Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Afro-Netizen
All Spin Zone
Altercation
Americablog
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Another Iranian Online
August J. Pollak
Baghdad Burning
Barry Lando
Bloggrrrlz Gallery
Blondesense
Bob Geiger
Body and Soul
Boing Boing
Booman Tribune
BOP News
Bush Watch
BUZZFLASH
Carpetbagger
Clean Air Blog
Cool Hunting
Corrente
CrooksandLiars
Cursor
Dahr Jamail
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
DC Media Girl
DemiOrator
Direland
Echidne of the Snakes
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton
Fact-esque
Falafel Sex, and Other Things Best Left Unsaid
Farai Chideya
Feminist Peace Network
Feministe
Feministing
Frameshop
Gristmill
Huffington Post
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
James Wolcott
Jesus General
Lady Jayne's Blog
Liberal Oasis
Mad Kane
Mahablog
Majikthise
Media Girl
Media is a Plural
MediaCitizen
Metafilter
Michael Berube
MyDD
News Dissector
News For Real
Norbizness
Oliver Willis
Pacific Views
Pandagon
Political Animal
PopPolitics.com
PR Watch
Prometheus 6
Raed in the Middle
RH Reality Check
Robert Greenwald
Roger Ailes
Rox Populi
Sadly, No!
Seeing the Forest
Shakespeares Sister
Sirotablog
Sisyphus Shrugged
skippy the bush kangaroo
Slacktivist
SpeakSpeak
Stay Free!
Steve Gilliard
Talking Points Memo
TalkLeft
TBogg
Thatcoloredfellasweblog
The Bilerico Project
The Hutchinson Political Report
The Republic of T
The Revealer
The Sideshow
The Swift Report
Think Progress
This Modern World
TikvahGirl
Trish Wilson
War and Piece
Waveflux
What She Said!
Whiskey Bar
Working Families Vote 2008
David Brooks' myth-world
New York Times columnist David Brooks drives me nuts on a regular basis. His latest column is par for the course.
Brooks hails conservative Democrats and dismisses the middle-class squeeze as a myth, "detached from the reality most Americans experience." This was particularly interesting to learn as we just finished putting together a DMI overview of the middle class squeeze grounded in that very reality. With the overwhelming majority of Americans agreeing that as a nation we're working "as hard or harder than ever just to get by" and less than a third of voters saying that they personally are getting ahead financially, one wonders who it is that's out of touch.
Economist Jared Bernstein of the Economic Policy Institute makes the point excellently in this letter to the editor:
To the Editor:
In "Who's Afraid of the New Economy?" David Brooks and the analysts he cites use rose-colored glasses and tortured data to dismiss pressing concerns facing the middle class.
They want us to take solace in the fact that the income of the typical prime-age household is in the $60,000 range, but don't mention that this income has fallen 4.4 percent, about $3,000, since 2000.
To these analysts, globalization is not a problem because unemployment is low. Never mind the job quality hit taken by millions of workers who've moved from manufacturing to low-end services.
These analysts similarly dismiss inequality concerns caused by the profit squeeze on wages. Yet corporate profits as a share of income are at a 56-year high, while the real earnings of even college graduates are up only marginally since 2000.
The administration made these arguments before the midterm elections. They were rejected by voters for whom the middle-class squeeze is a reality that can't be explained away by political spin.
Jared BernsteinBut I still have one more beef with this latest Brooks column. Brooks remarks that "the main reason incomes have become more volatile over the past decades is motherhood… as women play a more signficant role in the economy, their movements in and out of the labor force to care for children increase volatility." It's true that having a baby is the leading cause of poverty spells in the U.S., that working mothers are paid less than childless women for the same work, and that married couples with children are twice as likely as childless couples to file for bankruptcy. So what's the upshot, Mr. Brooks: do we fight for paid family leave? Universal pre-school? Health care for all kids? An end to wage discrimination against mothers?
Washington, Feb. 12, 2007
The writer is a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute
Tagged as: economy, new york times, david brooks, middle class
Amy Traub is the Associate Director of Research at the Drum Major Institute.
| Also in PEEK | |||
| Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense" You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads. Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009. |
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America. Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009. |
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill. Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009. |
|