Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Confused about global warming? Thank ExxonMobil

Posted by Tara Lohan at 2:40 PM on January 4, 2007.


Tara Lohan: The petro giant was nabbed again in their plot to misinform the American people and muddy the scientific waters.
exxonblog
exxonblog

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

A new report from the Union of Concerned Scientists offers the latest evidence about how ExxonMobil has been actively working for years on a disinformation campaign to prevent action on climate change, confuse the public, and stymie scientists.

ExxonMobil is one of the world's largest producers of global warming pollution - if they were a country, ExxonMobil would rank 6th in the world in global warming emissions.

According to the report, "Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Change," the company has funneled nearly $16 million between 1998 and 2005 to a network of 43 advocacy organizations that seek to confuse the public on global warming science.

Apparently the oil industry is taking lessons from the tobacco industry. As UCS reports, ExxonMobil: "raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific evidence; funded an array of front organizations to create the appearance of a broad platform for a tight-knit group of vocal climate change contrarians who misrepresent peer-reviewed scientific findings; attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest for 'sound science' rather than business self-interest; and used its access to the Bush administration to block federal policies and shape government communications on global warming."

The report is like adding insult to injury. It's only a few days into the new year and already the UK's Guardian just reported that "global temperatures will rise to their highest levels ever recorded this year, according to scientists at the Met Office. They believe there is a 60% chance that 2007 temperatures will top the previous hottest year, 1998."

In times like these ExxonMobil's misinformation campaign is playing with fire. They may be void of any ethical responsibility, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to follow along. Join a growing grassroots movement to hold them accountable and tell your representatives and senators to reject all the "Big Oil" disinformation campaigns by supporting several critical policies in the new Congress:

  • Immediately repeal tax breaks for ExxonMobil and other major oil companies and redirect money to renewable energy programs and energy efficiency technologies;
  • Support a sound, science-based bill that would reduce global warming emissions as quickly as possible to 80 percent below 1990 levels;
  • Increase fuel economy standards for passenger vehicles, including all trucks, SUVs and buses;
  • Require utilities to significantly boost their use of clean renewable energy sources.

Digg!

Tagged as: global warming, exxonmobil, oil companies, misinformation

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Like cigarettes
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jan 4, 2007 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if people cared they would stop using them. I don't understand the fascination with subterfuge and conspiracies. Its not hard to understand. There is a demand for hydrocarbons; whether for fuel, plastics, rubber, energy sources, fertilizer, etc etc. ExxonMobil, and the other energy concerns, try to satisfy that demand from, big breath here, the people who, for some odd reason, seem to enjoy heat in their homes, the ability to travel, and the 1000's of uses of the various hydrocarbons. They, like any public company, try, -big gasp- to satisfy the share-holders (much of which are, oh my God, large institutional investors: like unions, retirement funds, teacher unions, State pension funds, etc.) They also simply work within the framework the various countries set-up. So stop bitching and do something about the laws and your investments and personal habits instead of conspiratorial thinking that there is some evil cabal out there controlling everything (ExxonMobil is the new jew or freedmasons in people's minds I guess.)
1) don't invest in ExxonMobil
2) don't heat your home with any hydrocarbon based/derived fuel
3) don't drive a car or use any public transit system that is fueled by any hydrocarbons
4) vote new laws if you think the current regulations and laws are not appropriate

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One more thing
Posted by: Gaubladt on Jan 4, 2007 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recent legislation has allowed the oil compaines to invest in utility companies. This change in the law probably had something to do with the jump in prices at the gas pump a year ago. This new right should be abolished as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One more thing Posted by: willymack
Ideological hoopla
Posted by: Leman on Jan 5, 2007 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole issue is nothing but ideological hoopla. "Progressives" are afraid to challenge the current government on anything really important - so, let's blow an imaginary crisis out of proportion and blame Republicans and the big corporate bogey man for it.

It's a good propaganda trick and the fact that the movie is narrated by Al Gore and released right before elections is no coincidence. The only problem is: nobody outside AlterNet readers' base cares. And of those who do care - not everybody believes it.

My friend did his Ph.D. in atmospheric physics. His research involved quantifying satellite pictures of the Arctic ice cap and estimating the rate at which it melts. In 1994 his group came to the conclusion that "in 30 years Texas will be covered by water and Michigan will be warm enough to grow oranges". That was 12 years ago - i.e. we are almost half way to that blessed time. You would think by now Michigan would be at least 10-15 degrees warmer. Well, I think it's clear you can stop collecting those orange seeds.

Now, how much of Big Oil's propaganda activity is an anti-scientific spin? And how much of it is a counter-spin in reaction to the Left hysteria?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ideological hoopla Posted by: mdruss42
» Who is your "friend", what "group"? Posted by: angstotheclown
Global warming is real, and responding means not using fossil fuels...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 5, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And what that means is end of the most profitable industry of the last hundred years - the fossil fuel industry. It means declining market shares, and it also means the loss of political power (note that the only reason the US invaded Iraq was to control the region's oil output).

In response to this, the fossil fuel industry has mounted a massive public relations operation to protect itself - there's no 'conspiracy', it's all perfectly legal - but the fact is they are lying through their teeth to protect their shareholder's dividends, with the wholehearted support of their shareholders, who can't stand the thought of giving up their Lear jets and plush lifestyles.

The only answer to global warming is strict regulations that limit the amount of fossil fuel being used, coupled with a massive program to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy - which will not be easy, but which will provide renewable energy companies with growth opportunities - which is why you see hard-nosed conservatives lining up to invest in the most promising renewables.

Change will come, even if ExxonMobile has to be dragged kicking and screaming into the future.

By the way, no climate scientist has ever claimed that "Texas will be covered in water" due to global warming. That's just another attempt by the tobacco/fossil fuel PR people to smear climate science. "My grandmother smoked for years and never got cancer, and these politically motivated doctors claim that everyone who smokes gets cancer!", etc.

Melting ice caps and glaciers, heat waves and droughts, more powerful and unpredictable storms (flooding), rising sea levels, and problems with ecosystems and agricultural production - those are what you have to worry about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FOR MORE ON THIS STORY
Posted by: SamFox on Jan 5, 2007 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
go to newswithviews.com

At the bottom of the page find the site search box. Enter Global Warming. You will find that there is more to the story than the lead story suggests.

I do not trust the media. This is the same media that gave us Reefer Madness, only bigger & more influential. Reefer madness led to the phoney war on drugs. Just because the same thing is said over & over does not make it true and is usually a sign of propagandic influence.

We are told the US must sign up for the Kyoto Accord. Bad idea. All that would do is give the UN more control of the US. But China is left out of the demand for signing the Kyoto treaty. Gee, I wonder why that is.

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're joking right? Posted by: lessbread
No need to elaborate Warming truth anymore
Posted by: common intelligence on Jan 5, 2007 11:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the dramatics and redundant quibling on expressing our innate fears on the state of our planet are all well known, by most everyone. The retorical arguments with pictures and arrows and graphs expand more each passing day, with every tank of gas and every wasted argument.

The flora and fauna of our planet are deminishing everyday, every season, while the histerical and those too busy to draw a line in the sand and stop participating in the activities that are responsible for the proven effects that cause the warming.

Sorry to say the speed of buearocracy and greed have set into motion a tidal wave of consiquences that can not be stopped. While we all run out to see the drama of the exceptional receeding tide of life and read of the environmental evidence over and over, the Tidal wave is building. We can't stop or reverse the firestorm we've already set afire.

It's noble and a beautiful expose' of new morals people are expressing in small talk and chit-chat. But The economic power controlers have everyone by the perverbial balls, and no one can stop their way of life for a minute. Nor can they afford to change. Living small is not an option any longer.
Habitual materialism has addicted the planet. It is our undoing.

The shockwave of civilization making an immediate shift from materialist gluttony would unleash world wide panic.
(Actually the world is already in a panic. Isn't everyone you know struggling from week to week, to hold on to what they have?) We can't stop! The governments, supply industries, and the people are all struggling like they are in quick sand; the more we struggle the deeper we get.

Can you cut loose and live simply? Collectively, if each individual does it might slow the inevitable down.

But the polar bears are still going the way of the DoDo bird. Pelagic birds are dying of plastic ingestion/malnutrition. Coral reefs, Stellar Sea Lions vanishing.

The Japanese are still killing Dolphins by the hundreds and strip mining the oceans.
The north Atlantic herring are vanishing.
The Chinese are removing 7 football fields a day of top soil out of the Amazon.
American corporations are stip mining the Amazon for gold, washing the top soil away.
Every continental society has genicide activities happening.
People racing in Jet aircraft all over the globe as if there is something to be in a hurry about, pumping unnecessary tons of carbon into the sky every minute of every day. Every one race to get to work on time for fear they will get fired or not be able to pay their morgages, rent, car payments, credit cards, medical bills, insurance, taxes.

It's all superfluous shit.

How very sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]