Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Media Blacks Out Iran Peace Delegation Representing 50+ Million in US

Posted by Bruce Wilson at 12:59 PM on March 4, 2007.


Bruce Wilson: Pro-Nuclear War Lobbying Group Gets More Attention

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In their book The Record of The Paper : How The New York Times Misreports US Foreign Policy, Howard Friel and Richard Falk amply document how New York Times mis-reporting helped pave the way for the US invasion of Iraq.

[they] demonstrate how the newspaper of record in the United States has consistently, over the last 50 years, misreported the facts related to the wars waged by the United States. From Vietnam in the 1960s to Nicaragua in the 1980s and Iraq today, the authors accuse the New York Times of serial distortions. They claim that such coverage now threatens not only world legal order but constitutional democracy in the United States.

In late February 2007, delegates representing the National Council Of Churches, which has roughly 45 million members, and other religious groups traveled to Iran and met with top Iranian religious and political leaders, in hopes of increasing trust and reducing tensions that might lead to war between the US and Iran. On Monday February 26th the delegation gave a Washington press conference about the trip. Beyond a vitriolic New York Post parody of the delegation Not a single major US media venue has opted to cover the story.

Ironically, New York Times has just published a story about how the anti-war "Out of Iraq [US] Congressional Caucus" has been blacked out by the media, but the Times is itself appears to be blacking out the story of a peace delegation to Iran representing upwards of perhaps 60 million Americans or more. (see interview with delegate member Jim Winkler)

Meanwhile, the NYT - which has so far declined to cover the peace efforts - opted to run a February 7th op-ed. that appears to treat favorably a new Christian "pro-Israel" lobbying group that advocates for a US nuclear attack on Iran and whose founder says publicly that he thinks the war he wants (for religious reasons) will set in motion a global conflict that he thinks could kill most Jews on Earth. Also, top GOP leaders meet often with Mr. Hagee. Are these GOP leaders just "pandering", eh ? Well, we sure better hope they are. Dick Armey says George W. Bush believes in the "End Times", "The Rapture", "The Apocalypse" and so on but says GW isn't trying to actually make those things happen. How lucky do we feel ?

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, christian, iraq, peace, new york times, mccain, hagee, apocalypse, ncc, national council of churc, winkler, antiwar

Bruce Wilson writes for Talk To Action, a blog specializing in faith and politics.


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Labeling for "News"
Posted by: JackieHK on Mar 4, 2007 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Media reform ought to be the Democrats' top priority. Without an honest media reporting the national conversation___they__and people of good intention who want to get a message heard are shut out.

A "news" organization ought to earn the label "news", just as a food may have to earn the label "organic". The regulation could go something like this:

-- Can't control more than one medium.
-- No direct lies, not checked by second source (e.g. Judith Miller)
-- No lies by omission. (E.g. If, as happened in Feb 2003, there is a massive rally of 100,000 people in the city after which your paper is named, protesting an ill-advised war___you ought to report it on your front page. The NYT did not. Talk about being a newspaper in a democracy!)
-- All media outlets who do not earn and keep a "news" certification, cannot claim to be news organizations. They can only refer to themselves as "Special Interest Opinion Providers (SIOPs)."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Terrible idea Posted by: YogiBear
Hannity Covered This
Posted by: lessbread on Mar 4, 2007 10:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Flipping channels the other day I caught five minutes of his show were he was haranguing two pastors for meeting with Ahmadinejad and thus allowing themselves to become propaganda stoolies for holocaust denial, wiping Israel off the map and so on. Needlesstosay Hannity's performance was disgusting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate media a danger to democracy
Posted by: Alan8 on Mar 5, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporate control of media is a clear and present danger to democracy. Censorship is just one symptom. Corporate news has "underestimated" the sizes of public demonstrations for decades.

AOL.COM silently deletes all email from buzzflash.com and whatreallyhappend.com and who knows what else. For a while, Comcast was silently deleting every email that even MENTIONED afterdowningstreet.org!

It's not clear what to do about this. Passing laws that would be enforced by the government opens up the door for other kinds of abuse, even if we could get our corporate-financed representatives to do it.

One thing in our favor is our superior numbers. It would help if we could cause some kind of unpleasant consequences to the corporations that censor or propagandize our news.

I would encourage people to join www.fair.org (Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting) and www.eff.org (the Electronic Frontier Foundation). These organizations help keep citizens aware of abuses, and coordinate email campaigns to complain about the worst offenses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]