Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why John Edwards changes everything

Posted by Bob Geiger at 9:21 AM on December 28, 2006.


Edwards ups the ante on other Democratic contenders
edwardsannounces

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

The Fraud Of Fraud
Digby Hullabaloo

Broken Glass
DCap DistributorCap

Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
Emptywheel Firedoglake

In the backyard of a Hurricane Katrina victim in New Orleans' 9th Ward, former Senator and Vice-Presidential candidate John Edwards announced today that he is running for the Democratic presidential nomination. And, in what can be better characterized as a talk than a formal political speech, Edwards changed the dynamic of the fledgling Democratic race for 2008 with both the tone and substance of his message.

Asking Americans to "be patriotic about something beyond war," Edwards stood in the middle of a New Orleans yard and talked about getting Americans mobilized to create domestic change now and not just in conjunction with a political campaign. He talked earnestly about the need to restore America's battered global image, the critical mass being hit in the country's health-care crisis and the fact that he believes his vote to allow George W. Bush's war in Iraq was just flat-out wrong.

Edwards says he strongly regrets his 2002 vote on the Iraq war resolution, that it was "a mistake" and rebuked the entire notion of a troop surge and escalating U.S. presence in Iraq.

"We need to reject this McCain doctrine of surging troops and escalating the war in Iraq," said Edwards. "We need to make clear we're going to leave and we need to start leaving Iraq."

But more than anything, Edwards announcing so early and, more importantly, the way he's entered the race has changed the entire landscape for aspiring Democratic nominees.

For Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack and Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich -- the only other declared candidates at the moment -- Edwards is setting a standard for energy and relevance that they will either equal or drop quickly from the radar screen, as Edwards attracts all of the early support and media attention.

For Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Barack Obama (D-IL), Joe Biden (D-DE), John Kerry (D-MA) and Christopher Dodd (D-CT), along with General Wesley Clark and Governor Bill Richardson, the sheer magnetism and established support that Edwards brings so early, forces them to either declare their intentions as well or risk losing support to the former North Carolina Senator with every passing week.

And why exactly would I say something like that when we're not even out of 2006?

To begin with, Americans are bone-tired of disliking and disrespecting their president and, I believe, are unusually anxious to begin the presidential season to, if nothing else, give them the feeling that a change is coming sooner than later. People hungered for a change in the Congress and made it happen -- now that strong desire to take out the trash moves to the executive branch of government.

Second, Edwards is starting his campaign in an interesting way by making it not about him personally, but about the problems of the world, the loss of global American prestige, our domestic strife and the extent to which his campaign is about getting people to make change now and not wait for the actions of a newly-elected president.

"We want people in this campaign to actually take action now, not later, not after the next election," said Edwards this morning. "Instead of staying home and complaining, we're asking Americans to help."

Finally, many people, including yours truly, believed in hindsight that Edwards would have defeated Bush in 2004 had he been at the top of the Democratic ticket. Edwards was undeniably a more engaging personality than John Kerry and with so much of the vote driven by sheer disgust with Bush, Edwards would have picked up Kerry's 49 percent of the vote and then some based purely on the likeability factor -- that's not the way a president should be chosen but, in our country, it just is.

And, after six years of Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, death in Iraq and the growing sense among Americans that life was much better -- and safer -- when we were liked and respected in the world, Edwards has a central theme that may resonate with millions of voters.

"The biggest responsibility of the next President of the United States is to reestablish America's leadership role in the world," said Edwards in his announcement this morning.

America is starving for genuine leadership and Edwards delivered an honest, inspiring message this morning -- let's see how his future opponents for the Democratic nomination respond.

Digg!

Tagged as: presidency, 2008

Bob Geiger is a writer, activist and Democratic operative in Westchester County, NY. You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at BobGeiger.com.


The Fraud Of Fraud
The process of turning ACORN into a terrorist sleeper cell has begun and I see little hope that they aren't going to be successful.
Post by Digby. October 11, 2008.
Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's About Time
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 28, 2006 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way progressives are going to transition from fighting rear guard actions and start controlling the agenda is to ask for and get a clear mandate from the American voter. That's Right, ask for a mandate. Getting one will require a bright line between the policies in place and where we need to go.

This mission will require someone to speak in clear unambiguous language. No equivocation or qualification. Edwards has shown that he can deliver such a message with his 2 Americas speech. If you have not heard it, it can easily be found in many places on the internet.

Take a peek on Google Video HERE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Competence, caring, decency
Posted by: JohnMucci on Dec 28, 2006 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards is one of the most decent human beings I have ever met.

I look for competence, caring, and decency in those that will serve us. John Edwards is all of these things.

I was saddened that American voters did not see this in 2004. I hope they see it in 2008. I can't imagine a more worthwhile candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards is the best bet by far - notice how it was Kerry that caved in '04
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 28, 2006 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 2004 election results should have been challenged, and Edwards was willing to do it before Kerry sold the US public out - who knows why - maybe the Skull & Bones connection to GW Bush was the deciding factor in that.

Edwards talks about the need for a strong domestic renewable energy industry (something Obama and Hillary won't touch) and he'd work for the American people, not the international corporatocracy - he's the best candidate by far, though I'm sure Ralph Nader will single him out for attack for not being a "Greenwashed Party Member".

Plus, he's smarter then either Hillary or Obama. If the Democrats want any chance at winning in 2008, they should back Edwards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't get it...
Posted by: bassman on Dec 28, 2006 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every thing he says just seems so contrived. He has no experience, other than losing in 2004. What did John Edwards accomplish in one term of the Senate? What legislation has he written? What is his voting record? He helped write the Iraq War Resolution authorizing this fiasco, he voted for the Patriot Act... I don't get it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I DON'T GET IT - MAKES A GOOD POINT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Dec 28, 2006 3:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like Edwards, but the truth be told there were times when he seemed afraid to speak out. The Iraq War baggage is shared by so many wannabees for president. Who's to say that in similar circumstances they might not screw up again. We do need independent thinkers. They can't continue to pretend that all is well just to avoid an argument. Saying what they think we want to hear is just another way of lying to us. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Looking for Mr. Goodbar's vote???....
Posted by: ekipnrut on Dec 28, 2006 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wastes time in search of credentials grounded in integrity,
intellectual capacity or proven genius of leadership....
You wanna win in '08 ?
Hey...I will run to you ONE time how this can be
done..Capice??
Portmanteau...that's right....Portmanteau....WTF???...Why???

TomKat.....that's right:TomKat

Everybody..EVERYBODY...reading this...repug or prog...
liberal or neonazi, white or black knows immediately
the identity of TomKat. :o)
In politics:Repetition will be the People's (Pavlov) choice.
That that you've been subliminally and consciously immer-
sed in and bombarded with WILL be your choice in the
voting booth.
So all you'all need is a 'sexy' candidate portmanteau
for '08 e.g. 'GooDeHead'...'NyceAsh'.... and victory
in '08 is GUARANTEED.
Why fret and worry over platform...strategy...and
demographics, when a simple appeal to mindless mimicry
will do? Remember this is the 'Merikun 'Morning and We
got Work to do...triple appeal to redneck racists, Raygun
devotees and Blacks over 40.
Think this is BS??
Alternet...what comes to mind first? Painstaking-
ly crafted well thought out comments or a couple of
'cute' handles of those who post comments... ;o)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The big question
Posted by: waves999 on Dec 28, 2006 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my opinion, Americans need to elect a Democratic President who has no major ties to the kleptocracy (good luck)... no favours to be repaid for lofty corporate campaign contributions (good luck on that one too)... a person who understands the concept of “ethics”... but most importantly someone who is a progressive thinker. You’ve got Al Gore whom I really admire, but who may have positioned himself too far to the “left” with his startling climate change film. Obama is very bright and progressive but maybe too young to be Prez... and is America really ready for a black President? Kerry has turned into too much of an Ichabod Crane character for me; I wish he’d stop dreaming, he’s done. And I don’t trust Hillary. The other Dem contenders really haven’t thrown their hats into the ring yet, so I don’t know them too well. That leaves Mr Cool, John Edwards. The big question: is he electable...?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The big question Posted by: bassman
Another VITAL necessity is...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Dec 28, 2006 7:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that we MUST start turning over every rock in Washington, show up all of the neocon/dominionists, and start prosecutions for sedition and treason. If we don't, we'll just have to fight the same damned battle over again, sooner rather than later. Both Jesus lovin' Pat's have to go, all of GW's bible study buddies - it's a long, LONG list, but it's clear, and we have to run all of them down and take care of business. I know it sounds like petty vindictiveness, but it isn't. There are fanatic cultists who truly believe they have to take over the US and turn it into a theocracy, execute everyone who refuses to profess a belief in their version of Christianity, and then control the rest of the world into Armageddon. This is not tinfoil-hat time, either. The evidence is overwhelming.

The only real advantage we've got is that they stepped out into the daylight a bit too soon. If things go badly in '08 for them, they'll be crawling back under their rocks and people won't pay any attention to them until next time it's too late.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Edwards 2008 or Should We Say Israel 2008?
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Dec 30, 2006 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards, the Smiling Hawk

by Stephen Zunes

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/zunes.php?articleid=3074

What Did the Democrats Know and When Did they Know It?
The Lies of John Edwards

by Joh Walsh

http://www.counterpunch.org/walsh12052005.html


Jewish children send
'love' messages
to Lebanese children . . .

http://www.radioislam.org/lebanon/jewish-gifs/index.htm

Just what John Edwards AVOIDS discussing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Edwards 2008 or Should We Say Israel 2008?
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Dec 30, 2006 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why John Edwards "Changes" NOTHING!
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Dec 30, 2006 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards, the Smiling Hawk

by Stephen Zunes

What Did the Democrats Know and When Did they Know It?
The Lies of John Edwards


by Joh Walsh

Jewish children send
'love' messages
to Lebanese children . . .


Until JUSTICE is disucssed and NOT JUST US, you will see no peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Is This Unimportant To You Mr. Edwards? Why Are you SILENT Regarding This? Are You a Puppet?
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Dec 30, 2006 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Examples of Hate Speech

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Foresight Is Better Than Hindsight
Posted by: Dianne D. on Dec 31, 2006 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did read the article linked above, "John Edwards, The Smiling Hawk," and was dismayed by what I read. Yes, we can learn through our experience, as it appears Mr. Edward may have as he has said his decision to authorize President Bush to go to war was wrong. But it's better to have the wisdom that will prevent bad experience. I just read on the barackobama.com website a speech that he made in October, 2002, prior to being elected Senator of Illinois, that he strongly opposed the invasion of Iraq, with most impressive reasons. While Obama may not have Edwards' experience, he does have wisdom. Assuming he will run, Obama is my choice for '08.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards is a sellout, get real.
Posted by: summerhill on Jan 3, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in NC, home state of Edwards. He doesn't get a majority vote here because people know him and know what he is like. He's had a bad reputation for awhile.

Now with his power aspirations he has degenerated into a puppet for the CFR elite.

This fluff piece reminds me of a frequent Southern saying ... "Ya ain't from around here, are ya."

Is this article comedy or tragedy? You could argue either way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]