Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Supreme Court gives gift to predatory lenders

Posted by Guest Blogger at 8:37 AM on April 19, 2007.


Nathan Newman: State banking laws have just been thrown out the window.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

From Nathan Newman at TPM Cafe

In a blow to consumers, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that mortgage lending subsidiaries of national banks are exempt from state regulation. Every state attorney general and bank regulator had urged the High Court to protect these state laws, especially in light of federal inaction in the face of abuse by predatory lenders.

But the Court in its Watters v. Wachovia decision, upheld the power of the Bush Office of the Comptroller (OCC) to pass regulations shutting down such state laws. Those federal decisions, as Progressive States discussed a few weeks ago, directly fed the predatory lending mortgage bubble and helped encourage the abuses that may lead to 2.2 million subprime borrowers facing foreclosure on their home loans.

Justice Stevens, in his dissent to the decision, blasted his fellow Court members for endorsing those executive decisions, since no new Congressional action had given the OCC guidance to undermine these state laws:

Never before have we endorsed administrative action whose sole purpose was to pre-empt state law rather than to implement a statutory command.
Stevens point was that while the federal government might have the power to preempt state laws, it should only do so when Congress has clearly authorized such preemption or where the exercise of existing federal laws leave "no room for additional state regulation." Clearly, given federal inaction, there was plenty of room for state regulation in this situation, so the Court's decision is a radical expansion of executive power to undermine state power at the whim of a federal regulator.

Congressman Barney Frank, who chairs the House Banking Commitee, expressed similar outrage at the court decision: "We have to act on this ...The controller has eliminated a whole bunch of state consumer laws with nothing to put in their place."

Hopefully, instead of just passing a few additional federal consumer protections, Congress will also restore state power to add its own protections as well.

Digg!

Tagged as: banking, predatory lending


Irish Commission: "No Doubt" Catholic Church Covered Up Child Sex Abuse for 30 Years
The welfare of the children "was not even a factor to be considered" as complaints came in against clerics.
Post by Staff. November 26, 2009.
Glenn Beck Scoffs at Palin/Beck 2012 Ticket, Doesn't Like Palin's "Yapping"
The Beck/Palin dream ticket is not to be? NOOOOO!!!
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 26, 2009.
Right-Wing Culture Warriors Warn of Atheist Attack on Thanksgiving!
You've heard of the "war on Christmas" -- now the battle has engulfed a new holiday.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 26, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?