Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Male Slate writer has rules for women

Posted by Guest Blogger at 8:16 AM on May 1, 2007.


William Saletan feels comfortable lecturing women on their own rights.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

The Fraud Of Fraud
Digby Hullabaloo

Broken Glass
DCap DistributorCap

Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
Emptywheel Firedoglake

by Zuzu from Feministe:

I really wonder sometimes if Will Saletan is my father’s long-lost bastard child. Because he’s got the exact same talent Dad had for telling you what you already knew in a manner that made it clear that he thought he was a genius and you were benighted and in dire need of his instruction. Even where he is hopelessly, utterly wrong — or at the very least, just not getting it in the name of being “contrarian.”

I have noted this similarity once before, comparing Will’s stunning revelation that greater access to contraception will tend to decrease abortion (not to mention his belief that he just thought of this all by himself) to my father’s being full of advice about the use of the microwave that everyone else in the house had already been using for 10 years before he deigned to figure out how to turn it on.

Will’s latest offering from the “No shit, Sherlock” files reminds me very much of my father’s solemnly informing me that there are nine Justices on the Supreme Court. Mind you, I was in college at the time. Poli Sci. I kinda knew that. But Dad was a white guy, and that made him an Expert.

What’s the latest pearl of wisdom from Lord Saletan? Women just don’t know that they’re aborting fetuses, and we have to make sure they know this!

In its April 18 ruling, the court treated abortion like an obscenity—something that could be done, but not out in the open. Partial-birth abortions, the court reasoned, could be banned because they occur outside the woman’s body. Other abortions need not be outlawed, since the womb conceals them.

Ultrasound dissolves this distinction. It offers to make every fetus and every abortion visible. It forces the court to renounce either the partial-birth ban or the right to abortion.

Oh, my god! Who knew that these were human fetuses that were getting aborted??? Sweet gibbering Jesus, were it not for ultrasound technology, we would never, ever know what goes on within the black box of a woman’s body!

It’s hard to accept if you see abortion as a woman’s right. But it’s even harder to accept if you see abortion as the taking of a human life. That’s one reason why pro-lifers are turning their attention from partial-birth abortion to ultrasound, from the fetus outside the body to the fetus within. They’re trying to open, in their words, a “window to the womb.”

Pro-lifers are often caricatured as stupid creationists who just want to put women back in their place. Science and free inquiry are supposed to help them get over their “love affair with the fetus.” But science hasn’t cooperated. Ultrasound has exposed the life in the womb to those of us who didn’t want to see what abortion kills. The fetus is squirming, and so are we.

Around the country, ultrasound bills are all the rage. Most of them require clinics to offer each woman an ultrasound view of her fetus. Mississippi enacted a law on March 22. Idaho followed April 3. Georgia’s legislature passed a bill a week ago; South Carolina’s is about to do the same.

Quick! Better lobby your state legislature for an ultrasound bill! All the cool kids are doing it. It’s all techno.

Plus, you don’t want to be a pussy, do you?

Critics complain that these bills seek to “bias,” “coerce,” and “guilt-trip” women. Come on. Women aren’t too weak to face the truth. If you don’t want to look at the video, you don’t have to. But you should look at it, and so should the guy who got you pregnant, because the decision you’re about to make is as grave as it gets.

Are ultrasound pushers trying to bias your decision? Of course. But of all the things they do to “inform” your decision, this is the least twisted. Look at the Senate’s “Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act.” It would order your doctor to deliver a 193-word script full of bogus congressional findings about your “pain-capable unborn child.” Ultrasound cuts through that kind of garbage. The image on the monitor may look like a blob, a baby, or neither. It certainly won’t follow some senator’s script. All it will show you is the truth.

Look at the pretty pictures!

You know, that little line about “the truth” reminds me of that scene in A Few Good Men where Tom Cruise has Jack Nicholson on the stand: “I want the truth!” demands Tom. “You can’t handle the truth,” sneers Jack.

Now, why would I think of a Tom Cruise movie when reading an article about ultrasounds?

I just love how Saletan decides that women don’t know “the truth” about abortion, and that ultrasounds are just the ticket for telling them that they have a human life in their wombs. That fetuses MOVE!

Uh, they know that already, Will. That’s why they’re getting abortions. Because they know that if the embryo or fetus is left there, chances are it will be a baby after nine months, the responsibility of someone who doesn’t want to have a baby. They don’t need to look at an ultrasound to know that. Of course, anti-choicers remain convinced otherwise:

To pro-lifers, ultrasound is a test of pro-choice sincerity. “The same people who scream that women must always be told ‘all their options,’ including abortion, balk at allowing women to see whom it is whose life they are about to take,” says Mary Spaulding Balch, NRLC’s state legislative director. “They are petrified that women will change their minds after seeing their babies.”

So, uh, you gonna pay for this, Mary? Because requiring ultrasounds — which are not cheap — is going to raise the price of abortions and force even more late-term procedures as women have to get the money together. Which, of course, is the point here: throw up as many roadblocks as possible, raise the costs, make it as difficult as possible to obtain an abortion, and maybe a few of those sluts will change their minds. And if they don’t want to look at the video, they’re weak and can’t handle the truth.

Actually, given how many obstacles are put into womens’ paths, particularly in Bible-belt states, it’s a wonder anyone goes through with abortion at all. I’ve never had one, but if I ever needed one, I live in a state with incredibly liberal abortion laws. I can’t even imagine scraping together the money, traveling to a distant clinic, going through mandatory waiting periods, having to sit through bullshit disclosures about the procedure, running the gantlet of the protesters outside (not to mention all the security inside due to the terrorism directed at women’s clinics), and then having one more goddamn thing thrown at you: “Look! It’s your baby!”

That so many women do make it through this whole procedure is a real testament to the fact that they know the truth already and they will do what they need to do. Which is something that needs to be added to the list of things Saletan Just Doesn’t Get. Because this is how he closes his piece:

To trust the ultrasound, you have to trust the woman.

If you trusted the woman in the first place, you wouldn’t force her to view an ultrasound.

Digg!

Tagged as: slate, ultrasound, saletan


The Fraud Of Fraud
The process of turning ACORN into a terrorist sleeper cell has begun and I see little hope that they aren't going to be successful.
Post by Digby. October 11, 2008.
Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And..
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on May 1, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. how many times have we heard about what men are and are not, can and cannot do and how we think.... from women???????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And.. Posted by: oregoncharles
» Maybe "Yes", Maybe "No"... Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: And.. Posted by: drmflorida
Red Brown and Blue Party comment
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on May 1, 2007 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ultrasound is a revelation. The farther up the scale of complexity, the more difficult it is to deny feelings of grief. Mother Nature usually aborts in the early stages, presumably for good reason. Life and choice are so divided because the issue is not clear. Take a clue from Nature. She has more experience than science techs. Both are needed: Nature and Art (scientific). Clarity comes from integration of partial truths.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

luzmejor
Posted by: luzmejor on May 1, 2007 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't the ultrasounds that women don't trust.
It's the goons at fake clinics, who are trying to pretend they are physicians or people of faith, that we don't trust.

Nobody should make the mistake that pro-lifers believe their own rhetoric about birth or abortion. It is always a script designed to control and contain the poor, frightened and ignorant young girls in our society and everywhere else in the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Constitutional Amendment to Ban Consensual Crime Laws
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on May 1, 2007 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abortion, like prostitution and drug use, is ultimately an issue of individual liberty and personal freedom.

My body, my choice.

Until enough of our society recognizes the importance of individual liberty and the right to self determination and passes a constitutional amendment banning consensual crime laws (and defining life as beginning after birth), we will always have those who would impose their personal moral beliefs on others seeking to do so with the weight of law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Choice
Posted by: Schroeder on May 1, 2007 5:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women do know that other women do not choose abortion lightly. Have you ever heard anyone say: "I favor abortion"??!!? Choosing abortion must be a horribly difficult choice. To those who say they do not believe women should have abortions, I say: "Don't have one". I long for a society that moves closer to one which makes the decision to abort unnecessary. Until then, only the woman making the decision should be able to make the decision.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look to the rest of humanity
Posted by: zorro on May 2, 2007 6:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is this only an issue in America and China? Both countries seem to be morally mad. One through faith in God, the other faith in fuedal tradition--both with faith in hypocrisy. This is not even an issue in many countries. It is not an issue in Europe. Europe is governed, mostly, by reason. America is governed by ignorance and Puritan-midevil-fundamentalist-evangelical witch-burning cavemen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]