Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Doubletalk From Barney Frank?

Posted by David Sirota at 4:56 AM on January 9, 2007.


After declaring his continued support for fair trade, a new chairman and progressive stalwart looks like he's instead doing rhetorical backflips.
fishmouth
This fish has two mouths.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Regular readers of my work likely remember the back and forth I recently had with Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) over his so-called "grand bargain." Frank was irritated that I raised objections to him offering to support more "free" trade deals in exchange for business accepting a raise in the minimum wage. Frank said I somehow misrepresented him, and that he is, in fact, fully committed to making sure Democrats use their new power to force trade agreements to include labor, human rights and environmental standards.

Frank's explanation sounded great. He cited a recent article of his promising that "Democrats will insist on incorporating labor and environmental standards in trade policy." I was happy that he went on record stating support for a fair trade agenda - one that proved decisive in the 2006 elections. That is, until I read this excerpt from Bloomberg News today:

"Frank's proposal includes Democratic backing to renew Bush's so-called 'fast track' authority to negotiate trade pacts that can't be amended by Congress."
You may recall, fast track has been the key authority that the executive branch has used to prevent labor, human rights or environmental standards from being put in trade deals. Fast track authority was created so that president's could prevent Congress from putting these standards in trade deals. Fast track authority was created, in short, to make sure Democrats CANNOT with any real power "insist on incorporating labor and environmental standards in trade policy."

So what we seem to be seeing here is political doubletalk, even though I am sure some folks will try to acrobatically explain it away as some sort of double secret super fakeout form of negotiation (which it most certainly is not). Congressman Frank seems to be telling us he is committed to fair trade, yet his "grand bargain" seems committed to something entirely different. I'm waiting to hear how he can square his fair trade rhetoric with the reality of what he is now pushing. Or, maybe like last time, he will claim that the Capitol Hill press corps misreported what he is pushing, and that actually he fully opposes fast track. I'm all ears for his explanation.

Digg!

Tagged as: barney frank

David Sirota is a veteran political strategist and author of Hostile Takeover, a New York Times bestseller about the corruption of both political parties.


Palin's 'Lie of the Year' Was Not a Misunderstanding
No chance now to try to preserve her credibility now.
Post by Matt Gertz. December 23, 2009.
Video: New Ad Takes Obama to Task for Ditching Public Option
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee is hitting the president hard -- with his own words -- for backing a health-care bill with a mandate and no public option.
Post by AlterNet Staff. December 23, 2009.
What Does College Football Have to Do With Abortion? Tons, According to Anti-Choice Wingnuts
The brouhaha over Notre Dame is an opportunity for the right to wage war on women, intellectuals and sexual freedom all at once.
Post by Amanda Marcotte. December 23, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?