Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Science fights back

Posted by Prema Polit at 1:38 PM on February 20, 2007.


Prema Polit: Association fights willful ignorance of science; charts evolution of non-scientific thought.
48290story
48290story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

During this long weekend, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the largest general science organization in the world, held their annual conference in San Francisco. Although the focus of this conference was on climate change, they couldn't ignore the unfortunate setback in a much more established arena of science: evolution.

In a presentation at the AAAS conference, Michigan State professor Jon Miller stated that only 40 percent of people in the United States believe in evolution. God save us. No, really. We could use some divine intervention in this one. The U.S. numbers contrast to the 80 percent of people in Denmark, Iceland, and Sweden who accept evolution.

Also featured in the conference was a workshop in how to run for school board, which seems a bit odd for a science gathering, but may be key to injecting some sense into the educational system. It's one of those times where facts do need to battle with blind faith.

Now, I'm all for debate and discussion in the classroom and life in general, for challenging norms and looking at things from a different perspective. But suffice to say, what belongs in a science classroom is debate based upon scientific evidence, not faith. Creationists and proponents of "intelligent design" try to fit evidence around a belief, rather than build a theory from evidence. And that's in their most scientific moments.

But somehow evolution, so widely accepted in the scientific realm, ends up battling with faith-based ideas for space in a science curriculum. This leaves the teachers on the front lines. Nine teachers and an activist were honored with the Scientific Freedom and Responsibility Award at the AAAS conference for their fight to keep the teaching of "intelligent design" out of the classroom.

I wish that so much political force was not necessary for science to hold its ground in the realm of education. Scientists should be free to pursue new frontiers in research rather than having to scramble through political muck. In the meanwhile, however, there can't be enough scientists on school boards around this nation, so take those papers out of the lab and onto the podium for a little while at least.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I might point out...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 20, 2007 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I am no appologist for those looking for theocracy...

It should be kept in mind that it is science that brought us global warming. It is the non-scientific indigenous peoples who have lived for hundreds and/or thousands of years in balance with nature. It is science that brought us industrialism.. which is part of what is now destroying indigenous peoples and stealing their lands to exploit them for gold, timber,oil, and land for livestock.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I might point out... Posted by: aerdrie
» Furthermore... Posted by: andyc
» RE: I might point out... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: I might point out... Posted by: David Wick
» RE: I might point out... Posted by: Ian MacLeod
If you want to "blame" science for something, try OVERPOPULATION.
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Feb 20, 2007 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the most part, indigenous people didn't overbreed because they couldn't.

Then science dramatically reduced deathrates without equally reducing birthrates.

This is so basic, our descendents in their Malthusian nightmare will curse us for our willful ignorance of it. Continue to disregard overpopulation if you must, but kindly stop yapping about its inevitable consequences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Interestingly enough... Posted by: aerdrie
» Sharpen up the guillotines? Posted by: lessbread
Caveat
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 20, 2007 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Define Evolution
1- The General Concept (evolutionary thought)
2- The Law of Natural Selection & Theory of the Origin of the Species (Darwin's Posit)
3- Some other specific Theory or collection of related theories.

Saying evolution is like saying cereal, soda, etc. Lots and lots of flavors...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Caveat Posted by: lessbread
My new favorite website
Posted by: fanny666 on Feb 20, 2007 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Earth Is Not Moving!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]