Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Abstinence-pushers abstain from ethics

Posted by RH Reality Check at 1:07 PM on April 9, 2007.


Scott Swenson: Here they are, the corrupt morality police...

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Guest post by Scott Swenson first appeared on RH Reality Check.

The pious moralizing of social conservatives grates on the national psyche, its hypocrisy evident for all to see. But it's the ethics of social conservatives sucking tax dollars from public health programs and personally profiting from them that causes concern. Congressional leaders should not just redirect federal monies from failed abstinence-only programs to proven public health strategies, they should investigate thoroughly, for they are likely to find Corruption, with a capital C, and that rhymes with T, and that stands for Trouble.

Last week, RH Reality Check wrote about the National Abstinence Education Association (NAEA), and its affiliation with Creative Research Concepts (CRC), makers of the Swift Boat ads in 2004. The team looks to intimidate policy makers with threats of aggressive lobbying and public relations campaigns, in the genre CRC redefined, smear and fear.

Today, we take a closer look at the leadership of NAEA, a group that has profited from personal connections, public appointments, and the publishing of...

... half-truths. These stories are known individually, but weaving them together underscores the illegitimacy of the billion dollar abstinence-only program and calls into question the ethics of those who preach morality, and teach nothing proven, at taxpayer expense.

Valerie Huber, Executive Director, NAEA

Abstinence-only programs she ran in Ohio contained "false or misleading information about abortion, contraceptives and sexually transmitted diseases" so stated a study done by Case Western Reserve University Department of Public Health. According to Hypothetically Speaking, a bio of Huber states: "[her] program is still in its infancy, giving Valerie the unique opportunity to develop and fine-tune it. Valerie is infusing her Christian beliefs into this program."

It's just that some people's beliefs, Christian and otherwise, start with truth telling and respect for freedom of religion; they believe that is what kids should be taught and how government should be run. Huber is not a public health expert, but an outraged mom who started a program after her son's health teacher advised kids to use condoms if they were having sex. She parlayed her outrage into an abstinence-only program and was then appointed to a state job in the Ohio Department of Health by former Gov. Bob Taft (R-OH).

As the supervisor of the Ohio Department of Health's abstinence-only program, Huber attempted to secure a state contract for a company she was involved in. She was suspended by the department in 2006 when she was found guilty of ethics violations. Huber was represented by an attorney with ties to the Ohio Republican Party and the heir to the corrupt Taft regime, failed gubernatorial candidate Ken Blackwell, as reported in the Ohio newspaper, the Gay People's Chronicle.

Bruce Cook, Board Director

Like Valerie Huber, Cook was caught with his hands in the cookie jar. As the Chairman of the Georgia State Department of Human Resources he used his public position to promote his private business, the abstinence-only program Choosing the Best.

While serving the citizens of Georgia, Cook cut funding for teen pregnancy prevention programs, closing 39 centers that provided services in an effort to replace them with just five that taught abstinence-only. He also cut family planning funding that left 64,000 women without services, while he worked to create wealth for himself.

Cook, however, argued the cuts targeted prevention programs that don't show "measurable results"--despite data showing lower teen pregnancy rates in counties with teen health centers.

According to Creative Loafing:

Some of the teen centers handed out condoms, and because Cook is known as an outspoken evangelical Christian who earns a living publishing abstinence-only educational materials, many DHR insiders saw the move as an attempt to impose his own far-right ideological agenda on public health policy.
Then, in October 2004, Cook appeared at a DHR-funded conference on abstinence education, where he touted his own book and promoted the programs offered by his for-profit company, Choosing the Best.
Around the same time, the DHR board decided to keep the teen centers open but mandated that at least half of their educational content adhere to strict, abstinence-only guidelines. Only after CL reported the potential windfall for Cook's business did he announce he would no longer sell materials to DHR subsidiaries. Cook's company had been criticized in a national study for providing misleading health information, such as exaggerating failure rates for condoms.

Anne Badgley, Board Director

Anne Badgley started the abstinence-only program Heritage in South Carolina, and was a fundraiser for President Bush. Her investment in him paid off well, as his administration has diverted millions of taxpayer dollars to her organization. Badgley was removed from her volunteer position leading the abstinence-only programs in South Carolina, where she was described as "controversial" by the Charleston Post and Courier.
School District Superintendent Ron McWhirt made the decision last week, saying that the "health and sex education program is too important and sensitive to be led by a volunteer who cannot be held accountable as a school district employee."
Badgley might be more comfortable in a Burka because her Heritage materials suggest that "girls have a responsibility to wear modest clothing that doesn't invite lustful thoughts," according to Tell Them SC.

LeAnna Benn, Board Director

LeAnna Benn started Teen-AID in Spokane, Washington. While touting the success of her materials and program, encouraging communities to buy them, she was routinely asked to furnish information about where the materials were being used. She said she hadn't kept track. While that lack of accountability won't get you in hot water with the ethics committee, it certainly raises questions about the integrity of the program and her sense of accountability. According to a journalist who has reviewed materials put out by Teen-Aid:
I have examined several of Teen-Aid's items, including both Sexuality, Commitment & Family and Me, My World, My Future. All the pieces that I have seen are overtly polemical in both purpose and style, all rely on obvious and outrageous distortions, and some deal in pseudoscience whose falsity will be evident to anyone who has had any respectable education at all.

According to People for the American Way "the curricula are filled with sexist bias, religious bias and racist and classist comments. For example, the text editorializes against marriages across class boundaries:
Sociologists have found that when similar economic backgrounds (`social class') and educational levels are disregarded by couples, marriage adjustment is very difficult. Different cultural backgrounds are also hurdles too high for some couples to negotiate.

The curricula provide no information on sexual orientation, and depict non-traditional families in a negative light.

Scott Phelps, Board Director

Scott Phelps is the Vice Chairman of the Abstinence & Marriage Education Partnership.

Phelps' teaching of abstinence was described in the New York Times as a one-way street, "At no point do the teachers invite questions, which could pull the classes into unplanned areas." A student who attended the class reviewed Phelps' class by saying ''they shouldn't hide anything that we need to know to keep safe.''

In what Fact-Esque calls a "Pro-Cancer Statement," Scott Phelps said, "Sexually transmitted diseases in the United States will not be contained by injecting vaccines into pre-adolescents in anticipation of promiscuous behavior," referring to the proven ability of the HPV vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, but the unproven claim that it will lead to promiscuity. As columnist Nick Kristoff observed about emergency contraception, "umbrellas don't cause rain."

Phelps has railed against gay men fo spreading AIDS, but has little to say about spreading AIDS to women through heterosexual marraige as he works against contracpetion and empowering women to make life decisions about whether and when to have children.

Joanne Mackenzie, Board Director

Joanne Mackenzie started the abstinence program WAIT Training. SIECUS concludes of WAIT Training, "its reliance on messages of fear and shame make it inappropriate for schools."

According to Fundiewatch, Mackenzie said, "I don't want kids to equate sex with disease. I want them to equate sex with love and tenderness and long-term romance, and all those yummy things that the heart longs for."

Yes, but love and tenderness would also involve truth and the information, trust and respect for teens to make responsible life decisions for themselves, based on respect for their bodies and their partners. That would be yummiest of all.

I don't know about you, dear reader, but after writing this piece I need a shower, and not a cold one, a hot one. I feel so dirty.

Digg!

Tagged as: feminism, abstinence, sex education, swift boaters

Scott Swenson blogs for RH Reality Check.


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Their very willingness to lie...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Apr 9, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...so much, their absolute refusal to look at studies that say abstinence only "education" causes more STDs, more pregnancies (and more need for abortion), and causes more deaths either from back-room abortions or from forced pregnancies that kill mother and child, especially when the mother IS a child if an anti-abortion law has been passed, their willingness to cherry-pick biblican quotes for authority, their sheer enthusiasm for causing harm to those they insist they're protecting says to me that a)they are NOT Christians, b)b they are not Americans in the ideological sense of the word, and c) they are NOT "decent people" by any stretch of the imagination.

Decent people do not regard an agonizing death caused by their lies as a "punishment from God; a good example for others who sin" (they seem not to mind if a fetus dies providing a good example). Their willingness to ride roughshod over the very idea of democracy in order to pass laws favored by a small minority any way they can get it passed is not American, not democratic, not even Christian. Fixed elections and doctored counting machine ARE decried in the Bible, in the strongest term! The biblical penalty for a human-induced abortion is relatively minor; the bible clearly does NOT see an embryo or a fetus as a human being, so the penalty is NOT the same as for murder. For that matter, a miscarriage is, in the bible, considered to be the same as a woman's regular menses. The bible nowhere recognizes abortion as a crime, or a fetus or embryo as a child, much less a "sentient being".

But Bush's churchy base has NO trouble lying about it, and causing FAR more harm than good education and timely medical care does. Just as a fairly recent study concluded that the anti-drug laws and the War on Drugs cause a TREMENDOUS amount of harm compared to the harm the drugs might cause. Well, they lie about that too; doesn't bother 'em a bit. Nor does lying about this being "a Christian country from the beginning", which it wasn't and isn't; or about what the drug laws are based on (it SURE as Hell isn't about protecting people). And on, and on, and on, and on...

So WHY are we still listening to them?

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hateful Hypocritical Monsters
Posted by: marid on Apr 9, 2007 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These delusional monsters who reside behind the shield of religion are no better than Al Queda or Hamas.

A fundamentalist nut in any country and any religion should be shunned and stopped. Oh wait we can't stop them, religion always trumps in any dicussion in the US.

The really sick part is that they fool so many good people into believing their drivel and hate speech. They never allow facts to cloud the issue. Learned that from the Liar in Chief.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hateful Hypocritical Monsters Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Amazed, But Not Surprised
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 9, 2007 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When are these tin-hat wearing Holier-Than-Thou types going to get their sanctimonious heads out of their arse and realize that abstinence is a failed policy based upon false assumptions. To any who might not know- teens have sex. Most of them. Even yours in all probability. Many have even had some level of same-sex experience out of curiosity. Some know or suspect they are L/G/B/T. Get over it.

Given that knowledge and the acceptance that sexual exploration among teens is about as normal as mustard on a hot dog, the only things that matter are these:

1- Teaching teens that no means no.
2- Preventing unwanted pregnancy.
3- Prevention of the spread of STD's.
4- Destroying the myths around sexual orientation and identity.

Everything else is bullsh*t.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A really huge flaw in the arguments for "abstinence only" that no one talks about...
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Apr 11, 2007 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about an actual virgin who marries a man who was sexually active in the past and took no preventative measures? He may claim that he is also a virgin. How would she know? What about these "born again virgins?" Are they encouraged to get checked for STDs? Do they? How many women have claimed to be virgins that were not? Would a virgin male know the difference?

In other words, it's possible to follow all their stupid rules and still get infected with a STD. Fact is, it happens all the time. More telling, rates of infection for people who have taken abstinence pledges are identical to those who have not.

A warning to those who think that all the "Just say no" tripe will "protect" your young daughter's virginity. In years past (I'm happily and monogamously married now) I found that a little technique combined with simple biology made seduction of any girl who was attracted to me in the slightest almost boringly easy. It's only a matter of time. If you think even the most intensive conditioning can overcome a million years of evolution, you're living in a dream world - whether you believe in evolution or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]