Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democratic Congress being timid instead of tough

Posted by Guest Blogger at 6:58 AM on May 15, 2007.


Kathy Kattenburg: Congress is not being courageous by "allowing" the Senate to vote on the Feingold-Reid amendment, they're being cowardly.
reid
Reid

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This blog originally appeared on Shakesville:

Harry Reid has decided that he is going to permit the Senate to vote on the Feingold-Reid amendment. The Feingold-Reid amendment, if passed, would cut off all funding for the Iraq war after March 31, 2008. Greg Sargent calls this "a big deal for war opponents --

it's the first vote in the Senate on a measure of this kind. "This is a vote that folks have been clamoring for for some time now," enthuses a staffer who works for a Senator favoring the approach. […]
The staffer added that while the measure faces an uphill struggle, a vote on it will move the parameters of the debate and force Senators into a straight up-or-down vote on the war -- just as last week's House vote on Dem Rep. James McGovern's proposal to end the war did. The staffer claims that the Senate leadership was going back and forth all weekend on whether to allow this vote. "I think there are probably some people who would prefer not to see a vote on this," the staffer says. "It forces people to take a stand."
Here's the problem with that: If it took such a Herculean effort to "allow" the full Senate to vote on a bill that would fund the war for almost an entire additional year; and if committing to a vote on that bill is considered to be such an unimaginably enorrrrrmous act of courage -- when public opinion polls going back for at least a year consistently show large majorities of Americans oppose Bush's handling of the war, think the war was a mistake, think it has nothing to do with the war on terror, and want Congress to set a deadline for withdrawal -- then why is it party time when the Senate leadership finally is able to muster the fortitude, after months and months and months of dickering, to allow the Senate to vote on a bill that is exactly what the American people want? Why are we celebrating tentativeness when the American people want boldness? Why does Congress set such low standards for itself, and why do we let them?

Cross-posted at Liberty Street.

Digg!

Tagged as: congress, harry reid, russ feingold

Kathy Kattenburg is a freelance writer and editor working from northern New Jersey. She blogs at Liberty Street (her own blog), and at Shakesville.


Georgia Republican Saxby Chambliss Has No Idea What Roe v. Wade Actually Says
But that's not keeping him from making absurd claims about it.
Post by Jill Filipovic. December 21, 2009.
John McCain Trashes Obama for Failing to Foster "Bipartisanship"
McCain's attacks are the height of stupidity.
Post by Steve Benen. December 21, 2009.
Conservatives Continue Their Assault on Climate Science -- And Reason
Conservatives are claiming intense winter storms belie climate science. They are very wrong.
Post by Brad Johnson. December 21, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?