Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Healthy Crisco?

Posted by Heather Gehlert at 4:32 PM on February 16, 2007.


Heather Gehlert: Good news for synthetic lard lovers...
48146teaser
48146Teaser

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Smuckers, the manufacturer of Crisco, announced last month that it will be eliminating nearly all trans fat from its shortening.

According to an article in Consumer Reports, each 1-tablespoon serving of Crisco shortening "will contain less than 0.5 grams of trans fat, instead of its original 1.5 grams."

This is big news considering Crisco pioneered the development of industrially created trans fat. Although some trans fat occurs naturally (in cow milk, for example), most of today's trans fats are the byproduct of partially hydrogenating plant oils -- a process that, according to Wikipedia, was developed in the early 20th century and became commercialized in 1911 with the introduction of Crisco.

Before they became linked to coronary heart disease, partially hydrogenated oils were wildly popular because they are handy for baking and can help increase a product's shelf life.

The Consumer Reports article states that the new Crisco is still just as effective for baking and tastes pretty much the same:

To see just how well the new shortening stacked up against the older one, Consumer Reports' testers baked two blueberry pies, using both formulations. Crumb for crumb, they found the two desserts to be practically interchangeable: Both formulations produced crusts that were flaky, had a mild flavor, and were relatively easy to work with.

But, trans fat or not, the reformulated Crisco is not exactly healthy. Each serving still contains 3 grams of saturated fat.

And Crisco's new labels may be misleading to consumers. Although the reformulated Crisco still has small amounts of artery-clogging trans fat, the company can now claim zero grams of trans fat on its product labels because the FDA only requires manufacturers to disclose trans fat if the amount exceeds 0.5 grams per serving.

Digg!

Tagged as: trans fat, crisco, shortening, baking, trans fatty acids

Heather Gehlert is a managing editor at AlterNet.


Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch
They're all inter-related, you know.
Post by General JC Christian. July 9, 2009.
After Casting Sole No Vote on Slavery Memorial, Rep. King Keeps Digging Deeper
This is one contorted excuse.
Post by Steve Benen. July 9, 2009.
Airing of Grievances: Right-Winger Incensed over 'Commie's' Jab at 'Saturday Night Fever'
Oh, and Pinochet was a good guy, damnit!
Post by Roy Edroso. July 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Oh my noes!!!! Crisco not healthy?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 16, 2007 8:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, trans fat or not, the reformulated Crisco is not exactly healthy. Each serving still contains 3 grams of saturated fat.

Great Scott! Next thing you know, they'll start printing warnings about cancer on cigarette labels! Surely, the public must be informed that a tub of lard might not be...healthy! We need advocates!

Call out the celebrities!

And, of course the lawyers; somebody needs to hit the litigation lottery, and it might as well be me (for the social good, no doubt).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Making stuff up? Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Making stuff up? Posted by: hartsmart
» RE: Making stuff up? Posted by: lessbread
Well at least it is a little better
Posted by: Kate Anne on Feb 18, 2007 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the plus side it contains less trans fat, handles pretty well, and makes a tasty crust. On the negative side, the reason it has less trans fat is that the trans fat is chemically processed, according to Body & Soul, and it contains cotton seed oil which is highly sprayed with pesticides. You can't win - but perhaps you/we can settle for a little bit healthier while still maintaining a pretty good taste. Moderation is key.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]