Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Religious Left backs John Edwards, bloggers

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 10:25 AM on February 9, 2007.


The actual religious left pleased that he didn't "cave in to the mindless bullying"

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

I'm aware that the title of this post contradicts Politico's coverage of the flap over John Edwards' blogger-hires, which reads: "Edwards Blogger Flap Discomforts Religious Left." (Background on flap is HERE and HERE).

To support his assertion, Politico's Ben Smith cites a blog post from a lay Catholic Lawyer on a liberal site, "private conversations," the chair of the "National Democratic Ethnic Leadership Council" (wha?), and finally, waaaaaay down toward the bottom, a "careful" statement from the "Catholic Alliance," actually affirming Edwards' sentiments and decision.

It should be said that Smith's link to Melissa McEwan's blog actually sends you to a post teasing the religious right out from the religious left, connecting with the concerns and confusion that many experience over the diverse nature of American religious groups...

Smith also notes that Edwards' wife sits on the board of Call to Renewal, though that's largely a protestant evangelical group, with some Roman Catholic members.

Melinda Henneberger, in a post on The Huffington Post uses the aforementioned post from the Catholic lawyer to conclude that this incident may "risk the Catholic vote."

Whether one agrees with Marcotte's and McEwan's statements or not, whether one is offended or not, is not so much the issue. The issue is whether a hit-piece from a bigoted partisan on low-level employees is going to drive the public discussion -- and whether it's going to do so without context.

To say that you don't respect Donohue but that he may have a point here is to miss the point. To draw conclusions from individuals who don't represent organizations and to neglect both the provenance of a charge and its motivations is equally irresponsible.

In an effort to get closer to what "the religious left" -- those whose political work has been driven by their religious belief, and who've been at it for a while -- really think about this incident, I made some calls.

The first person I reached was Frances Kissling, president of Catholics for a Free Choice and a leading light in the religious left since before there was such a thing as "the religious left." She was well aware of the incident as she'd penned a letter to the Times (which they declined to publish... printed below) and she was overflowing with commentary on the hype.

She told me that Donohue was a "despicable" character and was deeply troubled that the New York Times found any charge emanating from Donohue and his Catholic League worthy of an article: "It's clearly a political hit from someone who opposes Edwards."

*Special thanks to Tim Simpson at the Christian Alliance for Progress.

Digg!

Tagged as: election08, bloggers, edwards, donohue, kissling, religious left

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Catholic League Represents Only Conservative Catholic Minority
Posted by: thirdmg on Feb 10, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Roman Catholics comprise the largest denomination in America. If Donohue and his Catholic League could speak for them, he would become a political broker far more powerful than any of the other leaders of the religious right, such as James Dobson.

Unfortunately for Donohue, since Vatican II most American Catholics have become independent-minded and liberal on various social issues. That infuriates the conservative minority in the Church, which rejects all dissent from the official Vatican party line on social issues. It's that highly vocal minority which he represents.

For that reason, Donohue's statements often require translation. When he attacks critics of the Church as "anti-Catholics," he's not referring to the traditional and historical sources of anti-Catholicism in the U.S. (Ironically, he often forms political alliances with them.)

The real focus of his fury is liberals, especially liberal Catholics, whom he doesn't consider to be real Catholics. In his mindset, only the conservatives are Catholics, only they speak for the Church, and anyone who disagrees is branded as an anti-Catholic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If You Want to Know What Mainstream Catholics Think...
Posted by: williamsb on Feb 10, 2007 10:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to know what mainstream Catholics think, you should not turn to Bill Donohue. He represents a fringe, radically-partisan group with no connection to Catholicsm. But neither can you turn to Frances Kissling. She dissents from Catholic faith so much that it is hard to even recognize her as Catholic.

It has yet to be determined how the majority of authentic Catholics will finally settle on this question. As a normal Catholic, myself, I hope the majority recognizes this gratuitous and malicious attack on Senator Edwards as what it is... a malicious attack on Senator Edwards.

I would also hope, though, that people stop turning to those on the extreme fringe to seek out positions in response to those on the opposite extreme fringe when addressing issues involving the Catholic community. In doing so, you feed into the nonsense the radical right wants you to feed into and needlessly fan flames. You also disrespect the majority of Catholics who, despite what those on the far left or far right seem to think, do have minds and can think through issues and hold intelligent opinions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]