Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coulter, Edwards, and Mitt Romney's "Faggot" Problem [VIDEO]

Posted by Richard Blair at 7:47 AM on March 3, 2007.


Richard Blair: Ann Coulter isn't worth the expense of energy to bang the keyboards, even as I now write about her latest tirade...
coulterfaggot

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Under normal circumstances, I wouldn't waste my time jamming a single byte down the tubes of the internets ranting about Ann Coulter. She's just not worth the expense of energy to bang the keyboards, even as I now write about her latest verbal IED against progressives and liberals. We already know what she's all about.

For as long as Newt's "Contract on America" has been in force, Coulter has been working the rubber chicken circuit and entertaining conservatives nationwide. Yesterday, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, she crossed a line that even the most rabid right wing foamers would stay away from: she called Democratic Party presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot".

With 43 ill-considered words, Coulter once again emerged as the public face of the Republican Party, and in the process, probably torpedoed the presidential aspirations of at least one GOP candidate (Mitt Romney). Guilt by association, etc. etc. That's how radioactive she's become.

The Edwards campaign responded last night via email:

This is just a taste of the filth that the right-wing machine is gearing up to throw at us. And now that it's begun, we have a choice: Do we sit back, or do we fight back? ...
Coulter's attack was no accident. It happened on national television at one of the year's biggest conservative conferences. Dick Cheney and most of the Republican candidates were in the audience. She was even introduced by Mitt Romney...
Absolutely correct that it was no accident. Some would say that crap like this just flows from Ann Coulter's mouth - but her remarks were well scripted, and intended to incite. As Joe Gandelman from Moderate Voice opines:
In this case, Coulter didn't just throw red meat. She hurled the entire cow.
There are two pieces of good news in all of this:

  • Coulter's invective is being panned on both the left and right. Visit Moderate Voice for a roundup of blogosphere commentary. When Michelle Malkin has to hold her nose at something that Coulter says, you know it's bad, and the Republican damage control experts know it's bad.

  • John Edwards' campaign couldn't have purchased this kind of publicity, or received better "bulletin board material" to pump up supporters, for a million dollars. For that, the Edwards campaign should be sending Coulter a bouquet of roses via floral backchannels.


It's widely acknowledged that Ann Coulter lives for this kind of publicity. The fact that someone like me is breaking an unwritten personal rule and documenting her atrocities is testament to her drawing power. Controversey is her bread and butter and paycheck, and sells her polemics. As long as Republican organizers of events like CPAC continue to pay her engagement fee to shock liberals and conservatives alike, she's gonna do her schtick.

And Fox News is going to continue to use her as a voice of the GOP.

Digg!

Tagged as: coulter, mitt romney, john edwards, cpac

Richard Blair is a freelance writer from the Philadelphia area, and the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Murdoch and Murdoch Flak Confused About Racism, Truth
What must it be like to do spin for News Corps?
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 11, 2009.
Right-Wing Pundits Now Lecturing the Military: Bases Need More Guns
Logically more guns would mean less shootings, right? Wait ...
Post by Eric Boehlert. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Keep it up little Annie . . .
Posted by: Knowmad on Mar 3, 2007 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you're playing right into our hands, though I don't imagine you're bright enough to realise it. Please keep telling everyone just how awful the left is, and how much you just love your rightwing buddies, and agree with everything they say and how much they love you.
You just can't buy this kind of support.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep it up little Annie . . . Posted by: Moore Hognutz
Ann Coulter
Posted by: Bbear41 on Mar 3, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't call her the "B" word because I have nothing aginst lady canines.
I won't call her the "W" word, because the witches I know are NICE people.
Just call her an "itch"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» poetic Posted by: brasilaron
dmk
Posted by: dmk on Mar 3, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it interesting that Andy Coulter would make a remark like that about John Edwards. Hasn't anyone noticed the completely out of character behavior for a woman, the prominent Adam's Apple, and the complete lack of curves on this person????????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dmk Posted by: RaW
» RE: dmk Posted by: scorpioeagle1950
Coulter paid by Dems to say stuff like that?
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Mar 3, 2007 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here's on link that was on HuffPost that almost makes you think that Coulter is saying this stuff to help raise money for the Dems.
www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/03/03/ edwards-hopes-to-raise-c_n_42526.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not likely Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Not likely Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Not likely Posted by: lessbread
You'd think the editors would avoid using pornographic thumbnails.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Mar 3, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now I'll have to remember to not be interested in alternet while on break at work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Madame X
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Mar 3, 2007 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Couldn't this person be referred to without using her name and picture, and thus feeding her ego and audience? For that matter, I don't like hearing her viciousness repeated over and over, no matter by whom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She's not a lesbian
Posted by: Jeanne on Mar 3, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I saw this reported on Countdown, I had my usual reaction to the specter of Coulter's image on the screen. "She's a closet homosexual." I uncharitably remarked. I know that it's beneath me to make ad hominem attacks on anyone simply because she disgusts me. I know better. Anyway, being a lesbian is not bad. Being Ann Coulter is bad. My 16-yr old corrected me. "She's not a lesbian. She's a man." "You don't think anyone that ugly could be anything but a man in drag, do you?" You know, now that you mention it . . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heck, that picture looks better than the REAL Coulter
Posted by: Ellie1 on Mar 3, 2007 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and where's the adam's apple?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don´t Just Go After Annie!!!
Posted by: ZPaul on Mar 5, 2007 2:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, don´t simply go after her, go after the Republican party for associating publicly with her, and inviting her TIME and AGAIN. There can be NO excuse, after the repeated invitations to Republican events (such as a recent one in Florida, lil´bro Jeb´s state) and applauses, for them to say she "does not represent true Republican thought". If the Dems let the Repubs get away with this one, I am GIVING UP ON THEM!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don´t Just Go After Annie!!! Posted by: peacefullaim
For a Really Good Time...
Posted by: Plexius on Mar 5, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
read Bachem Macuno's hilarious post about Ane Culturd. It is absolutely one of the funniest pieces of writing I have ever encountered. You can find it here:

http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ann Coulter....
Posted by: custersbud on Mar 5, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a credit to her species. Now, if we could only figure out what it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ann Coulter.... Posted by: monkeywrench
Don't get careless...
Posted by: RichietheC on Mar 5, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..you misspelled controversy. Otherwise, this is great.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The audience, too
Posted by: elcanche on Mar 5, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't help but shake my head at the applause of the audience who obviously thought that "faggot" was a clever and pithy word to use while attacking a presidential candidate. Every man and woman in that room who put their hands together for those spiteful remarks are as guilty as Ms. Coulter. They should all be ashamed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

shouldn't have broken your rule
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Mar 5, 2007 4:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that was just bizarre, but as usual, do you expect anything less from that intelectual invalid.
she's definitely earned a place in the history books with regards to democracy in the US, kinda like that guy that shot Lincoln (what was his name again?)...
Keep it up annie, you may even smudge the name anne so bad it drops out of fashion...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, Ann! (Or, is it "Andy?")
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 5, 2007 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
"Coulter's invective is being panned on both the left and right."

Great. . . . Then why do they keep giving air time to this poster girl (boy? transsexual? "decline to state?") for Tourette's Syndrome?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who really gives a crap?
Posted by: oneyedjack on Mar 6, 2007 2:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the information (infotainment) age isn't all it's cracked up to be. Overload tends to make dunces of all of us. I mean, like, why does Alternet - or any other SUPPOSED progressive site/mag/paper, etc. lend any credence to folks like coulter by joining in the National Enquirerazation syndrome? Or should I say the Anna Nicole type media showmanship?
I just don't give a rat's ass about coulter or what she says or does. If and when someone grows the cojones to just go up and slap the dog-sh** out of her, that would be news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]