Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Christian Right's Ideology Seeps Into US Left ?

Posted by Bruce Wilson at 9:09 AM on May 6, 2007.


Bruce Wilson: Progressives Tout Bible Classes, Miss Fake History, In Public Schools

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Fake American history is now being taught in hundreds of American public high schools.

yawn... whatever...

Millions of Americans now believe that the true nature of the United States, and the intent of the founders of American government, has been subverted by "secularists" and "secularism", and the actual, central role secularism has played in the success of American Democracy seems on the verge of being forgotten, by America's politicians even...

zzzzzz......

Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation asserts right wing evangelical Christians are getting control of the US military. Weinstein was a lawyer in the Reagan Administration and is an Air Force Academy graduate.

OK, are you awake now ?

That's a troubling assertion, yup.

See, the Christian right doesn't have to be in the majority, or even close to it, to dominate America. Numbers are good, sure, but the long term strategy of Christian nationalism doesn't require numbers and instead relies on organization, discipline, and persistence.

How did the Christian right install dozens of its partisans in Congress, in the 1994 GOP takeover ? How did Oklahoma GOP Senator James Inhofe, who believes Global Warming is a hoax deployed by a vast shadowy conspiracy to create a "Satanic" "One World Order" through the United Nations, come to head the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and help block action on Global Warming for the better part of a decade ?

***

Political Attention Deficit Disorder ?

Why did so few on the left notice that the Bush Administration was packing the federal bureaucracy with partisan religious ideologues such as Monica Goodling ?

Cringefully few on the US left, even among those who prided themselves on having a high degree of political literacy, were hip to Bush's installation of Pat Robertson's Regent University cadres in the federal government ( not to mention graduates of Liberty University and Patrick Henry College, or Mormon partisans, or activists trained by Ron Luce... on and on ) and so perhaps it's silly for me to even get into the ways the Christian right exerts influence by promoting its ideology.

But, that effort is critical, and I'm going to try anyway because...

Christian nationalism is probably the driving ideology of the Christian right, and that ideology rests on fake history.

Fake History Now Taught In Hundreds Of US High Schools

The very notion that demonstrably fake history is being taught at ( at least, and the actual numbers of likely higher ) hundreds of American high schools seems noteworthy to me:

Totalitarian regimes rewrite history, for political reasons.

So, why aren't more people up in arms about this ? You got me.



Fake History, and the myth that the United States was founded originally as a "Christian Nation", is now being taught in hundreds of schools across America. Please click here to help Talk To Action Fight Fake History





Why is history so important ?

Enter Frederick Clarkson, from a recent Public Eye piece entitled History is Powerful - Why the Christian Right Distorts History and Why it Matters:

The notion that America was founded as a Christian nation is a central animating element of the ideology of the Christian Right. It touches every aspect of life and culture in this, one of the most successful and powerful political movements in American history. The idea that America's supposed Christian identity has somehow been wrongly taken, and must somehow be restored, permeates the psychology and vision of the entire movement. No understanding of the Christian Right is remotely adequate without this foundational concept.

But the Christian nationalist narrative has a fatal flaw: it is based on revisionist history that does not stand up under scrutiny. The bad news is that to true believers, it does not have to stand up to the facts of history to be a powerful and animating part of the once and future Christian nation. Indeed, through a growing cottage industry of Christian revisionist books and lectures now dominating the curricula of home schools and many private Christian academies, Christian nationalism becomes a central feature of the political identity of children growing up in the movement. The contest for control of the narrative of American history is well underway. (emphasis mine)

Example #1

About a week ago, hundreds of thousands of Turkish citizens demonstrated in support of secular Turkish government.

Over the course of the last year, Frederick Clarkson and I have been writing on the extent to which American national political and religious leaders no longer seem to really understand what the principle of secularism in government means, or how central secular government was to the success of American democracy.

Talk To Action even has an entire website topic category called "Demonizing Secularism", with approaching 50 posts on the subject (here's posts #31-#46 ) that demonstrate just how far the religious right's perverted, demonized definition of secularism has seeped into mainstream American political discourse.

Consider: massive rallies in Turkey, just staged in support of the principle of secular government. Meanwhile, many Americans, even the nation's leaders, no longer seem to understand what secularism means.

That may be improving, slowly. We'll see...

Example #2

The Bible In Public Schools: the Spread Of Christian Nationalist Ideology On The American Left.

A few weeks ago, I posted a popular, recommended diary on the Daily Kos which contained my critique about a Time Magazine cover story advocating for Bible classes in public schools.

Even though I didn't say in the post that I was categorically opposed to Bible classes in public schools, lots of people seemed to assume I was, and a counter-diary, which hit the recommended list popped up to argue for Bible classes in schools. I was surprised the issue was so contentious on this forum.

Based on numbers of recommenders, about 1/2 of Daily Kos members thought Bible classes in public schools were a good thing and that I was being unfair to Time Magazine and to Time's senior religion correspondent, Dave Van Biema.

So, the following week, I did another recommended diary entitled "Christian Nationalism Has You By The ____ and You Don't Even Know It".

In that post, I wrote:

the troubling aspect of the controversy, for me, concerned the apparent ability of Time's cover story to short circuit the basic logical skepticism, or so it seemed, of many members from one of the leading US left/progressive community websites on the Internet. The illogic of Time's cover story should have provoked skepticism at least and the fact that the story got a substantial amount of support in the progressive/liberal political activist community is exhibit "A" in my case that Christian nationalist precepts are starting to get their hooks into the heads of people on the American left

Time's op-ed in favor of Bible classes in public schools employed a favorite argument of Christian nationalism ; majority religious preferences rule and if religious minorities don't like the promotion of partisan religious values in schools or elsewhere in the public sphere, tough. Time's article expresses this plainly ; 60% of Americans favor Bible classes in public schools. But I can assure you this ; people in the Indian River School District of Southern Delaware who, in 2005 or 2006, harassed a Jewish family from its home of 18 years, to flee the area amidst death threats, did not think they were being unreasonable but, rather, that the family which fled was out of line for complaining about Christian sectarian displays of religious beliefs in public schools. Christian nationalism works best when it is implicit, part of our background mental assumptions.

One of the hallmarks of good PR and propaganda is that it becomes unnoticeable as ideas sink into our mental landscape to shape our perceptions and even come to seem commonsensical.

That sure was a controversial post even though I said upfront that Christian nationalist ideas had seeped into my head too.

Later, I found proof that was really the case, because I came across this fine critique of Time's article, by Tim Mitchell, which my writing had apparently inspired, that made points about Time's/Van Biema's argument that hadn't occurred to me and which seemed painfully obvious in retrospect. Tim Mitchell's analysis hammered home the point, to me ; Christian nationalist ideology has spread a lot farther than most, me included, realize.

Here's a sample of the arguments Mitchell makes:

As Van Biema himself asserts, America is an overwhelmingly Christian country, with churches outnumbering schools and government buildings in community after community. Ergo, there are plenty of places where the Bible could be taught and the Ten Commandments and nativity creches could be displayed with nary a legal challenge. According to the 2006 article that appeared in The New Yorker, The Good Book Business, the Bible itself has spawned an extremely lucrative niche publishing industry. Not only is the Bible is the best selling book of the year, every year, but that the amount spent annually on Bibles has been estimated at more than a half a billion dollars. Studies have shown that 91 percent of Americans own at least one Bible, and that the average household owns four....

[ Mitchell proceeds to list the seemingly endless roster of specialized Bibles, Bible magazines, audio Bibles.... ]

In light of such over-representation, the argument that public schools should be teaching the Bible in an environment where institutions openly devoted to the Christian faith are in abundance and where the Bible is a consistent bestselling book available in multiple demographic-specific editions is completely ridiculous. Moreover, churches are already tax-exempt; to burden taxpayer funded, secular institutions such as public schools with teaching about the Bible (something that churches already do) will only take time and money away from other subjects that schools should be providing (something that churches don't do). Perhaps the best way this could be handled is to remove the tax-exempt status of churches in communities where Bible classes are taught in public schools, since its clear that the public schools are being used to provide a service that churches are not and therefore they should not be allowed to use their failure as a tax shelter. But I digress

The real problem with teaching the Bible in public schools is that by only emphasizing the holy writings of one religion and no other, the school gives the student the impression that Christianity is the ONLY religion worthy of recognition and adherence. Even if the Bible classes are offered only as an elective choice in public schools, the fact that students would have no other religious text to choose from as a subject of study will nevertheless impact how the students view the world around them.

In the end, the controversy over Bible classes in public schools suggests to me that the notion of America as a "Christian nation" has begun to seep in to the minds of people across the US political spectrum, mine included, and that it is seeping, in diffuse form, into the minds of people on the US left.

Digg!

Tagged as: bible

Bruce Wilson writes for Talk To Action, a blog specializing in faith and politics.


Laura Flanders: Vanity Fair's Retort to the New Yorker's Obama Cover Misses the Mark
If Vanity Fair wanted to flip the New Yorker cover on the GOP, they'd have to portray the media's lies about the candidate. Not the true stuff.
Post by Laura Flanders. July 24, 2008.
Air Force Brass Get "Comfort Capsules" on Taxpayer's Dime
A new report finds the Air Force is spending counterterrorism funds on luxury in-flight seating for military and civilian leaders.
Post by Liliana Segura. July 24, 2008.
The Power of Panties For Peace
"Some might say, 'it can't happen here,' but I'm here to warn you that it can. A fifth column of pantie warriors has arisen in the netroots."
Post by General JC Christian. July 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hmm
Posted by: particle on May 6, 2007 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...So, why aren't more people up in arms about this ? You got me..."

Um, why would any people saturated with story-telling, advertising, post-modernism, new-aging, faith-basing, infotainment, story-telling, alcohol, special effects, Rush Limbaugh clones, pill-popping, "self-esteem" and pandering of all kinds, Carlos Casteneda type academic hoaxes, soaps, day-time talk shows, cross channel TV ministries, fanzines, intellectual hating, science bashing...

anyway why would saturated people shrug off something to do with religion? Beats the Hell out of me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmm Posted by: cfuz7
Well, for one thing....
Posted by: Bruce Wilson on May 6, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US left has been ridiculing the religious right for years.

Meanwhile, the religious right has worked to obtain substantial political power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, for one thing.... Posted by: particle
"Christian Syrup"
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on May 6, 2007 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Blech!"

This kind of syrupy goo has been gradually seeping into everything else, so is it any wonder its now gumming up the military machine?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Treaty With Tripoli
Posted by: jmooney on May 6, 2007 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Artiicle 11, Treaty With Tripoli, passed 1797
Constitution operative 1788.

9 years after Constitution operative, this was passed.

Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Treaty With Tripoli Posted by: Bruce Wilson
You only have to look to Jefferson
Posted by: truthteller on May 6, 2007 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Jefferson wanted to be remembered for three things on his tombstone (and President was not one of them). Second only to his authorship of the Declaration of Independence was his authorship of the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom, just above being the Father of the University of Virginia.

I know this, because I was at Montecello last week and made it a point to go to his grave and photograph it so I could show this proof to any thick-headed religious know-nothing who might insist otherwise.

I also wanted to see if I could hear the whiring sound of old Tom spinning in his grave over what has been done to the Republic he and his peers so carefully crafted and left to us. I hang my head in shame!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

breakthesky
Posted by: breakthesky on May 6, 2007 5:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It honestly is beyond me what all the fuss on the right is about. I attend church with my kids twice a week, teach Sunday school for adults and a youth ministry class. I believe my kids get ENOUGH religion. I don't want some teacher in a public school giving their take on what God means or wants from us. I emphasize love and charity and being non-judgemental with my kids. I teach them to respect other people's religion while being comfortable with their own. I don't want some of the hateful viewpoints I see from other holy rollers getting into my kids.

I rather believe MOST people of faith would be unhappy with what a public education would teach about religion. The reason there are so many churches in this country is there is a wealth of diversity of opinion within the Christian church.

Another thing I don't understand. All these people in the country say they are Christian and/or believe in God. Only a fairly small percentage of those people actually attend church though. If they can't be bothered to attend church, why should they want to have it taught in school?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It seems Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
So, what do you do in politics in the absence of a viable political program, since...
Posted by: Sojourner on May 6, 2007 10:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...you have only contempt for government?

You turn it into what you believe in--Christian theocracy.

Elementary, my dear Dr. Watson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Talk To Action
Posted by: thirdmg on May 7, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been alarmed for decades by the growing power of the religious right and have done what little I could to send up warnings or to oppose it. During much of that time, it was dismissed by most of the media as an out-of-touch fringe movement which was already on its deathbed. But now, like a massive cultural toxic spill, it's increasingly permeating and polluting mainstream thinking.

I hope that the above article by Bruce Wilson, as well as the many other articles posted at his Talk To Action site, will lead to more political and religious activists becoming alert and inventive in finding ways to oppose the religious right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Talk To Action Posted by: mommy64
Teach the Bible in schools
Posted by: Lilah on May 7, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do it in an objective, rational way, and it will absolutely DESTROY the notion of the Bible as an innerrant document, one of the foundations of fundamentalism.

So while I am a secular humanist and a liberal, I support the teaching of the Bible in the publc schools, so long as it is done in a non-promotional, non-devotional way, which is the only way it would be Constitutional anyway.

The Victorian era, the church, in addition to the blow to religion dealt by Darwins On the Origen of Species, also had to deal with scholarly techniques of literature and history being applied to the Bible as they never had before.

Teach the Bible. Teach why religious scholars believe there are at least four distinct authors of the Pentatuch. Teach how linguistic clues lead to dates for the gospels that mean they could not possibly be written by people with a first hand perspective of the events. Teach how to look at the Bible objectively, and fundamentalist will howl for it's removal from the cirriculum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHRISTIAN PRESIDENT
Posted by: fg on May 7, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's imperative that the next president of the US NOT be Christian. Look at what the last Christian president has done . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Religion seeps into brains like a viral disease everywhere
Posted by: reval on May 7, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mankind will not be free to fully evolve until the last stone from the last church falls on the empty skull of the last religionist.

Rev. El
Pastor, WVCSR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Commie = non-believer
Posted by: eddie torres on May 7, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dr Strangelove, 1964. Even a failsafe system that's 99.99% secure will break down within 30 years.

General Jack D. Ripper (Sterling Hayden), after unilaterally ordering his bomb wing to launch a pre-emptive attack on the USSR: "I'm putting the base on condition Red... It looks like we're in a shooting war!"

General Jack D. Ripper, advising his troops on how to spot the enemy: "A commie will try any trick to breach the security on this base. He may come in the uniform of our own troops... Trust no one, whatever his rank, who is not known to you personally."

General Buck Turgidson (George C Scott): "My recommendation is that we follow General Ripper's action to its logical end. In other words, hit the other fellow as hard as we can!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JESUS WASN'T RELIGIOUS!
Posted by: Roverton on May 7, 2007 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's why he was killed, for not playing the corporate game.

Religion and spirituality are not identical. He wanted spirits to be free, and not following bullying dogma from any large structure of other fellow people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christian Right Influencing High School History Classes
Posted by: SharC on May 7, 2007 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately this is not new. I recently retired after teaching U.S. history for over 36 years. In 1989 I wrote a thesis for my second master's degree entitled: The Politics of Censorship Litigation: The New Right and the Classroom. I had become appalled and frankly horrified by their use of the court to influence classroom content. This was why I chose to research the above titled thesis. It was in doing the investigation by intensive reading of far right tracts that I found a number of the New (Christian) Right were aware that the court approach probably would not work. Soon they were advocating a more low key, subtle take over of the public school system. To do this they advocated getting their supporters elected to local boards of education, town councils, state and federal legislatures. In this way they could gradually change curriculum and instruction methodologies. Trust me, I could quote chapter and verse on how this was to be done if I had the time and space afforded me in this post.

Whenever I would be challenged on the content of my lectures and assignments, I invited them to first read the materials themselves and then I would gladly debate their criticisms. No one accepted my challenge because as I discovered, most chose NOT to read the materials to which they objected. Instead they read from a prepared script provided by any number of these Christian right groups.

Until the day I retired, I strived mightily to inform my fellow instructors of the insidiousness of these individuals and groups. As the local chair of my union's political action arm, I always interviewed perspective candidates and challenged them on their hidden agendas. Most were surprised that I was even aware of their true motivations.

Therefore I concur with Mr. Wilson's article, but again I repeat this is NOT new. It is something that I hope most history teachers will not permit to happen in their classrooms. We need to continue to fight against such dogmatism. Teaching the Bible as literature within an historical perspective could be OK, but it requires a very clever, well read instructor to carry it off. Unfortunately far too many U.S. history teachers are often coaches first and teachers second.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]