Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Porno popup case makes national news

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein at 11:07 AM on February 14, 2007.


The Associated Press and the New York Times pick up the Julie Amero story.
8396672f9f10f62cbo
Popups

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

On January 19, AlterNet brought you the story of Julie Amero, a substitute teacher from Norwich, Connecticut who faces up to 40 years in jail because a malware-infested PC in her classroom spewed pornographic popups at her 7th grade language arts class.

Defense experts who analyzed the hard drive found that the computer had been automatically redirected to the pornographic websites because a user had inadvertently downloaded a piece of malicious software from an innocent hairdressing site. Because of a variety of procedural missteps the jury never heard the evidence that exculpated Amero.

The computer itself was completely unprotected from obscene material because IT staffers let the content filter lapse. Yet it was Amero who was criminally charged with potentially endangering the morals of minors, even though she did her best to shield the kids from the monitor.

I'm happy to say that both Alison Leigh Cowan of the New York Times and John Christoffersen of the Associated Press wrote fair and informative articles about the Amero case.

One hopes that this egregious miscarriage of justice will be reversed on appeal. Julie Amero should not be the scapegoat for lax cybersecurity and anti-porn paranoia.

[Photo by Iggy]

Digg!

Tagged as: porn, julie amero, malware, computer, norwich, popup

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch
They're all inter-related, you know.
Post by General JC Christian. July 9, 2009.
After Casting Sole No Vote on Slavery Memorial, Rep. King Keeps Digging Deeper
This is one contorted excuse.
Post by Steve Benen. July 9, 2009.
Airing of Grievances: Right-Winger Incensed over 'Commie's' Jab at 'Saturday Night Fever'
Oh, and Pinochet was a good guy, damnit!
Post by Roy Edroso. July 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Glad this is getting more attention
Posted by: Techubus on Feb 14, 2007 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more the better, this decision has to be reversed. This teacher not only deserves her life back, she deserves major compensation for being put through this sham.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Witch Hunt
Posted by: kww355 on Feb 15, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was an egregious miscarriage of justice, a total witch hunt. Who among us hasn't had this happen at one time, particularly before we had filters and pop-up blockers ?

When she wins her appeal ( which she surely must ), I hope she sues the school board for their back teeth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If the US.........
Posted by: tap17x on Feb 15, 2007 11:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..........were not so hypocritically terrified of sex while really totally obsessed with it, something like this could not happen. Can you imagine it going on in Europe? Recall the Janet Jackson one-second bare tit episode. I can't believe that anyone would give a flying femtofuck about something so meaningless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]