Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Newsletter

AlterNet Headlines

 

Video archive by date:

«November 2009»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

Use » and « to view other months.

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rachel Maddow on the Orrin Hatch/Alberto Gonzales dilemma [VIDEO]

Posted by Rachel Maddow at 7:22 AM on April 3, 2007.


How to show loyalty to Bush while dumping on the guy whose job you seek...
Post Tools
email EMAIL
print PRINT
5 COMMENTS
maddowgonz

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

RSS iconVideo RSS Feed

RSS iconMain AlterNet RSS Feed

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Air America's Rachel Maddow parses the appearance of hard-to-find supporter of Alberto Gonzales Orrin Hatch -- a man who also seeks to take his job.

Shorter Hatch: He's not that bad, I think. And he's Latino!

Digg!

Tagged as: alberto gonzales, rachel maddow, orrin hatch

Rachel Maddow is the host of her own show on Air America Radio. She has a doctorate in political science (she was a Rhodes Scholar) and a background in HIV/AIDS activism, prison reform, and other lefty rabblerousing.


Return to Video  » Post Tools: email EMAIL print PRINT 5 COMMENTS PERMALINK
Also in Video
House Will Take Up-or-Down Vote on Stupak Amendment, Threatening Women's Rights
The House leadership bows to anti-choice congressmen, allowing them a vote on an anti-choice amendment to the health-care bill.
Post by RH Reality Check. November 7, 2009.		 Video: Tancredo Storms Off MSNBC Set, "Insulted" by Markos Moulitsas
The former Colorado congressman demanded an apology from Moulitsas for reference to his Vietnam War deferment.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.		 The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated. 		View:
Yeah...
[Report this comment]
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 3, 2007 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems the nature of politicians is on display more than usual in all of this in that no one seems to be able to tell the truth or actually stick to any facts.

All we hear now is how people "remember" things to have happened. I'm sure given that option as an out Clinton never would have remembered Monica at all.. and everyone ever tried in the Hague would have forgotten all about all those people they raped and/or killed.

How wonderful that now Republicans want to just be able to remember things differently to absolve themselves of all wrongdoing.. and then call those who would prosecute their crimes partisan witch hunters.

It goes along with that pseudo-secret concept of "creating reality" that the Reps in the white house squak about. Those who attempt to study the actual reality are "left behind" because the White House bunch are already ahead of them manipulating and creating reality. In other words... they are lying to us about the way the world is. It doesn't just describe a political elite out of touch with the people... it describes a political elite sliding into actual self-induced psychosis.

And this from the party that claims to be chock full of "hard headed realists"...

Now they, much like the coffee.. and just plain chock full o' nuts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THAT'S VERY STRANGE..
[Report this comment]
Posted by: Astroboy on Apr 3, 2007 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I thought dinosaurs were extinct!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

should have been a single point
[Report this comment]
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Apr 3, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hatch pulling the race card was not addressed properly, and in my opinion, this piece shows that he has successfully re-routed the arguement to one of race (no matter how convoluted). the first part was good: Hatch is a liar , although i noticed she managed to put in a "i think" to keep the lawyers away...
the second part was bad and she fell into his trap, which she actually used as her closer.

DO NOT GET REDIRECTED INTO ONE OF THE RIGHTS MOST FAVORITE WAYS OF DERAILING ARGUEMENT FROM THE FACTS. DO NOT TAKE THEIR RACE BAIT, DO NOT TAKE THEIR ABORTION BAIT, DO NOT REDIRECT YOUR ARGUEMENTS IN A DIRECTION THAT IS SO OBVIOUSLY SCRIPTED...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Richardson is a bull in a china shop
[Report this comment]
Posted by: Richard Dinelli on Apr 5, 2007 4:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's odd to see people like Bill Donahue not get it. He gives the guy a death threat and then complains that the artist is claiming "victim status."

Bill Donahue has made his career debating ideas. He ups ideas and he downs ideas. And he does not see that there's a difference when he is talking to the very person who's idea or art it was. He's like a bull in a china shop. For this interview, he ought to have let his ideological struggle go just for a few minutes, and talk to this person as if he were a real person who deserved respect.

The artist has a point. It's christian folklore which the art embodies. Bill Donahue's christ is exactly what's portrayed there - except it's in chocolate, and nude, as human beings are in their true form.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]