Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Problem With Porn

Posted by Guest Blogger at 6:01 AM on May 30, 2007.


Vanessa Valenti: Naomi Wolf's New York Magazine cover story on pornography makes the mistake of focusing predominately on the effect of porn on men.
b3
porn book

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Vanessa Valenti, originally appeared on Feministing

Naomi Wolf had the cover story in New York Magazine on Saturday titled, "The Porn Myth," which largely discussed how porn today basically kills people's sex lives; or in other words, men's.

With mainstream porn's fake breasts, tiny vaginas and perpetually tan bodies, the unrealistic expectations it puts on straight men and what sex is "supposed" to look like is evident, which Wolf points out. But her extreme oversimplification of the issue is evident as well.

She claims that all porn this day and age does is demolish straight women's sex lives because they can't live up to porn's image of the "perfect body" and satisfy their more-or-less bored partners. In fact, the entire piece discusses the issue from the perspective of men, seeming to say that a satisfying sex life is defined based on what a man wants.

Her solution seems to be to regress back to a more modest sexuality, and possibly mimic the sexual habits of more "traditional cultures":

I am not advocating a return to the days of hiding female sexuality, but I am noting that the power and charge of sex are maintained when there is some sacredness to it, when it is not on tap all the time.
Her example of this is her Orthodox Jewish friend who covers her body and hair in public, and the apparent erotic nature in the the fact that only her husband can see her hair. What exactly is she trying to posit by using this example? That we'd be better off covered up? She seems to be cloaking the idea of putting sex back into the private sphere with the concept of "sexual mystery." Wouldn't it be more practical (and fun) to simply promote the realistic images of women (and men) in sex culture than simply repress it altogether?

Continue reading "Promiscuities my ass."


White House Releases Turkey Pardon Spoof Then Does The Real Thing
Someone in the White House has a sense of humor.
Post by Daniel Kessler. November 25, 2009.
New Info Shows the Stimulus Is Working, Time for Conservatives to Thank Obama
There's no mystery here. The debate is over. The stimulus has made a real, positive difference.
Post by Steve Benen. November 25, 2009.
Say Goodbye to Common Sense: RedState Compares Health Care Reform to Attack on Pearl Harbor
It's beginning to seem that the right-wing media simply doesn't know what the word terrorism means.
Post by Brooke Obie. November 25, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?