Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Jim Webb demands answers about Bush's authority to attack Iran

Posted by Joshua Holland at 9:29 AM on February 28, 2007.


Apparently, the Senator won’t accept gobbledy-gook for an answer.
webb
webb

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Waaaay back in January, Jim Webb asked Condi Rice a simple yes or no question about the administration and Iran.

TPM had the blow-by-blow. Webb asked: “Is it the position of this administration that it possesses the authority to take unilateral action against Iran, in the absence of a direct threat, without congressional approval?”

She deferred an answer, saying, "I'm really loathe to get into questions of the president's authorities without a rather more clear understanding of what we are actually talking about. So let me answer you, in fact, in writing. I think that would be the best thing to do."
She, of course, blew him off. So, two weeks after the hearings, he sent her a letter asking how it could take so long to answer a simple question.

While he was awaiting a response, Webb did the media circuit and expressed his deep concerns about the volatile situation in the Gulf (there’s video in that link, if you care):

…if you look at where we are in the Persian Gulf right now, when I was Secretary of the Navy and until very recently, we never operated carrier — aircraft carriers inside the Persian Gulf because, number one, the turning radius is pretty close, and number two, the chance of accidentally bumping into something that would start a diplomatic situation was pretty high. We now have been doing that, and with the tensions as high as they are, I’m very worried that we might accidentally set something off in there and we need, as a Congress, to get ahead of the ballgame here.
According to The Hill, Rice finally got back to Webb, and he’s not happy with the answers she gave:
Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) said yesterday that he is not satisfied with the Bush administration’s response to his inquiries on whether the White House believes its signing statement accompanying the 2002 Iraq war authorization gives the president authority to attack Iran.

Webb first wrote to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and newly confirmed deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte last month after a Rice appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. During questioning by Webb, Rice did not clearly state whether President Bush believes he can pursue action against Iran under his 2002 signing statement, which interprets the war authorization as a broad mandate to defend “threats to national interests.”

Webb said yesterday that he has heard from Rice and Negroponte, but that their responses were “lengthy and not to the point,” adding that he intends to pursue a clarification of presidential authority to use force in Iran in the near future.
This is what the Congress is supposed to do, and was supposed to be doing for the past six years.

I must say that the junior Senator from Virginia has really grown on me in the past few months.

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, bush, webb, rice

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


Breast Flaunting for Jesus
The life of a failed California beauty pageant contestant gets even weirder.
Post by Thers. November 11, 2009.
Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Great Equivocator
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Feb 28, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rice? Not "to the point"? How could you even suggest such a thing, Senator?

Thanks, Joshua, I'd missed that.

In contrast, check out Lakoff today at Huffington Post calling a rose a rose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Webb, the single greatest victory of 06 election
Posted by: channing on Feb 28, 2007 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No neocon has any edge on this tough, plain-spoken hero of traditional US "Defense", a term unacceptably PERVERTED by neocon's to mean "Preemption", or in plain-speak, "OFFENSE".

I to this day have yet to see any constitutional foundation for "OFFENSIVE-PREEMPTION" using our DEFENSE DEPARTMENT. Congress lacks both spine and conscience here, and one very elementary principle:

How do you explain to a child that it is OK to attack his neighbor for "planning" to steel his bicycle, or jump him after school? The local police department, (common-law) won't accept hearsay, rumors or actual "plans" on a drawing-board as a basis for violently attacking a neighbor... am I wrong?

This perversion of military self-justice must be opened up if we are to get to the bottom of neocon-ideology and its devastating real-world consequences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keeps Coming Up
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 28, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The difference between Rice and Webb is one actually knows what they are talking about and the other is a well educated political hack that sold out to money a long time ago.

When I see incompetency after incompetency and outrage after outrage I think back to the arrogant chant that came from the Bush people after the Y2k selection about 'now the grownups will be in charge'. If this is grown up leadership and management, give me the kiddies back any day. Our nation has never seen such incompetence and cronyism in our modern history. In a world of ICBMs and Nukes, we simply cannot afford it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The answer is, "Yes."
Posted by: Jeanne on Feb 28, 2007 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't matter how the bush admin. dances around the wording, it's clear from their actions. Yes, they think they can make war anytime, anyplace, and for any reason they choose. The rest of us can kiss their *ss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Of course the answer is yes... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Just like everyone else...
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Feb 28, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I "LIKE" This Guy!!!

:o)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agreed
Posted by: bob t on Feb 28, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Webb is a kick-ass kind of legislator and i definitely like that about him. The WH whakos will not be able to easily shove him aside. I like Dennis Kucinich for the very same reason, he will not be pushed around by the Bushie criminals. And the same goes for Russ Feingold, I also like him for the aforementioned reason. These three guys strike me as the real thing. If Pelosi were smart she would at some point turn these three guys loose becasue they are attack dogs, unlike most Dems. And Murtha probably should be in that same group. Here in Ohio, we almost had another good guy take office, and that is Paul Hackett. In the next election the Dems must support Paul and get rid of Jean Schmidt, that piece of catholic republican scum, all of whom do nothing for america but maintain the status quo, keep the rethugs in power and do what the pope tells them to do. I am a catholic, but the popes agenda for america is the same as that of his allies that other radical right wing religion the Fundie SBC. The Catholic Fundies and the SBC Fundies should fight the Islamic Fundies and hopefully they should all destroy each other and leave the rest of us alone to make this a betterworld instead of their world of PRO-DEATH, hate and destruction as they blithely go about their wars. There is no room in this world for FUNDAMENTALISTS of any kind, and that goes for the neocons as well as the entire BUSH FAMILY and their endless OIL WARS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

frank67
Posted by: frank67 on Mar 1, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grow up boys and girls. Bush does not tolerate dissent "in the ranks," hence all the "resignations." He has surrounded himself with "Bush Bobbleheads" and Rice is a perfect example! Remember, BIA - BUSH IS an ASS! Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]