Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Chuck Hagel: 'Bush tried to get authorization to attack half the planet'

Posted by Joshua Holland at 1:01 PM on January 24, 2007.


Joshua Holland: Why is this a block-buster revelation? Anyone? Bueller?
war
war

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

ThinkProgress has this story today …

The Bush administration has taken a series of steps in recent weeks that appear to be setting the stage for a military confrontation with Iran. Congressional leaders have been raising red flags. "I'd like to be clear," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said last week. "The president does not have the authority to launch military action in Iran without first seeking congressional authorization." Recent comments made by Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) explain why Congress's resistance is so vital.

In an interview in GQ Magazine, Hagel reveals that the Bush administration tried to get Congress to approve military action anywhere in the Middle East -- not just in Iraq -- in the fall of 2002. At the time, Hagel says, the Bush administration presented Congress with a resolution that would have authorized the use of force anywhere in the region:

HAGEL: [F]inally, begrudgingly, [the White House] sent over a resolution for Congress to approve. Well, it was astounding. It said they could go anywhere in the region.

GQ: It wasn't specific to Iraq?

HAGEL: Oh no. It said the whole region! They could go into Greece or anywhere. Is central Asia in the region? I suppose! Sure as hell it was clear they meant the whole Middle East. It was anything. It was literally anything. No boundaries. No restrictions.

GQ: They expected Congress to let them start a war anywhere in the Middle East?

HAGEL: Yes. Yes. Wide open. We had to rewrite it. Joe Biden, Dick Lugar, and I stripped the language that the White House had set up and put our language in it.

Asked about his vote in support of the final Iraq war resolution, Hagel told GQ, "Do I regret that vote? Yes, I do regret that vote."

Some of the blogs are calling this a "bombshell' revelation, but for the life of me I can't really understand why. It's long been clear that the administration is full of people who embrace the plainly delusional idea that there really is a "War on Terror" -- that we face a coordinated international Islamic Jihad. Fortunately, that's not the case (although on our current path we're making the emrgence of such a movement more likely).

The point is: if you think you're fighting a "Clash of Civilizations" against some massive nihilist conspiracy that exists throughout a given region, why wouldn't you seek authority to attack "them" wherever you find them? Given what we know of the Bush administration, the only surprising thing about this story is that they asked Congress for permission, even if they did so "begrudgingly."

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, war on terror, hagel

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Obama Rolls Out Blair, Panetta; Vows 'No Exceptions' to US Values
"We must adhere to our values diligently and with no exceptions." --Barack Obama
Post by Spencer Ackerman. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's New To Me but Now Makes Sense
Posted by: bob t on Jan 24, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Hagel is a rethuglikkkan. He must really want to be the next prez. Hagel, Lugar, Grassely and Hatch are the worst of the northenr rethugs, but what he now tells us makes sense because it fits.

The world may end in 2012 or 2013 as the rapturist end timrers desire or if Mr. Boosh continues on for another two years it may end sooner as the entire Middle East descends into war, most likel a nuclear war created by Booosh or his warhawk friends in the Israeli gov't and clearly against the wishes of the Israeli people. Their gov't doesn't listen to them and our gov't of rethugs and catholics doesn't listen to us.

I am a catholic but I hate what my church and this gov't is doing to america and the entire world.

What is amazing is that bin Laden, China and Russia don't have to do a thing but just sit back and watch as America is destroyed from within by the rethug supporters of Big Religion, Big Corps and Big Neocons.

It seems that 'we the people' are totally helpless to stop them. Must 'we the people' resort to violence, it's beginning to look like that. After that statement the FBI will come a knockin' like they just did to that 81yr old man in Pa.

I don't dislike the FBI, CIA or NSA. But they work for Bush, Cheney, Gonzales and the rethugs, not 'we the people' of America who are trying to 'form a more perfect union'.

The enemies of America are very much within and at this point in time appear to be unstoppable. 'We the people' have been asleep since Reagan and Pope John Paul II and the rethugs have come to power in America.

Hey John Paul and the catholics are agents of a foreign power and don't they have to register as such.

I despise what my church is doing to my beloved America. I demand that they be thrown out of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's New To Me but Now Makes Sense Posted by: famouspipeliner
This is what's great about AlterNet...
Posted by: eddie torres on Jan 24, 2007 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The writers trawl the bloggers, the bloggers trawl the mainstream, AlterNet readers get two layers of protection (condoms and the pill) against Madison Ave's sociopathic 'prototype man' (GQ) and 'prototype woman' (Ms.) propaganda, while everyone still gets a glimpse of Chuck Hagel's jewels.

There should be an idyllic retirement haven for AlterNet writers/contributors somewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These people are seriously delusional
Posted by: badkitty on Jan 24, 2007 3:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, after reading the transcript of Wolf Blitzer's interview with Cheney, and then this, delusional is the only word that accurately describes Dick Cheney, and poor George Bush, who can't do anything without him. I'm not religious, but I pray that the Scooter Libby trial forces Cheney to resign (I don't know how, he'll never admit to anything) and Bush has to be forced to appoint someone like Kerry as VP (NOT Lieberman!) (that's why I use the word "force"). Hagel will not be acceptable, if it's in the back of his mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't chuck hagel the owner of diebold voting machines?
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Jan 24, 2007 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like Hagel is straddlin' the fence. Things are warming up a bit so he's moving toward the middle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"...a "bombshell' revelation...I can't really understand why..."
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 25, 2007 3:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nor can I, since it is the Bush M.O. to ask for the moon and settle for dominating the Earth.

And the last six years of GOP legislative control has consistently given Bush more than he really wanted and, as has now proved to be the case, more than he could handle.

I guess it's the payoff of political ruthlessness: be careful what you demand because you may get it. Bush has been in over his numbskull head from day 1, and taken us into the muck along with him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't you mean CHENEY?
Posted by: pubradiocat on Jan 25, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First we have to stop giving George Bush the credit (or discredit) for proposing and executing a war on the Middle East, as it should be clear by now that he is a bubble-headed stooge for Cheney and the Neocons.

THEY are the ideologues; Bush is a facilitator. That doesn't absolve him war crimes and impeachable offenses against the American government and its people. But we should be honest and place blame squarely on the real perpetrators, then go after them with all the legal force available in our constitution.

Cheney and company are the most dangerous, reckless criminals ever to run American government. It used to be that governmental corruption merely bankrupted the treasury or caused political paralysis; now we have a group who are singlehandedly taking America down, causing us to lose Superpower status, while calling the REST of us unpatriotic and unAmerican.

So many of us are enraged by Cheney's actions, but feel helpless to do anything about it. We are turning into a country whose morals and values have been so corrupted by this crew, and whose constitution is now so irrevocably damaged (along with our reputation in the world) that it seems the old rules don't apply anymore. Can Cheney/Bush be removed from government forcefully if Americans decide we've finally had enough of being pushed into harm's way?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did anyone watch
Posted by: NamVeT on Jan 25, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cheney's face during georgie halibush's speech? The smirk never left his face. I, along with the most of the country still don't understand how (or why) we let this criminal bullshit to go on. I fear that we have REALLY LOST our country to these back stabbing bastards. I was halfway surprised not to hear georgie say something like "As I speak, our great Air Force is dropping nukes on Iran. I now have to declare a state of martial law to protect and preserve our people and country" This administration in total should be locked up for the rest of their worthless lives! It's indeed a say day in OUR BELOVED COUNTRY! Prepare for the worst and be sure your "papers" are in order....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Survival
Posted by: ccluelessfl60 on Jan 25, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After watching Cheney say on CNN that nothing will stop them from the War it begs the question "Whose damn country is this? I said before that the only way to stop Bush and Cheney is impeachment, Dick just made my case. The law of the land the will of the people means nothing to either of them. They really believe they can do as they please and it is about time we let them know what can be done if we have the will to do it. Hopefully Dick will be charged with obstruction of justice when he refuses to answer Fitzpatrick's questions.That would be a start. They believe we are too scared to go after them, when we should let them see what true fear is like. Like the Titanic, the unsinkable ship, they too can go down with few survivors. It may be a long bloody battle in the halls of Congress but if we survived these pass 6 years we can survive anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

e s and s machines
Posted by: dkbpeace on Jan 25, 2007 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hagel bought the e s and s voting machines then proceeding to "win" the election. An Ohioan owns diebold, which reflects why our votes were NOT counted accurately in the 2004 and 2006 elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]