence of some of the most politically astute citizens in the nation. Politicians often demean "coastal elites" and residents of Northeastern states (remember how they treated Vermonter Howard Dean as if he was some latte-sipping, Volvo-driving, New York Times crossword puzzle-in-ink effete liberal snob?), but a journalist firing a shot at Iowa hog farmers as if they haven't gone to college seems a hair dangerous to me.

But it all comes back to what we've subliminally been told we should want in our country's leaders for a few decades now. We are told that we want someone we should feel comfortable sitting down and having a beer with, someone who "is a regular guy." The jokers at Fox had a great time mocking John Kerry for his windsurfing after hailing George W. Bush prancing around the deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln in a flight suit after helping pilot his jet out to the boat. War-decorated Kerry, who rides motorcycles and pilots helicopters and (lest we forget) Swift boats, was treated as some sort of dork, while Bush, who got his ass handed to him in each of their three debates, gets a pass for not being able to string simple sentences together with a subject, verb, and object.

Apparently we should lionize the stupid.

Much of it stems from how our nation conducts debate: The simple beats the complex. In his 1923 essay "The Foundations of Quackery," self-admitted elitist H.L. Mencken posited that there exists a type of American who thinks that if he himself can't understand an advanced concept, than it must be hooey. "In medicine, for example, there was nothing beyond the comprehension of the average intelligent layman. But of late that has ceased to be true, to the great damage of the popular respect for knowledge," Mencken wrote.

But outside of the people who have "the scientific mind," Mencken said, "The average man, finding himself getting beyond his depth, instantly concludes that what lies beyond is simply nonsense."

Our nation faces skyrocketing debt, an oncoming health-care crisis, the rapidly advancing retirement of the baby boom and its attendant sociological challenges, the problems due to the lack of a coherent energy policy, and the extrication of hundreds of thousands of troops from Iraq, along with the threat of terrorism. Do we really want a president with the qualities you'd find in the guy at the end stool at Moe's bar to run the country?

Republicans, with their simple bromides about terrorism, constantly mock Democrats and liberals (contrary to what you might hear from Sean Hannity, they're not the same thing) for "not understanding terrorism." The leading GOP presidential candidates approach terrorism as if they were screenwriters for 24, to the point where one candidate's chest-thumping pledge to "double Guantanamo" has to be topped with "I'd hire Jack Bauer."

The problems we face require smarts, open-mindedness, and an appreciation of (and respect for) that thing the Bush administration scoffs at: nuance. But if history is to be our guide, let's recall that Everyman isn't big on eggheads running the show. Adlai Stevenson got dusted twice by Dwight Eisenhower back in the Soviet-fraught 1950s, despite a consensus that he far outpaced the also-smart but more staid military general in the thinking department.

After sarcastically deriding him as "professor" and sniffing that he "practically oozes gray matter," Milbank concludes his assault on Gore by quoting one of the audience members at Gore's speech at George Washington University, a Germantown resident named Alan Schwartz, who asks, "how do you convince people it's OK to feel inferior to their leaders?"

I would answer that by pointing out that the last six years are what happens when your leaders are mentally inferior to you.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, kerry, gore

Brian Morton is a columnist for the Baltimore City Paper.


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lionize the Stupid? Heck, the typical American
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jun 7, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IS stupid. Especially the ones still riding around with Bush/Cheney bumper stickers on their cars. There is no underestimating the general intelligence of the American public-especially in red states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» but you can... Posted by: brasilaron
Eggheads
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Jun 7, 2007 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't believe Milbank is still talking that way. Time to stop pandering to democracy's dark underside: suspicion of those whose expertise casts our own opinions in a dim light.

This is a democracy, damn it, and nobody is allowed to be more authoritative than anyone else.

Unfortunately, as journalist Christopher Shea writes, "Most people base their votes, and their answers to polls, on only the vaguest feelings about how the economy, or life, is treating them."

Our experiment with a guy on bar stool as president didn't work. Let's try a man at lectern this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clinton Posted by: oregoncharles
Mistake
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jun 7, 2007 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" while Bush, who got his ass handed to him in each of their three debates" -

I watched the debates, hoping for just this, and saw nothing of the sort. Kerry basically gave it a pass - this guy belongs to the "world's greatest debating society?" (the Senate.)

No wonder Kerry lost to the worst president in history. Personally, I don't think he had any intention of winning. It wasn't the Dems' turn yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mistake Posted by: brasilaron
Solutions
Posted by: Lauren on Jun 7, 2007 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Our nation faces skyrocketing debt, an oncoming health-care crisis, the rapidly advancing retirement of the baby boom and its attendant sociological challenges, the problems due to the lack of a coherent energy policy, and the extrication of hundreds of thousands of troops from Iraq, along with the threat of terrorism. Do we really want a president with the qualities you'd find in the guy at the end stool at Moe's bar to run the country?"

Issues- debt(economy), aging, healthcare, energy, mess in Iraq and terrorism. You forgot schools, drugs, pollution, environment, housing and corruption. OK, so Bush demonstrates how to do it bad, perhaps actually most bad. Worst ever even.

But saying, "I am not that" isn't really saying all that much. Politicians looking around thinking, "I don't want to go first with my ideas, they* will shoot them down" are not being very brave in this brave new world. They are not awake to the grim realities of the 1984 reality we are trapped in. They don't realize it is an ant-lions trap we are slipping into. They think this shifting sand is a little holiday at the beach.

*'They' being any of all kinds of people, more all the time, the internet is just a fantastic medium for complaining, and of course they're right.

So, what we have here is a situation where the selection process absolutely guarantees a) the big media selection of a follower who is afraid to speak, b) a 'flip-flopper' populist who follows the breeze most skillfully or c) a person who actually has a visionary plan for the future (will it work?).

Hmm... who could that be?

Unlike his father, Bush was real good at that whole 'vision thing', unfortunately his vision is one most people really don't want on the closer examination. His vision is hell. Heaven and hell are what we make of our lives, aren't they? So the real question to be asking god is, why does he tell GW Bush to bomb his children in the Gardens of Eden with phosphorus and depleted uranium?

The question to be asking ourselves is, what do I want my bit of heaven to look like? (When I look at the destruction in Iraq, all I can think of is the story of god tossing out Adam for eating from the tree of knowledge. I know the tree of knowledge is actually Cannabis, a field crop in Iraq. What was god thinking?)

MLK had a vision too, just because he is dead and dearly departed does not mean is vision has passed on. I have heard people say,"Oh, we tried that. It doesn't work." Let me tell you, it has NOT been tried. Not like it should be tried. You cant shovel money at problems and expect them to just get better. That is not the solution (it's the economy, stupid.) The solution is in the people, in the environment, in the goals, in the infrastructure. Business people understand this, but honestly, it is not their job to teach it.

The people who think the Democrats will win just because of some swinging pendulum effect need to get real. I mean, perhaps... or not. If you don't even recognize what the pendulum IS, what it is made of. How can you expect to predict it's swings? If you are pinning your hopes on that only, well, you could be sorely disappointed.

I was in Oakland (Oaksterdam) the other day (before the Rep. debate) and a young man was on his cell phone behind me, talking loudly about which conservatives he liked. (What! In Oakland, the ground zero of liberalism?!) When he plugged Huckabee... well I had to laugh.
After watching Joe's buffing, well, we'll see who has the last laugh.

Let's talk about something important, let's talk about education. (Just another way Ganja's devotees are discriminated against,BTW.) If we actually talked about finding a solution to the issue... the Democrats could loose.. a wedge issue. I have a solution. Should I say it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homer Simpson For President!
Posted by: lessbread on Jun 7, 2007 10:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(just kidding)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]