Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Mercenary firm sues families of murdered employees*

Posted by Joshua Holland at 11:06 AM on January 20, 2007.


Joshua Holland: From the 'Have they no shame?' department …
blackwater

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The reverberations from those four Blackwater mercenaries brutally killed in Fallujah have traveled far and wide -- sparking, among other events, the horrific "Siege of Fallujah" that Dahr Jamail called, simply, "Our Guernica."

The families of the mutilated Blackwater contractors later sued the firm, alleging that various cost-cutting measures ultimately led to the men's deaths, and that those measures amounted to breach of contract.

Now, Blackwater's lashing out at the attorneys who brought the suit, in what appears to be kind of a trend of intimidation among private military firms …

Private security contractor Blackwater USA is seeking $10 million from the attorney representing the estates of four employees killed and mutilated in Iraq, arguing their families breached the security guards' contracts by suing the company for wrongful death.

Blackwater has also asked a federal court to move the dispute into arbitration, having failed so far in its ongoing efforts to have the lawsuit dismissed.

Arbitration is necessary "in order to safeguard both (Blackwater's) own confidential information as well as sensitive information implicating the interest of the United States at war," attorneys for Blackwater Security Consulting, a unit of Moyock-based Blackwater USA, wrote in a petition filed December 20.

Dan Callahan, a California-based attorney representing the families, called the claim "appalling."

"This is a shock-and-awe tactic," Callahan said Friday. Blackwater's attorneys declined to comment.

The four families, represented by estates administrator Richard Nordan, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Blackwater in January 2005 in state court. Family members argue Blackwater broke contractual obligations and used cost-saving measures that ultimately led to the deaths of the four men.

Blackwater's counterclaim for $10 million specifically names Nordan and not the estates or the men's families.

"The $10 million is a scare tactic," said Katy Helvenston, mother of Scott Helvenston, one of the dead Blackwater employees. "I'm not concerned about that at all because the whole thing's a farce. It's just another excuse to delay."

*No, they didn't actually sue the families themselves, but I figure they chose the strategy that they did because they didn't want to generate headlines like the one on this post.

Digg!

Tagged as: blackwater, contractors, iraq

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


Dems' Godly God-Fest Ends with Prayer by Former Christian Coalition Leader
A leader among the "New Evangelicals."
Post by Joshua Holland. August 29, 2008.
John McCain is Older Than Alaska
23 years older.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. August 29, 2008.
Palin Thinks Hillary is a Whiner
These days Palin is all about praising Hillary's efforts, but she used to sing a different tune.
Post by Melissa McEwan. August 29, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hey, they likely figure it works for the government..
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jan 20, 2007 3:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... so it will work for them. After all, Blackwater (the old name of a quickly fatal form of malaria, isn't it?) sees the government repeatedly attack people who have only a limited ability to defend themselves, and sonofagun, between effectively unlimited resources and ownership of the courts, they win! And isn't Blackwater the next best thing to being government itself? Or so they no doubt believe.

And Hell - maybe they're more right than we know.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My people Revolt.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Jan 21, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one reason why people revolt. They feel like victims of a system which does not serve them.

Shakespeare had it right: "kill all the lawyers."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

total psychopath tactic
Posted by: Don Garb on Jan 21, 2007 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Blame your accuser" again. These psychopaths never admit responsibility for anything because the idea that they've done anything wrong is completely alien to them. They think that assigning "blame" is another one of those emotional follies that the "limited" people indulge in. When they were younger they might have thought about sharpening up their charade so they could pass better as normal humans. But at this point they feel so powerful they can't be bothered to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keeping their secrets
Posted by: Jeanne on Jan 21, 2007 4:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
might be what really is happening, just as they say. I find it highly plausible that Blackwater would pursue this tactic to keep the case out of the public eye (out of the courtroom). It meshes well with information in Iraq for Sale and in Why We Fight. I am sure there is information that would come out if the employees' case is tried in court that would not show Blackwater in a good light.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My faith in the court system:
Posted by: satirelikefire on Jan 21, 2007 4:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This might be entertained for a brief second, but it's really just a scare tactic to get the families to look elsewhere. Or just a way to encourage the families to agree to settle out of court. Either way, it's chilling that Ken Starr is on the case! Blackwater, Whitewater?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My faith in the court system: Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
» RE: My faith in the court system: Posted by: gltirebiter
Corporate America
Posted by: buh on Jan 21, 2007 6:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's pretty obvious that these corporations hope to dominate every aspect of American life, wouldn't it be great if they could just go off to war for their cause without any need for governmental approval. Anyone remember the movie Rollerball? Best of luck to the victim's families, I've seen them documented on Democracy Now! not too long ago but I don't think there was any sign the mercenaries would take this route.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corporate America Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Let the courts decide.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 21, 2007 7:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, corporations who have their attorneys on retainer and therefore can use them to file countersuits do it everyday. It's tax deductible, just another business tax deduction. So its costs come out of the taxpayer's pocket eventually. So it's a good business move.

Is it civilized? If corporations are technically "persons," then, when they do something like this, they ought to be put in a rubber room with the rest of the nutcases.

Shame is the indicator of the civilized person. (As opposed to psychological guilt, which we ask our shrinks to help us shake off.) Shame arises if we belong to a civilized community.

So, no, Blackwater has no shame. They are outlaws. And it seems they make good money hiring others willing to gamble with their lives. "Those who live by the sword..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Holland, we missed you at the Media Reform Conference
Posted by: LeftWright on Jan 21, 2007 9:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Still working on that 9/11 article or did your editor shelve it?

The 9/11 cover-up in the media continues.

The "war on terrorism" is a lie.

Wake up brothers and sisters.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Be well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blame Blame
Posted by: Uncle Crabby on Jan 22, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I feel some sadness for these families, obviously their family member decided to join the mercenaries and go killing for profit. I feel nothing for them. I am appalled, but completely unsurprised that the US would stoop so low as to hire murder for money.

Blackwater and all of its ilk are complete shit and the sooner they are all dead, the better for all people.

What would happen if nobody took a job with Blackwater? I don't know ... better than what we have now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

arbitration is the silencer
Posted by: helzphar on Jan 22, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The suit against the attorney is just for show. If Blackwater gets the judge to order arbitration -- more likely in federal court-- you'll never hear another word about what the company did in exposing those men. The contract can't bind the families of the dead employees from seeking redress. It's another Bush right-wing coverup attempt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Degrees of Evil
Posted by: paschn on Jan 22, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well Well,.... The families of the "bought and paid for", amoral bastards that were put into place to delay or avoid political fallout from a re-called draft are seeking redress?
I guess a mercenary spirit didn't stop in those families with the ones who got their asses caught did it?
So,... Whom do we call more evil? The grandson of the Nazi profiteer Prescott Bush? or the hired murderers who put their loyalty with the highest bidder?
How's this sound;
"Your Honor, we intend to show that the deaths of these hired killers was caused by their employers cutting costs. Further, it puts a hardship on their survivors and tarnished their good names for doing nothing more than helping to invade a country and slaughtering 700,000 civilians. We feel those families need millions in restitution for the loss of their hired killers."
Sound about right? Hell, squeek loudly enough and the drones in this country will most likey find in their favor and give em a dead veteran's pention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the inaccurate headline?
Posted by: Cath on Jan 22, 2007 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm taken aback by the headline saying Blackwater was suing the families....and then admitting in the text that the company did not sue.
I know that there's much creepy about the situation, but the corporate attorneys are doing their job, and Alternet disappoints. The headline is an untruth, and I expect more from this site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why the inaccurate headline? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Why the inaccurate headline? Posted by: juliamiami
Blackwater Bucks
Posted by: dougo on Jan 22, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shameless mother fuckers! These men died for the profit of what is essentially a criminal enterprise orchestrated by Bu$hco-Cheney LLC. Had we done things right,using U.S.military forces sufficient for the situation non of this would have come about and these men would be alive today,at home with their families. A occupying force must police the nation to protect the populace and prevent the very type of violence we see in Iraq today. Everyone but Bush/ Rove/Cheney/Rummy knew the so-called light force sent into Iraq was insufficient for the number of people required to protect not only our troops but the Iraqi people .The presnit and the cabal running our government and the puppet in Iraq are squarely to blame for all the death and destruction. We assembled nearly 700000 troops for the first gulf war. Revenge is sweet it is said. Bush got his. Too bad this country and the Iraqi's paid the price for Bush's folly.These unfortunate souls bought into the promise of high pay and adventure. High pay? The CEO of Blackwater is raking it in.Was it worth it to the families of these dead mercenaries?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blackwater Bucks Posted by: fixitt