Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Calls for Propaganda Surge...

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 6:06 AM on February 9, 2007.


Tim Karr: Slashes PBS

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This guest post comes from Tim Karr.

The latest twist of Bush's budgetary knife lays bare the White House's information priority: Fake news trumps real reporting.

George W. Bush is trying—yet again—to smother NPR, PBS and other public broadcasting while at the same forcing an escalation (sorry "surge') in funding for propaganda.

The president's proposed fiscal year 2008 budget for "U.S. international broadcasting" calls for an overall increase of 3.8% from the last year's recommendation.

All told the budget calls for $668.2 million for the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), the federal agency that supervises all US government non-military propaganda.

Slash and Burn

At the same time Bush's budget proposes steep cuts to federal funds for public broadcasting by nearly 25%. According to the Association of Public Television Stations, the Bush budget would cut up to $145 million from the $460 million proposed FY 2008 budget for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting.

The amount allocated to the BBG is a 3.8 percent increase from the agency's 2007 budget with monies specifically "targeted to the war on terror." These tax dollars would flow to government mouthpieces including the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, Alhurra, Radio Free Asia, and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting.

According to a BBG release: "The budget also fully funds initiatives … to critical Muslim audiences. These include the expansion of VOA television to Iran to a 12 hour stream, VOA Pashto radio programming to the Afghanistan/Pakistan border region, television programs to Afghanistan and Pakistan and Alhurra Europe, the 24/7 service to Arabic speakers in Europe."

Taxpayer money well spent?

Measure the overwhelming public support for funding of public broadcasting against their growing dissatisfaction with the war effort. According to a 2005 Roper poll, 82% of Americans believe that taxpayer funding given to PBS is "money well spent". A recent AP-Ipsos poll counts 62% of Americans who now think that going to war in Iraq was a mistake.

Bush proposed cuts to public broadcasting will have "Sesame Street" and other ad-free kids' shows are under the knife. So is the watchdog journalism, critical voices and diverse fare that PBS, NPR and other public media offer. The cuts continue the partisan war on journalism once led by the ex-chair of public broadcasting, Ken Tomlinson (remember him).

It's now up to Congress to set the budget right and restore funding to media that more accurately represents the public's priorities. You can help.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, media, pbs

Timothy Karr is the campaign director of Free Press. He blogs at MediaCitizen.


Laura Flanders: Vanity Fair's Retort to the New Yorker's Obama Cover Misses the Mark
If Vanity Fair wanted to flip the New Yorker cover on the GOP, they'd have to portray the media's lies about the candidate. Not the true stuff.
Post by Laura Flanders. July 24, 2008.
Air Force Brass Get "Comfort Capsules" on Taxpayer's Dime
A new report finds the Air Force is spending counterterrorism funds on luxury in-flight seating for military and civilian leaders.
Post by Liliana Segura. July 24, 2008.
The Power of Panties For Peace
"Some might say, 'it can't happen here,' but I'm here to warn you that it can. A fifth column of pantie warriors has arisen in the netroots."
Post by General JC Christian. July 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Is that why PBS interviewer Juan Williams
Posted by: Ellie1 on Feb 9, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
kissed Bush's butt in an interview?

And can the new Democratic congress stop this dictator of a president?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PBS--an oasis in the desert
Posted by: zooeyhall on Feb 9, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Documentary producer Ken Burns says that PBS is "an oasis in the desert" of current mainstream television. I cannot agree more. PBS is virtually the only tv I watch anymore. Flipping through the channels of commercial tv leaves the discriminating viewer aghast: bizaare "reality" programs, gratuitous violent cop shows, inane and fluff network news "programs". The list just goes on and on.

Commercial tv has become simply a means to dumb down the average citizen by offering mind candy and propaganda. PBS stands in sharp contrast to this. And that is why the ruling class oligarchy and their Republican lap dogs have always throughly hated it. The shit brain that is produced in the person who watches commercial tv regularly is exactly the kind of citizen the oligarchy wants in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wonder what her new friends think?!?!
Posted by: voodude on Feb 9, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE DECIDER STRIKES AGAIN
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 9, 2007 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder he can't get a handle on Iraq. He's busy finding ways to contol the normal flow of information. PBS fills a need for alot of us. FOX is not for everyone. Fact is, one way or another people have a way of finding out what's going on. With or without approval. Not everybody loves the bloggers. But it works. That's what matters. Thank,s ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THE DECIDER STRIKES AGAIN Posted by: Herbert Levinson
People are starving and have no health care and yet
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Feb 9, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we fund elitist television programming (by definition since if it was popular than people would pay, through commercials, to view it.) I'm somewhat torn because I like art, museums, and good programming but, on the other hand, I also question how many rich, elite types fund museums and art galleries (and the government funds these also) while so many people -even in the USA- are homeless, addicted, starving, and ill. Do we have our priorities straight here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ducational does not equal elitist Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Just more and more lying
Posted by: ng1944 on Feb 9, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like cornered snake Bush spitting more and more venom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PBS- A Troubled Oasis
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 9, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to give Dubya and his cronies a nice swift kick for messing with the budget, management and content at NPR and PBS, but they could do more.

Independent Lens, POV, AIR, Now, & Frontline are all doing wonderful work on a shoestring budget compared to commercial broadcasters, but the PBS schedule has become too full of 'me too' content at the expense of the kind of public affairs, educational and cultural programming only PBS seems to be capable of. In a world of HGTV and other lifestyle channels, do PBS stations need to waste budget and airtime on a digital channel (APT's Create) full of cooking, gardening and DIY shows? Is that the best use of the budget they get from donors, underwriters and taxpayers? I say no.

On the daily news department, the NewsHour has become more and more establishment each and every year. They let too many pundits and bought-and-paid-for experts get away with murder. The record of coverage during the run-up to the Iraq invasion was not much different than that of the commercial networks. The tone and depth was greater, but the viewpoints expressed and invited were strictly beltway Washington think tanks, consultants and pundits. Remote interviews from the more than 300 PBS member stations with voices outside the beltway wouldn't break the bank and would bring great diversity to the coverage.

Rather than become more like commercial broadcasters, Public TV needs to keep it's distinctive voice, place and dedication to service. Maybe they should conduct a huge capital campaign and endow a trust fund dedicated to financing News & Public Affairs Programming free from outside influence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Radio and Television
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Feb 13, 2007 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have been water carriers for George Bush and the publican party throughout. If they choose to be ankle grabbbers rather than journalist, then I don't much care if they lose funding. They no longer serve the public anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]