Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama Pastor rips NY Times a new one, gently

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 11:03 AM on March 22, 2007.


"Thank you for engaging in one of the biggest misrepresentations of the truth I have ever seen in sixty-five years."

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

I do as Skeptical Brotha does and offer this letter without comment...

March 11, 2007
Jodi Kantor
The New York Times
9 West 43rd Street
New York,
New York 10036-3959

Dear Jodi:

Thank you for engaging in one of the biggest misrepresentations of the truth I have ever seen in sixty-five years. You sat and shared with me for two hours. You told me you were doing a "Spiritual Biography" of Senator Barack Obama. For two hours, I shared with you how I thought he was the most principled individual in public service that I have ever met.

For two hours, I talked with you about how idealistic he was. For two hours I shared with you what a genuine human being he was. I told you how incredible he was as a man who was an African American in public service, and as a man who refused to announce his candidacy for President until Carol Moseley Braun indicated one way or the other whether or not she was going to run. I told you what a dreamer he was. I told you how idealistic he was. We talked about how refreshing it would be for someone who knew about Islam to be in the Oval Office. Your own question to me was, Didn't I think it would be incredible to have somebody in the Oval Office who not only knew about Muslims, but had living and breathing Muslims in his own family?

I told you how important it would be to have a man who not only knew the difference between Shiites and Sunnis prior to 9/11/01 in the Oval Office, but also how important it would be to have a man who knew what Sufism was; a man who understood that there were different branches of Judaism; a man who knew the difference between Hasidic Jews, Orthodox Jews, Conservative Jews and Reformed Jews; and a man who was a devout Christian, but who did not prejudge others because they believed something other than what he believed.

I talked about how rare it was to meet a man whose Christianity was not just "in word only."

I talked about Barack being a person who lived his faith and did not argue his faith. I talked about Barack as a person who did not draw doctrinal lines in the sand nor consign other people to hell if they did not believe what he believed.

Out of a two-hour conversation with you about Barack's spiritual journey and my protesting to you that I had not shaped him nor formed him, that I had not mentored him or made him the man he was, even though I would love to take that credit, you did not print any of that. When I told you, using one of your own Jewish stories from the Hebrew Bible as to how God asked Moses, "What is that in your hand?," that Barack was like that when I met him. Barack had it "in his hand." Barack had in his grasp a uniqueness in terms of his spiritual development that one is hard put to find in the 21st century, and you did not print that.

As I was just starting to say a moment ago, Jodi, out of two hours of conversation I spent approximately five to seven minutes on...

... Barack's taking advice from one of his trusted campaign people and deeming it unwise to make me the media spotlight on the day of his announcing his candidacy for the Presidency and what do you print?

You and your editor proceeded to present to the general public a snippet, a printed "sound byte" and a titillating and tantalizing article about his disinviting me to the Invocation on the day of his announcing his candidacy.

I have never been exposed to that kind of duplicitous behavior before, and I want to write you publicly to let you know that I do not approve of it and will not be party to any further smearing of the name, the reputation, the integrity or the character of perhaps this nation's first (and maybe even only) honest candidate offering himself for public service as the person to occupy the Oval Office.

Your editor is a sensationalist. For you to even mention that makes me doubt your credibility, and I am looking forward to see how you are going to butcher what else I had to say concerning Senator Obama's "Spiritual Biography."

Our Conference Minister, the Reverend Jane Fisler Hoffman, a white woman who belongs to a Black church that Hannity of "Hannity and Colmes" is trying to trash, set the record straight for you in terms of who I am and in terms of who we are as the church to which Barack has belonged for over twenty years.

The president of our denomination, the Reverend John Thomas, has offered to try to help you clarify in your confused head what Trinity Church is even though you spent the entire weekend with us setting me up to interview me for what turned out to be a smear of the Senator; and yet The New York Times continues to roll on making the truth what it wants to be the truth.

I do not remember reading in your article that Barack had apologized for listening to that bad information and bad advice. Did I miss it? Or did your editor cut it out? Either way, you do not have to worry about hearing anything else from me for you to edit or "spin" because you are more interested in journalism than in truth.

Forgive me for having a momentary lapse. I forgot that The New York Times was leading the bandwagon in trumpeting why it is we should have gone into an illegal war. The New York Times became George Bush and the Republican Party's national "blog."  The New York Times played a role in the outing of Valerie Plame. I do not know why I thought The New York Times had actually repented and was going to exhibit a different kind of behavior. Maybe it was my faith in the Jewish Holy Day of Roshashana. Maybe it was my being caught up in the euphoria of the Season of Lent; but whatever it is or was, I was sadly mistaken. There is no repentance on the part of The New York Times. There is no integrity when it comes to The Times. You should do well with that paper, Jodi. You looked me straight in my face and told me a lie!

Sincerely and respectfully yours,
Reverend Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. ,
Senior Pastor
Trinity United Church of Christ

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, election08, church, media coverage

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Oh No! The Dictionary Has a Liberal Bias!
Is nothing sacred?
Post by Roy Edroso. July 5, 2009.
Amid 2012 Hopefuls' Career Implosions, Future Looks Bleak for GOP
Where are they going from here?
Post by Booman. July 5, 2009.
Yes Men Say No to Jerusalem Film Festival
The famous political pranksters withdraw latest flick in support of divestment movement.
Post by Staff. July 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I Think The NYTimes Needs To Respond To This
Posted by: ZPaul on Mar 22, 2007 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this is serious enough that the NYTimes needs to give this man, and the public an explanation. A clear explanation. What´s more, I think the public should demand it. And take careful note; if we do, we are likely to see what the true colors of the people involved are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I wouldn't hold my breath Posted by: xconservative
Tabloid trash
Posted by: AlienSlave on Mar 22, 2007 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will people learn that is just tabloid smut journalist are bred and educated to write? You would be better off giving your estate into the hands of trial lawyers or signing your paycheck and letting a Congressmen deposit it into your savings account for you. Welcome to the real world Pastor.
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tabloid trash Posted by: Thresher
Yellow Journalism
Posted by: compubomb on Mar 22, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New York Times was the primary newspaper involved in what today we now call Yellow Journalism. During the period in which they systematically made the public believe that cannabis was a drug that made people go crazy and or become passive and all the thieves, crooks, and killers smoked it. Even though one of the primary reasons to help outlaw the drug was to help the then owner of the New York Times who had a vested interest in the lumber industry completely get rid of the hemp industry as it was a fine source to compete with the lumber paper companies. Either way you look at it, most newspapers have a bias view and generally have an objective before they get their evidence, with enough experience on hand, you can spin a story any way you like, and the consistency principle will make the public think it's true.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow!
Posted by: Jeanne on Mar 22, 2007 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brilliant letter. I was breathless, inspired, outraged. I do not read the NY Times, so this entire tale is completely new to me. It has affected my opinion of Barack Obama positively. I have been skeptical of Obama's sincerity vs his ambition. I am more confident now that he may be the real deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why does the writer end his letter with......
Posted by: tap17x on Mar 23, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.........."sincerely and respectfully yours?" It undermines his whole point. He should have said "sincerely and contemptuously yours." I'm a long-time reader of the Los Angeles Times, thinking it was a slightly inferior version of the NYT plus local coverage of So Cal. Now I'm thinking that it's one of very few papers left with some integrity, another being the Washington Post. So far as I'm concerned, the NYT has lost all credibility, for if it publishes crap like this, how do you know what articles in it you can trust?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dumb guy
Posted by: kathat on Mar 23, 2007 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't figure out why he thought he needed to talk about Obama anyway. Especially about the sensitive topic of religion. He needs to butt out and keep his lips zipped. Couldn't he figure it out?? Why on earth did he think anyone cared about what he thought about Obama??I think he ought to examine his own reasons for speaking to the press.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dumb guy NOT Posted by: carcinoid112
loyal Times reader--once
Posted by: citizenjoe on Mar 23, 2007 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the NYT most of my life. I grew up with it. The Times is now trash. I wonder if perhaps my eyes are finally open and that the Times was always trash. Maybe so. Two or three fine op ed writers (Krugman, Herbert, Dowd,Rich) are merely flowers blooming on this dung heap. There are other things that grow there too- out-right racists like Brooks and Friedman. But its the dung hill that really stinks!

What does this say about a country? Now a totalitarian corporate order? Is it fascism? Mabe so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: loyal Times reader--once Posted by: hapenny
what was this letter printed in?
Posted by: mr. green on Mar 23, 2007 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just curious, where was this letter printed? new york times?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tedrad
Posted by: tedrad on Mar 23, 2007 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This letter confirms that I was right in recently unsubscribing from even the email version of the New York Times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Reverend Overreacted
Posted by: msluderitz on Mar 25, 2007 10:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I rarely read the NYT, therefore I won't judge the quality of it's journalism in general. It seemed to me, however, that Kantor's intent was to spotlight implications of "disinviting" Reverend Wright to the speakers' platform while Obama announced his candidacy for President. From that standpoint the article appears to to be factually accurate, fairly balanced, and does not contradict the Reverend's description of his conversation with the reporter. It is for the public to decide if Obama made a good decision.

The reporter may have been less than forthright about her intentions, but it doesn't appear she misrepresented what Wright said. The Reverend may have expected Ms. Kantor to produce a puff piece, which would have been the result if she had parroted everything he enumerated in his response. That would have been the greater breach of journalistic responsibility, in my opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]