Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Earth to Politicians: Americans Support Taxing the Rich

Posted by Elana Levin at 10:55 AM on April 23, 2007.


The public get's it! America's survival depend on services like quality schools and healthcare and funds are needed to pay for that good stuff. The solution is having those who've benefited the most from our unbalanced system pay their fair share.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Editor's note: this is a guest post by Amy Traub.

Last month, I discussed a new poll by the Pew Center for People and the Press which found growing public support for progressive policy. This week another public opinion survey, the April Gallup Poll, lends support to the findings as they relate to wealth, inequality, and taxation.

Their headline for these Gallup poll results? "Americans More in Favor of Heavily Taxing Rich Now Than in 1939" The poll found:

* growing support for progressive taxation

* two-thirds of Americans believe wealth should be more evenly distributed

* a significant majority of Americans feel the wealthy currently pay too little in taxes

These results also complement the conclusions of DMI's own, more local survey of 101 New York City leaders, which revealed strong support for progressive taxation.

The accumulation of findings like these should continue to chip away at the conventional wisdom in politics which still insists that raising taxes -- including taxes on the wealthy -- is always unpopular and politically risky.

Nor is this just government-by-opinion poll. We already know that progressive taxation is good policy.

A recent article by economist Robert H. Frank reinforced the point: we can afford such vital public services as universal health coverage only if top income earners pay more taxes. What's more, both economic theory and empircal evidence demonstrate that trickle-down economics, the archaic argument against taxing the wealthy, is unsound and "ripe for abandonment."

Politicians take note.

Digg!

Tagged as: taxes, progressive tax, rich, economy, economic justice, robert frank, polls

Elana Levin is Communications Manager at The Drum Major Institute for Public Policy, a progressive policy think tank. She also is Managing Editor of the DMIblog


Race-Baiting Former Senator Jesse Helms Has Died
Conservative Republican railed against "Negro hoodlums", opposed the Voting Rights Act, backed terrorists, and died an unrepentant segregationist.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 4, 2008.
NYC Cops Harass Club Owner Whose CCTV Footage Overturned Drug Conviction
Talk about shooting the messenger.
Post by . July 4, 2008.
Watermelon is the New Viagra
USDA-funded research helps Americans put some pizazz in their picnic baskets this fourth of July.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 3, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Oops...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 23, 2007 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oops... you're talking about one of those things that whackjob keeps complaining you "fake lefties" never talk about...

But yeah... the argument against taxing the rich is that they make more contribution to our economy... gee... could that be because the rich are excluding the rest of us from our economy???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The conservative view
Posted by: kelt65 on Apr 23, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Assumes that "taxing the rich" is to make more money for the state, then proceed to demolish this strawman by trotting out all sorts of reasons why taxing the rich will make the government less money.

Taxing the rich is to prevent the rich from existing in my view. They, their ideas, and their dynasties are a cancer on society and always have been.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive Taxation: That Was Then....
Posted by: SpankyDaWheel on Apr 23, 2007 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Americans More in Favor of Heavily Taxing Rich Now Than in 1939"

I think our politicians do know this and just don't care. In 1939 they had FDR, and who do we have? Hilary Clinton? I doubt we can expect a return to progressive taxation any time soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sean Gosalves....
Posted by: brasilaron on Apr 23, 2007 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...had an article on Alternet awhile ago and one of the quotes i liked best was that the society in which you live makes the accumulation of wealth a possibility, and when seen in this light, taxes are not theft but the membership price in that society...
One of the prime directives of gov'ts around the world is to ensure social stability and social stability is often best ensured by using the largesse of that society to support the weakest or least able, otherwise you get rebellions and other forms of unrest that lead to less efficiency and less profit. I ain't no economist but taxing the wealthiest at a higher rate than the poorest just makes intuitive sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» oops, Sean Gonsalves....nm Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Sean Gosalves.... Posted by: ElanaDMI
Taxing the rich is only a piece of the pie. Government waste and budget priorities are the rest.
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 23, 2007 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spending priorities are rarely discussed because what makes sense is to take the corporations off of welfare--and to cut military expenses--and to pay teachers more--and to get medicare for all.

In other words, our national budget is so out of sync with reality that special interests can keep the dust flying to confuse the issues.

The answer? As always is leadership. Public opinion polls are not leadership. Only elected officials are leadership. When Walter Mondale talked about raising taxes in 1984, he was laughed out of contention. Reagan told us that we could borrow as much as we needed; so taxes were off the table (except for tax cuts for the rich).

And we all loved Reagan, right? He tripled the national debt, giving most of it to his GOP buddies. But what do voters care. Reagan looked good. And we want a president who looks good--how else do you explain it?

What has changed? Nothing has changed. Until the leadership in government changes, nothing will change. Now, if leaders begin talking about tax policy, it might be worth listening to. Only "might," if they give us a comprehensive policy. LOL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» True, plus... Posted by: D_comp
an HONEST debate...
Posted by: wwittman on Apr 23, 2007 9:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
an honest debate would recognise that some Americans makes 100's of millions.
Yet every time the issue of increasing taxes on "the wealthy" comes up, it seems to be defined as 'on people making more than $100,000'!

Americans don't want to hear that there is a true wealthy class. They'd rather be taken advantage of, but retain the illusion that they are "wealthy".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]