Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Important care options for disabled being ignored

Posted by Prema Polit at 3:54 PM on January 30, 2007.


Prema Polit: Community services for the developmentally disabled do need help, but outdated institutions are not the solution.
47390teaser

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Suzanne Braun Levine SuzanneBraunLevine.com

Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
Amanda Think Progress

Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Steve Benen Washington Monthly

Recently the Oakland Tribune ran an article by Michele Marcucci that rehashes the squabble about closing state institutions for people with developmental disabilities and wrongly implies that these large, outdated institutions can offer the essentials of care that only community services can give. Both community homes and large institutions are capable of caring for the medical and physical needs of residents, but only in the community setting can people with disabilities experience all that life has to offer.

"It's a battle that has been brewing for decades: community care versus institutional care," Marcucci writes.

True enough. But it's the wrong battle. The more energy, time and money that both sides of this fight expend on trying to win it, the less is devoted to the real needs of people with developmental disabilities.

My older brother is severely mentally retarded and has behavioral problems. When he was thirteen and becoming increasingly unmanageable, my parents despaired over how they would continue to care for him. Their case manager told them that if they could not continue to care for him at home, their only choice was a developmental center, a large state institution. But they had heard of an after-school program that he could attend, which would give them some precious hours for work and taking care of their two young daughters. They decided that they could keep him at home. Many families did not have that choice in the eighties.

Though growing up with my brother was not easy, I am grateful that my parents managed to keep him out of an institution. When I visited the Sonoma Developmental Center eight years ago and imagined him confined within those walls, I finally understood the great contrast between institution life and the life that my brother has been able to have.

He now attends a day program for adults with developmental disabilities. He is in a small group that travels around in a van and does activities ranging from exploring a park to learning work skills. My brother meets all sorts of people, he discovers new places and he indulges his love of music and airplanes.

Institutions in their basic nature limit the life experiences and choices of people with disabilities. Often, even very medically fragile and/or profoundly mentally retarded people can live fully, make personal connections to other human beings, and benefit from the diverse experiences that living in the community offers.

Now, providing services in the community is the general rule, and these services have been growing and improving. Yet some family members of people with developmental disabilities and workers in the developmental centers are clinging to a system that has no future -- nor should it.

Most developmental centers are in need of major, pricey repairs, and they cost more than community services in the first place. Although only 1.2 percent of Californians with developmental disabilities live in developmental centers, 17 percent of the state developmental services budget goes to developmental centers.

The longer people misguidedly try to preserve the existence of these institutions and oppose moving residents out, the longer community services will suffer for lack of funds and trained staff. The care providers are paid woefully little (they aren't unionized), which makes it impossible to retain staff over long periods of time. Because of lack of funds, workers may not be properly trained, and if there is constant worker turnover, few people may know the clients or what is going on at all.

The sad story in the Oakland Tribune of the death of Donald Santiago may have been a part of these issues. But note that buried at the end of the article is something important: "Burton said that over the last 19 months -- roughly the time Santiago lived at Justin's Home -- five of the 64 clients his agency served at Agnews died of pneumonia." People with disabilities often die of pneumonia, whether in institutions or the community -- this is not news.

A proposal: Instead of spending all this energy on fighting to keep people in institutions, spend it on working with the regional center to create a quality place and program specifically tailored to a person's needs and personality. Help provide a more fulfilling life than one could ever find behind the walls of an institution.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Indeed
Posted by: Lara on Jan 30, 2007 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wholeheartedly agree that community organizations serving the disabled need better funding and more support from the communities in which they reside. Additionally, if more people were aware of the different options available to them, they might not feel the need to turn to such barbarous practices as "Ashely's Treatment." The more communties become involved in the care of, and the more they become aware of people with disabilities within their communities, the more money and support these agencies and organizations would likely receive.

Thanks for writing a great response!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The support system needs support
Posted by: asilsfable on Jan 30, 2007 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a friend who is the district manager for the Los Angeles chapter of Easter Seals and the stories she tells are mind blowing. Not only of the "clients" she deals with and cares for but what the staff has to do and how unbelieveably little they are paid.

I agree on the author's point of disportionate funding to the institutions as opposed to support facilities. A new culture of inclusivity with regard to developmental disabilities needs to be nurtured. Throwing people away in institutions (whether they are prisons, mental institutions, etc.) is not the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stanley S
Posted by: issje on Jan 31, 2007 2:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RE: "But it's the wrong battle. The more energy, time and money that both sides of this fight expend on trying to win it, the less is devoted to the real needs of people with developmental disabilities…A proposal: Instead of spending all this energy on fighting to keep people in institutions, spend it on working with the regional center to create a quality place and program specifically tailored to a person's needs and personality"

And sadly for decades community and developmental center (DC) advocates have fought this wrong battle…there are more than enough horror stories of abuse and even murder in the DCs and the community to go around…the pot has called the kettle black while citizens with disABILITIES have, at best, led lives of benign neglect…see 2006 Inside Bay Area Broken Home articles and 1998 San Francisco Chronicle articles for proof…not much has changed from 1998 to 2006

The sad irony is for decades there has been a law…the Lanterman Act…that mandates exactly what the proposal suggests…i.e., create a quality place and program specifically tailored to a person’s needs.

The Lanterman Act (AKA the Bill of rights for those w/ disABILITIES) says: an interdisciplinary team (including the indiviual and family) shall develop an individual program plan (IPP); regional centers shall find cost effective programs that meet the needs and goals in the plan; and the state shall fund the programs.

If the IPP determines a DC is the choice of the individual then so be it…in reality if IPPs were followed, DCs would cease to exist…for DCs cannot meet the needs of our citizens…few would choose DCs...i.e.,

"Institutions in their basic nature limit the life experiences and choices of people with disabilities. Often, even very medically fragile and/or profoundly mentally retarded people can live fully, make personal connections to other human beings, and benefit from the diverse experiences that living in the community offers."

Why has the State and responsible administrative agencies not obeyed the law...Lanterman...for all these years…too simple maybe...but;

why not KISS...so much bs and fighting the wrong battles…so much time wasted building a bureaucracy that serves it self vice those it has a sacred duty to serve.

Advocates time and energies should be spent fixing the Broken Homes…insuring quality in the community and the DCs…demanding accountability for positive outcomes…demanding the Lanterman mandates be enforced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The next chapter
Posted by: pes37262 on Jan 31, 2007 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“A proposal: Instead of spending all this energy on fighting to keep people in institutions, spend it on working with the regional center to create a quality place and program specifically tailored to a person's needs and personality. Help provide a more fulfilling life than one could ever find behind the walls of an institution.”
Important care options for disabled being ignored
Posted by Prema Polit on January 30, 2007 at 3:54 PM.


A value – in a paragraph.

This is well said, and central to improving the lives of people with disabilities. Is it as simple as a paragraph?

Not as long as some, but longer than many, I have observer California’s developmental services from what can be called an outsider’s perspective. I am not a family member, provider, or consumer. I do not work for the state, a Regional Center, nor am I a member of an advocacy group. Unfortunately, from my perspective, I have rarely, and perhaps never found the first paragraph to be a true value of any advocate, notwithstanding the many claims to the contrary.

I am disturbed by the proclivity of people, in response to such loss of life, to state the obvious:

"People with disabilities often die of pneumonia, whether in institutions or the community -- this is not news."

Of course it is not news. At issue is whether death, by pneumonia or other, could have reasonably been prevented by the absence of obvious, or not so obvious – negligence. This ‘should’ be the central issue. It should be the central question, regardless of where a person with disabilities lives.

“The state health department is investigating the […] in the wake of Santiago's death, and […] the regional center has deployed staff to the home and launched an independent investigation…”

If investigations show negligence on the part of Justin’s Home or the Regional Center will advocates demand proportional accountability or action? If investigations show that Justin received good care and did nothing to contribute to his death will advocates morn with the understanding hat Justin was fortunate by being able to spend the last year and ½ of his relative freedom. Advocates that truly hold the value and desire to, “Help provide a more fulfilling life than one could ever find behind the walls of an institution.” must on both accounts – most will not.

What ‘advocate’ or blogger will follow this story to the pragmatic end (id est, will we hear the second chapter of this story? Will we hear the results and conclusions of the investigations and reviews?)? The end that tries to answer the pivotal questions that are of first magnitude to people with disabilities?

What ‘advocate’ or blogger, absent blaring irregularities and bias, is willing to accept the facts and final reports before they are presented? What ‘advocate’ or blogger will first wait to see what a report says and judge it, not on its merits, but by deciding if it works with their particular reality, or promotes the political cause of “them and theirs?” or raises their personal ship?

I mean not to throw fuel upon the fire. On the contrary, I stand between the two sides, point my crooked nose and beady eyes at both.

If nobody truly steps up and truly holds the value to, “create a quality place and program specifically tailored to a person's needs and personality.” Then nothing will change. To, “create a quality place” we must recognize, celebrate, and try to emulate success, and we MUST recognize, admit, remember, and try to find a way to avoid the failures. Both of these qualities must be part of our formula. If they are not, then we are not part of the solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]