Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

GOP lies attempt to slime Reid -- and most Americans in the process

Posted by Bob Geiger at 9:55 AM on April 24, 2007.


Bob Geiger: Republicans imply that most of us don't support troops.
gopslimeattack

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

When I met Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in December and had a chance to conduct a lengthy interview, I came away with the impression that, while I might not agree with his approach to every policy issue, he is a genuinely tough guy who, far more often than not, will continue speaking hard truth to the Republican party and the White House. I believe Reid has fulfilled that estimate in his first few months as majority leader, no matter how much he understands that the GOP slime machine will distort every word he says -- and even some that he never said -- to bolster their failed agenda.

The latest example began almost immediately after Reid said on the Senate floor that, under the watch of George W. Bush, the Iraq war "is lost." Actually, here's exactly what Reid said on April 19:

"Conditions in Iraq get worse by the day. Now we find ourselves policing another nation's civil war. We are less secure from the many threats to our national security than we were when the war began. As long as we follow the President's path in Iraq, the war is lost.

"But there is still a chance to change course and we must change course. No one wants us to succeed in the Middle East more than I do. But there must be a change of course. Our brave men and women overseas have passed every test with flying colors. They have earned our pride and our praise. More important, they deserve a strategy worthy of their sacrifice."
So that's what Reid really said. But what are the Republicans telling people?

John Cornyn (R-TX) one of the most onerous of the GOP liars, jumped right at Reid after his statement with this:

“It is now abundantly clear why the Democrat leadership in Congress has been holding hostage the critical funding that our troops need for body armor and weaponry – they simply do not believe our military can win, and they are no longer willing to stand behind them. I think that is both wrong and irresponsible. The Senate Democrat Leader is certainly entitled to his opinion, but his public lack of confidence in our troops is an insult to their deep sacrifice and a sign of encouragement to our terrorist enemies."
That's a real Republican two-for-one deal: Cornyn tells people that Reid was being critical of the troops and not Bush and throws in the routine bit about Democrats supporting the terrorists.

Given that the previous, rubber-stamp Republican Congress has their hands stained with the same blood as Bush and Cheney's, and being wholly incapable of accepting blame and showing honesty and integrity, I guess they really have no choice in their limited, filthy playbook, but to make it sound like Reid was criticizing the troops.

It doesn’t matter that the record shows the Democratic Leader was slamming the White House and the Republican party and not the military itself. Nor does it make any difference to them that every statement made on the war by Congressional Democrats has included phrases about the troops like "done everything we've asked of them" and "performed bravely and honorably," as the GOP smear machine still cranks out its version of reality.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) dipped into his mud bucket and tried to make it sound like Reid's desire to get the troops out of the middle of a civil war -- one that has nothing to do with our country -- must be devastating to their moral.

“I can’t begin to imagine how our troops in the field, who are risking their lives every day, are going to react when they get back to base and hear that the Democrat Leader of the United States Senate has declared the war is lost," whined McConnell. "I can’t begin to imagine what their families will think."

And no matter how much he knows that Republicans cling to his every word hoping they can find anything to spin as him being the Iraq war version of Tokyo Rose, Reid has had it up to his eyeballs with Bush's Iraq quagmire, the death it is bringing to American families and the extent to which it has made our country demonstrably less safe.

Reid also knows that he is speaking for the vast majority of the American people when he persists in telling the truth about the status of our involvement in Iraq's civil war.

Whether it is in the lies that took America there to begin with or the utter incompetence with which the Bush administration has performed every, single facet of this foreign policy disaster, the Iraq war is indeed lost -- and come election day in 2008, the American people will show how right Reid was in saying it.

When it became clear to all thinking Americans that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and that their WMD claims were an utter fabrication, Team Bush made their story du jour that they were doing all of this to build a stable democracy in the Middle East.

Yeah, that's the ticket. And they've failed to have that come true as well.

And take a look at this lovely ad just released by the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) in which they deliberately take Reid's words out of context and use them to smear Democratic Senators running for reelection in 2008:

And take a look at this lovely ad just released by the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) in which they deliberately take Reid's words out of context and use them to smear Democratic Senators running for reelection in 2008.

That one targeted Tom Harkin (D-IA) but identical ads have been produced hitting Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and others going before voters again next year. In a show of how desperate the NRSC is for material, they actually cite propagandist Michelle Malkin's blog as the source of most of their "evidence" of Democrats tanking morale among the troops.

None of this should come as any surprise to the American people. This is the same Republican party that swiftboated John Kerry and who viciously smeared Max Cleland, who had three limbs blown off in Vietnam, by placing him next to Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein in television ads for the 2002 Georgia Senate election.

They heaped filth on one of their own in going after John McCain's family in 2000 and in 1988 attacked Kitty Dukakis, when the Willie Horton ads weren't damaging enough to her husband, Democratic presidential nominee, Michael Dukakis.

This is what they do. But their attacks on Reid and his truthful statement about the status of the Iraq war will come back to haunt them.

The majority of Americans are beyond agreeing with Reid that the war is "lost" as of April of 2007, with most thinking that we never should have gone to Iraq to begin with. This confirms the prevailing public opinion that the war was never ours to win. Two-thirds of the American people agree with Harry Reid and don't like their loyalty and patriotism being slimed any more than does Reid or other Democrats.

The people who are truly lost are the 33 percent or so who watch Fox News, approve of the job being done by the worst president in U.S. history and cling with fear to the notion that the Chickenhawk-in-Chief has done anything to make them more safe.

Most Americans know the truth as spoken by Senator Reid and, if the scumbags in the Republican party don’t know it now, they'll damn sure find out on November 4, 2008.

Digg!

Tagged as: republican, propaganda, harry reid

Bob Geiger is a political writer, specializing in coverage of the United States Senate for AlterNet and other Progressive web sites. You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at BobGeiger.com.


Hallmark Gets Down with Same-Sex Marriage
Now same-sex couples can receive incredibly earnest cards at their weddings too.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. August 21, 2008.
McCain Office Is Sent White Powder, Threat
CBS: McCain's campaign office in Denver, CO has received a letter containing a threat and "an amount of white powder in it"
Post by AlterNet Staff. August 21, 2008.
Iran: NBA Succeeds Where Bush Administration Failed
You can assume that NBA teams won't be calling in Condoleezza Rice to help with negotiations.
Post by Faiz Shakir. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How refreshing
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Apr 24, 2007 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and encouraging it is to hear an American politician stand up and tell the truth bravely and bluntly, and especially for it to be a Democrat. Speaker Pelosi, Senator Reid, and some of their colleagues give me rising hope for this country. It's a shame that Cornyn and his ilk continue to drag down the level of discourse, but I certainly hope the American people will be able to tell truth from fiction, and--more important--that progressives continue to be proactive rather than reactive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How can you spin it. Posted by: kbest
Cornyn lied? Say it ain't so!
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Apr 24, 2007 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm shocked - deeply shocked! Twisting, quoting out of context - oh my!

Question: has Cornyn ever told the truth about anything?

Here's the good news about Cornyn. He's up for reelection in 08. I think we're gonna get him this time. Let him just keep it up - nobody takes him seriously anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support oour troops?
Posted by: opeluboy on Apr 24, 2007 4:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, I don't. Sorry, no matter how nice it sounds to constantly intone such nonsense, I cannot do it.

First, the thought occurs to me that there are around 600,000 dead Iraqis, most of which were not suicides but slaughtered by these same troops Mr Geiger and other useful idiots praise, while pretending to be antiwar (or at least against this one).

Secondly, it has always been a rule of mine that if I were to kill someone, I would need a reason. Old-fashioned, I know, but to simply blow women, children and men into bits of bone, flesh and red mist because someone told me to would go against my beliefs. That we have troops in Iraq, and elsewhere, that can do this without even a twinge of conscience makes it impossible for me to offer my support, other than working for their immediate removal from Iraq. And this, I must admit, would be less for their own safety than to prevent them from causing more needless death and destruction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well Said... Posted by: Aimleft
Couldn't bear to watch the NRSC ads
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 24, 2007 10:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I confess that I have hooked my tv up again to the old networks. After a seven year lay off, maybe this time I can avoid becoming a couch potato. But the tv ads were one reason I cold-turkeyed out.

To be honest, the Demos have a pretty slimy record in electioneering, too. As with war, of course, it's the other guy's fault. If it were my responsibility to win an election and since the GOP treat politics like war (they need to, since they have zero to offer), I'd not give any ground either. It's really too bad that our electorate is so lazy that sound bites make a difference and lies told sincerely are believable.

Reading Reid's statement and the statements by his critics makes clear what the cool medium of tv does not--the critics are non sequiturs; their remarks are obviously distortions. I doubt that is as easy to distinguish by listening as by reading.

Isn't that why we need responsible reporters? We readers and writers need to hang together--or we'll hang alone? to coin a phrase.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: nature wants WAR
Posted by: otto on Apr 25, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All you say should certainly be true; democrats should be able to run Denny Dimwit and Alfred E. Neuman in 2008 and still win....but then, George Bush won in 1992 even after 8 disastrous years of Ronald Reagan...and Republicans still control the voting machines in strategic parts of the coiuntry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did I support the troops then?
Posted by: Alladin on Apr 25, 2007 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a friend who served in WWII who told me of shooting Japenese POWs. Did I support that? Did I support what happened at Mi Lai? At Waco? At Abu Ghriab? What happened and is continuing to happen at Guantanamo? Is it all or nothing when we talk about supporting the troops?

I was one of the troops once and enjoyed the "support" I got but didn't expect blind allegiance no matter what I did. I didn't expect to hide behind the shield of patriotism to excuse any act that I or my comrades committed.

No, I don't support my country right or wrong. Just when it's in the right. No, I don't support the troops, right or wrong. Same reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But what about the OIL
Posted by: james2021 on Apr 25, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since that is the reason we're there. Repugwicans will not let go of that resource. So we will stay in IRAQ/IRAN as long as the OIL holds out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Red Brown and Blue Party comment
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Apr 25, 2007 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I support the troops if they're right, fighting a just war. In Iraq, they're dead wrong and should get out. Supporting troops or country right or wrong is fascist propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Nazi GOP will reap EXACTLY what it sows
Posted by: xbj on Apr 25, 2007 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just exactly the same way Nazi Amerika will reap what it has sown in the Middle East.

What goes around comes around.... even for elite Nazi bastard screwups who believe the best way to make money in the world is to invest in the industry of creating an enemy by the killing of innocents and then continuing the death and destruction until there's nothing left in the Treasury to appropriate.

Or until foreign countries pull the plug on the credit and call in the loans.

Whichever comes first, Nazi Amerika is toast. Maybe even black glass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Apr 25, 2007 8:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In what way is writing about the D and the R opinions on this war- ALTERNATIVE?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]