Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The emerging scandal over student loans...

Posted by Robert Reich at 11:29 AM on April 12, 2007.


Robert Reich: The Real story.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The emerging scandal over student loans - and finiancial aid administrators that have cozy relationships with lenders - is only the tip of a scandalous iceberg.

Consider: The Federal government subsidizes college loans in two different ways, giving colleges and universities the option of which way to go.

The first way is for the federal government to lend students the money directly. Students get a good deal because the government, being the government, can raise funds at a lower interest rate than can banks or other private lenders. The alternative is for the federal government to subsidize student loans indirectly by guaranteeing banks and other private lenders that if a student doesn't repay the loan, the government will. The government also gives banks and private lenders additional subsidies to ensure they get a profitable return on any student loan they make.

Obviously, this second alternative is a great deal for the banks and other lenders. Hey, a guaranteed return on a no-risk loan! But it's a lousy deal for American taxpayers. According to a study by the Center for American Progress, taxpayers pay about $7 more for every $100 lent by the private lenders than they do on direct government loans.

That amounts to billions of taxpayer dollars each year. Billions that could be saved if the direct loan program was the only program. Billions of savings that could be put, for example, into Pell Grants for needy students.

So here's the multi-billion-dollar question. Why does the federal government continue to provide colleges and universities the option of going with the more expensive program when the government can offer direct loans more cheaply? Why is it that some fifteen years after the direct student loan program was first established, more than three-quarters of student loans still come through the more expensive system?

Let me hazard a guess. Because the banks and other private lenders have enormous political clout in Washington. They also have clout within colleges and universities.

This is the real scandal of student loans, and it's got to stop. There's no good reason for the federal government to waste taxpayer money by subsidizing banks and other private lenders when government direct loans are cheaper.

Digg!

Tagged as: student loans

Robert Reich is the nation's 22nd Secretary of Labor and a professor at the University of California at Berkeley.


Krugman Says Don't Kill Senate Health Bill ... Is He Right?
I respect the Shrill One, but ...
Post by Jill C.. December 18, 2009.
Climate Talks on Verge of Collapse in Final Hours
A leaked UN documents is among a number of news items as the climate talks reach the home-stretch.
Post by Nick Berning. December 18, 2009.
Year in Review: 2009 Right-Wing Lie Machine Amped Up the Obama Madness (VIDEO)
Obama Derangement Syndrome comes from the top-down.
Post by Joshua Holland. December 18, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?