Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Which came first, the chicken or the cancer?

Posted by Guest Blogger at 8:16 AM on April 24, 2007.


Kathy Freston: 70 percent of chickens in the US are fed arsenic.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Once you start paying attention, you just can't avoid the bad news about meat consumption. From Reuters comes the news that "Women who received the most calories from animal protein had twice the risk of [endometrial cancer] compared to those who took in the fewest calories from animal sources."

And then I read this morning in Chemical & Engineering News (O.K., so I don't subscribe; a friend forwarded it to me) some truly scary news about eating chickens: About 70 percent of chickens in the U.S. are fed arsenic (to promote growth, stave off disease, etc.), a practice banned in the EU; that's right--arsenic!?

As in, poison. As in that wonderful play, "Arsenic and Old Lace," about the clever old gals who use it to kill their gentlemen callers!

Arsenic & Young Chickens


In fact, according to the piece, the average U.S. chicken has about 390 parts per billion of arsenic, "which is three to four times greater than arsenic levels in other types of poultry and meat from other animals."

I need to just quote from the story directly about the possible impact of this:

"According to the Environmental Protection Agency, long-term exposure to inorganic arsenic can cause bladder, lung, skin, kidney, and colon cancer, as well as deleterious immunological, neurological, and endocrine effects. Low-level exposures can lead to partial paralysis and diabetes...

"Even though the drinking water standard for arsenic has been strengthened, the standards for arsenic residues in poultry-2,000 ppb for liver and 500 ppb for muscle-have remained unchanged for decades. Furthermore, neither the Food & Drug Administration nor the Department of Agriculture has actually measured the level of arsenic in the poultry meat that most people consume..."

But actually, it's not just the poison that's being fed to chickens and concentrating in their flesh that is causing meat-eaters to get sick. No, apparently the real problem with chicken and other meats isn't some scary additive--it's actually the animal protein itself, which both causes and fuels cancer cells, and which will exist in chicken meat even if the U.S. poultry industry stops feeding animals arsenic (though it sure sounds like the chicken industry has no interest in stopping; they feed 2.2. million pounds of arsenic to chickens right now).

The "China Project"


Indeed, I think that the most compelling evidence against eating animal products comes from China, and shows that the carcinogenic nutrient in meat is protein, rather than fat. In one of my favorite books on the subject of health, The China Study: Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss and Long-Term Health, author T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D., a Professor Emeritus of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University, explains that animal protein is the most carcinogenic substance we consume ( even worse than the arsenic in chicken) and presents powerful data showing that animal products both cause and fuel cancer and other deadly diseases.

Dr. Campbell's study is the most comprehensive survey of the connection between diet and disease in medical history, and he has looked at all of the clinical, epidemiological, and other evidence, and it all backs up what he documented in China. His final statement on what we should all be eating?

Here's how he explains it in "Why China Holds the Key to Your Health": "The data from the China Project suggest that what we have come to consider as 'normal' illnesses of aging are really not normal. In fact, these findings indicate that the vast majority perhaps 80 to 90% of all cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and other forms of degenerative illness can be prevented, at least until very old age, simply by adopting a plant-based diet."

These are strong words from a man who was raised on a dairy farm, got his Ph.D. in animal nutrition, and worked on a project to produce animal protein more efficiently.

The Deadly Connection Between Animal Protein, Blood Cholesterol, and Carcinogens:


Dr. Campbell now believes it best to avoid animal protein altogether. According to Campbell, blood cholesterol levels can be reduced by eating plant protein instead. "Some of the plant proteins, particularly soy," he says, "have an impressive ability to reduce blood cholesterol." This might explain a finding released a few months back that "eating tofu can slash ovarian cancer risk."

"At the outset of the China Study," writes Dr. Campbell in his book, "no one could or would have ever predicted the relationship between cholesterol and any of the disease rates. What a surprise we got." Dr. Campbell and his team found that as blood cholesterol levels decrease, a slew of cancers decreases as well, including "cancers of the liver, rectum, colon, male lung, female lung, breast, childhood leukemia, adult leukemia, childhood brain, adult brain, stomach and esophagus (throat)."

According to Campbell, in addition to animal protein causing cancer, it also fuels cancer that exists. So you can have a carcinogen in your body, but it doesn't get "turned on" until you ingest animal flesh. Animal protein causes the carcinogen to grow and spread. Even so-called lean cuts of meat, as well as fish and chicken, are high in fat and protein, and as Dr. Campbell says, animal protein only causes "mischief."

Choose Health: Choose Vegetarian

From animal products doubling your risk of endometrial, to soy foods lowering your risk of contracting ovarian cancer, to carcinogenic arsenic in your chicken (and other meat, though in lower levels), to the news that animal protein is the big cause of dietary cancer (and remember, the American Cancer Society says that about 30 percent of cancer comes from what you eat!), it sure is looking like the "vegan thing" is making a lot more sense in a lot of different ways.

I highly recommend checking out The China Study to get the full scoop, which is full of fascinating information and gripping statistics. I give it out so much that I think I should be getting a commission. The book also gives tips on making the transition to a vegetarian diet, as does my last column, "One Bite at a Time: A Beginner's Guide to Conscious Eating."


Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials.
Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008.
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing.
Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008.
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
"This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror."
Post by Digby. July 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Aw, c'mon... we all know....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 24, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that there are absolutely no consequences to shitting where you eat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, come ON.
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir on Apr 24, 2007 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Veggie propaganda by a mysterious "guest blogger". How quaint.

That's all I can even say right now. This just seems like a new low on this site. Then again, I'm getting the strange feeling that the more credible writers on this site are jumping ship for better opportunities. I don't blame them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, come ON. Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
» RE: "Propoganda"?...Oh, come ON. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Excellent Resource
Posted by: channing on Apr 24, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the reference... This kind of research is what I've been looking for to help me make a fuller conversion away from an animal-based diet. Not mentioned in this particular article was the drastically reduced amount of land required to sustain a vegetarian diet, one of the main issues that convinced me to reduce by about 30% my meat intake. However, hard-data on human health will likely result in a major shift, long over-due.

I'm getting the book!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Skip the chicken, go vegetarian, save your colon
Posted by: A.T. on Apr 24, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I prefer not to eat meat because I don't want to contribute to an outrageously cruel industry, it is nice to know that the side affect is good health.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meat should be taxed
Posted by: L33C33 on Apr 24, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eating meat is unarguably bad for our health, not just b/c of cancer, but heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, etc.... So as a vegetarian, what I want to know is why should my tax money go towards health care for people who choose to eat food that will put them in the hospital? Just as there are cigarette taxes, there should be taxes on meat so that those who wish to eat meat help to compensate the financial burnden it puts on our society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article! A vegan diet helped me beat breast cancer!
Posted by: ElaineS on Apr 24, 2007 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to eat a lot of animal protein, but I went vegan after I was diagnosed with breast cancer. It's been years since I had the cancer removed, and it hasn't come back thanks to my healthy veg diet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meat Causes Cancer--no question.
Posted by: TwinsFanatic on Apr 24, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The China Study and the links in the Freston article, above, are all about organic meat, and they pinpoint animal protein as the key carcinogen.

Obviously you can get cancer as a vegetarian, and you can get lung cancer if you don't smoke, but meat is still clearly linked to cancer--read the article above, and the links in it.

Of course this doesn't mean that all meat-eaters will get cancer; only 15 percent of smokers die from lung cancer, but the causality is still clear.

Anyone with questions should read the book--it could save your life.

Check out www.VegSource.com to see Dr. Campbell's Web site (it's linked in the doctors section) and check out www.VegCooking.com for great veggie recipes, meal plans, and tons more--VegNews calls it a Culinary Motherload. Sure enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meat: it's what's rotting in your colon
Posted by: ECtek on Apr 24, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amazing that with all the strong arguments against eating meat, people continue to drop it onto their plates. Well done Freston, for being tireless about this topic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

T.I.M.
Posted by: T.I.M. on Apr 24, 2007 8:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the "killer" failure rates of most heart disease treatments -- drugs or surgery -- we can take a lesson from a very rare physician -- with a 100% success rate among his patients who followed his directions to prevent and reverse heart disease. The doctor: Caldwell Esselstyn, Jr., at the Cleveland Clinic. His simple prescription: eliminate all those foods that can cause your body harm. In plain English: Eliminate all meat and dairy products. This isn't the chicken or the egg: it's the chicken and the egg, and the burger and the steak and the rib and the bacon and..... For a meal to LIVE for, go veg!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More health evidence for veg diet
Posted by: LCT on Apr 26, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article—Freston makes some telling points about how eating animal protein can cause cancer. Another frightening issue for human health is the overuse of antibiotics on factory farms, which has caused many of the bacteria found on meat to be antibiotic-resistant. A recent report from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health said that 96% of Tyson chicken is contaminated with antibiotic-resistant campylobacter bacteria. Similarly, a USDA study found that 66% of beef samples contained antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This has dangerous implications for human food poisoning, which already kills 5000 people a year in the U.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GO VEG FOR LIFE!
Posted by: lauraf on Apr 26, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kathy Freston's article points out some very important and educational facts regarding the connection between eating animal products and human disease. Go vegan now, and your body will thank you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]