Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coulter, Edwards, and Mitt Romney's "Faggot" Problem [VIDEO]

Posted by Richard Blair at 7:47 AM on March 3, 2007.


Richard Blair: Ann Coulter isn't worth the expense of energy to bang the keyboards, even as I now write about her latest tirade...
coulterfaggot

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Under normal circumstances, I wouldn't waste my time jamming a single byte down the tubes of the internets ranting about Ann Coulter. She's just not worth the expense of energy to bang the keyboards, even as I now write about her latest verbal IED against progressives and liberals. We already know what she's all about.

For as long as Newt's "Contract on America" has been in force, Coulter has been working the rubber chicken circuit and entertaining conservatives nationwide. Yesterday, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, she crossed a line that even the most rabid right wing foamers would stay away from: she called Democratic Party presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot".

With 43 ill-considered words, Coulter once again emerged as the public face of the Republican Party, and in the process, probably torpedoed the presidential aspirations of at least one GOP candidate (Mitt Romney). Guilt by association, etc. etc. That's how radioactive she's become.

The Edwards campaign responded last night via email:

This is just a taste of the filth that the right-wing machine is gearing up to throw at us. And now that it's begun, we have a choice: Do we sit back, or do we fight back? ...
Coulter's attack was no accident. It happened on national television at one of the year's biggest conservative conferences. Dick Cheney and most of the Republican candidates were in the audience. She was even introduced by Mitt Romney...
Absolutely correct that it was no accident. Some would say that crap like this just flows from Ann Coulter's mouth - but her remarks were well scripted, and intended to incite. As Joe Gandelman from Moderate Voice opines:
In this case, Coulter didn't just throw red meat. She hurled the entire cow.
There are two pieces of good news in all of this:

  • Coulter's invective is being panned on both the left and right. Visit Moderate Voice for a roundup of blogosphere commentary. When Michelle Malkin has to hold her nose at something that Coulter says, you know it's bad, and the Republican damage control experts know it's bad.

  • John Edwards' campaign couldn't have purchased this kind of publicity, or received better "bulletin board material" to pump up supporters, for a million dollars. For that, the Edwards campaign should be sending Coulter a bouquet of roses via floral backchannels.


It's widely acknowledged that Ann Coulter lives for this kind of publicity. The fact that someone like me is breaking an unwritten personal rule and documenting her atrocities is testament to her drawing power. Controversey is her bread and butter and paycheck, and sells her polemics. As long as Republican organizers of events like CPAC continue to pay her engagement fee to shock liberals and conservatives alike, she's gonna do her schtick.

And Fox News is going to continue to use her as a voice of the GOP.

Digg!

Tagged as: coulter, mitt romney, john edwards, cpac

Richard Blair is a freelance writer from the Philadelphia area, and the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


Ivana Trump, Second Nigerian Man Escorted Off Airplanes
It's like there's something in the H2O on these flights.
Post by Joshua Holland. December 27, 2009.
X-Mas Terror Elicits the Expected Response from Greater Wingnuttia
Nigeria!
Post by Tintin. December 26, 2009.
Crazy Idiot Sets Off Firecrackers on an Airplane ... You Know What this Means, Right?
Thanks, Jerk
Post by Thers. December 26, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?